Instructional grouping for reading: Teachers' views

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 347-356

  Moody, Sally Watson ^b   Vaughn, Sharon ^a   Schumm, Jeanne Shay ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031280888     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193259701800604     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Baker, J., & Zigmond, N. (1990), Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with teaming disabilities? Exceptional Children, 56, 515-526.
2. Barr, R. (1989). The social organization of literacy instruction. National Reading Conference Yeatbook: Vol. 38 (pp. 19-34). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.
3. Barr, R. (1995). What research says about grouping in the past and present and what it suggests about the future. In M. Radencich & L. McKay (Eds.), Flexible gruoping for literacy in the elementary grades (pp. 1-24). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-15.
5. Bogdan, R., & Bilden, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1994). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavioral problems (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Bromme, R., & Brophy, J. (1986). Teachers' cognitive activities. In B. Christiansen, G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 99-140). Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
8. Calfee, R., & Brown, R. (1979). Grouping students for instruction. In S. L. Duke (Ed.), Classroom management. Seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 144-182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Dyson, J. W., Godwin, P. H. B., & Hazelwood, L. A. (1976). Group composition, leadership orientation and decisional outcomes. Small Group Behavior, 7, 114-128.
10. Esposito, D. (1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: Principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments. Review of Educational Research, 43, 163-179.
11. Floden, R. E., & Klinzing, H. G. (1990). What can research on teacher thinking contribute to teacher preparation? A second opinion. Educational Researcher, 19, 15-20.
12. Flood, J., Lapp, D., Flood, S., & Nagel, G. (1992). Am I allowed to group? Using flexible patterns for effective instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45, 608-616.
13. Floyd, C. (1954). Meeting children's reading needs in the middle grades: A preliminary report. Elementary School Journal, 55, 99-103.
14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
15. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1994). Looking in classrooms (6th ed.), New York: HarperCollins.
16. Good, T. L., & Stipek, D. J. (1983). Individual differences in the classroom: A psychological perspective. In G. D. Fenstermacher & J. I. Goodlad (Eds.), Individual differences and the common curriculum. Eighty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1 (pp. 9-43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Goodlad, J. I., & Anderson, R. H. (1959). The nongraded elementary school. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
18. Grossen, B. (1993). Focus: Heterogeneous grouping and curriculum design. Effective School Practices, 12, 5-8.
19. Hallinan, M. T., & Sorensen, A. B. (1985). Ability grouping and student friendships. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 485-499.
20. Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1980). How to increase reading ability (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
21. Heathers, G. (1972). Overview of innovations in organizing for learning. Interchange, 3, 47-68.
22. Hiebert, E. H. (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 231-255.
23. Kameenui, E. J. (1993). Diverse learners and the tyranny of time: Don't fix blame; fut the leaky roof. The Reading Teacher, 5, 376-383.
24. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity & Excellence, 23, 22-30.
25. Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 31-44) (Research methods for primary care series, Vol. 3). Newbury Park, CA; Sage.
26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Marshall, H., & Weinstein, R. (1984). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations: An interactional model. Renew of Educational Research, 53, 519-570.
28. McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249-261.
29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessari method. New York: Shocken Books.
31. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1991). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, consequences, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York: Macmillan.
32. Otto, W. R. (1977). The Wisconsin design: A reading program for individually guided education. In H. J. Klausmeier, R. A. Rossmiller, & M. Saily (Eds.), Individually guided elementary education: Concepts and practices (pp. 137-149), New York: Academic Press.
33. Pikulski, J. J. (1991). Grouping for literacy instruction: A need for thoughtful reconsideration. Florida Reading Quarterly, 27(4), 7-12.
34. Radencich, M. C., & McKay, L. J. (1995). Flexible grouping for literacy in the elementary grades. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 559-586.
36. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Wilson, B. (1980). The effect of classroom structure on shared perceptions of ability. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 75-82.
37. Schumm, J. S., Moody, S. W., & Vaughn, S. (1997). Grouping for reading instruction: General education teachers' perceptions and practices. Manuscript submitted for publication.
38. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers' perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12(4), 18-27.
39. Schumm, J. S., Vaughn, S., Gordon, J., & Rothlein, L. (1994). General education teachers' beliefs, skills, and practices in planning for mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 22-37.
40. Slavin, R. E. (1984). Research Methods in Education: A Practical Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
42. Stevens, R., Madden, N., Slavin, R., & Farnish, A. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433-454.
43. Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Schumm, J. S., & Klingner, J. (in press). A collaborative effort to enhance reading and writing. Learning Disability Quarterly.
44. Vaughn, S., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (in press). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children.
45. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. M. (1996). The focus group interview: Use and application in educational and psychological research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Veatch, J. (1978). Reading in the elementary school (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.