Gradual Implementation of the Meiotic Recombination Program via Checkpoint Pathways Controlled by Global DSB Levels

Molecular Cell

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 797-811

  Joshi, Neeraj ^a,e   Brown, M Scott ^b   Bishop, Douglas K ^b   Börner, G Valentin ^a,c,d  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA LIGASE; MEC1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PCH2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; SPO11 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; TEL1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; METABOLISM; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTOR;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPAIR ENZYMES; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MEIOSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84923878831     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ahuja J.S., Börner G.V. Analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 745:99-116.
2. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 2001, 106:47-57.
3. Bishop D.K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 1994, 79:1081-1092.
4. Blitzblau H.G., Chan C.S., Hochwagen A., Bell S.P. Separation of DNA replication from the assembly of break-competent meiotic chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002643.
5. Borde V., Goldman A.S., Lichten M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 2000, 290:806-809.
6. Börner G.V., Kleckner N., Hunter N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 2004, 117:29-45.
7. Börner G.V., Barot A., Kleckner N. Yeast Pch2 promotes domainal axis organization, timely recombination progression, and arrest of defective recombinosomes during meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:3327-3332.
8. Buhler C., Borde V., Lichten M. Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e324.
9. Carballo J.A., Johnson A.L., Sedgwick S.G., Cha R.S. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 2008, 132:758-770.
10. Cartagena-Lirola H., Guerini I., Viscardi V., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Budding yeast Sae2 is an invivo target of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases during meiosis. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:1549-1559.
11. Chen C., Jomaa A., Ortega J., Alani E.E. Pch2 is a hexameric ring ATPase that remodels the chromosome axis protein Hop1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:E44-E53.
12. Cooper T.J., Wardell K., Garcia V., Neale M.J. Homeostatic regulation of meiotic DSB formation by ATM/ATR. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 329:124-131.
13. Gray S., Allison R.M., Garcia V., Goldman A.S., Neale M.J. Positive regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation by activation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1(ATR). Open Biol. 2013, 3:130019.
14. Henderson K.A., Keeney S. Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:4519-4524.
15. Higgins J.D., Perry R.M., Barakate A., Ramsay L., Waugh R., Halpin C., Armstrong S.J., Franklin F.C. Spatiotemporal asymmetry of the meiotic program underlies the predominantly distal distribution of meiotic crossovers in barley. Plant Cell 2012, 24:4096-4109.
16. Ho H.C., Burgess S.M. Pch2 acts through Xrs2 and Tel1/ATM to modulate interhomolog bias and checkpoint function during meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002351.
17. Hunter N., Kleckner N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 2001, 106:59-70.
18. Hyppa R.W., Smith G.R. Crossover invariance determined by partner choice for meiotic DNA break repair. Cell 2010, 142:243-255.
19. Johnson R.D., Jasin M. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2000, 19:3398-3407.
20. Joshi N., Barot A., Jamison C., Börner G.V. Pch2 links chromosome axis remodeling at future crossover sites and crossover distribution during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000557.
21. Kadyk L.C., Hartwell L.H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992, 132:387-402.
22. Kauppi L., Barchi M., Baudat F., Romanienko P.J., Keeney S., Jasin M. Distinct properties of the XY pseudoautosomal region crucial for male meiosis. Science 2011, 331:916-920.
23. Kim K.P., Weiner B.M., Zhang L., Jordan A., Dekker J., Kleckner N. Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 2010, 143:924-937.
24. Kumar A., Mazzanti M., Mistrik M., Kosar M., Beznoussenko G.V., Mironov A.A., Garrè M., Parazzoli D., Shivashankar G.V., Scita G., et al. ATR mediates a checkpoint at the nuclear envelope in response to mechanical stress. Cell 2014, 158:633-646.
25. Lydall D., Nikolsky Y., Bishop D.K., Weinert T. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 1996, 383:840-843.
26. Martini E., Diaz R.L., Hunter N., Keeney S. Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 2006, 126:285-295.
27. Mets D.G., Meyer B.J. Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 2009, 139:73-86.
28. Neale M.J., Ramachandran M., Trelles-Sticken E., Scherthan H., Goldman A.S. Wild-type levels of Spo11-induced DSBs are required for normal single-strand resection during meiosis. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:835-846.
29. Neale M.J., Pan J., Keeney S. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2005, 436:1053-1057.
30. Niu H., Wan L., Baumgartner B., Schaefer D., Loidl J., Hollingsworth N.M. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:5804-5818.
31. Paciotti V., Clerici M., Scotti M., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:3913-3925.
32. Pan J., Sasaki M., Kniewel R., Murakami H., Blitzblau H.G., Tischfield S.E., Zhu X., Neale M.J., Jasin M., Socci N.D., et al. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 2011, 144:719-731.
33. Roig I., Dowdle J.A., Toth A., de Rooij D.G., Jasin M., Keeney S. Mouse TRIP13/PCH2 is required for recombination and normal higher-order chromosome structure during meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001062.
34. Sanchez-Moran E., Santos J.L., Jones G.H., Franklin F.C. ASY1 mediates AtDMC1-dependent interhomolog recombination during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:2220-2233.
35. Sheridan S.D., Yu X., Roth R., Heuser J.E., Sehorn M.G., Sung P., Egelman E.H., Bishop D.K. A comparative analysis of Dmc1 and Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:4057-4066.
36. Shiotani B., Zou L. Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:547-558.
37. Ström L., Karlsson C., Lindroos H.B., Wedahl S., Katou Y., Shirahige K., Sjögren C. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 2007, 317:242-245.
38. Symington L.S., Gautier J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45:247-271.
39. Ünal E., Heidinger-Pauli J.M., Koshland D. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 2007, 317:245-248.
40. Usui T., Ogawa H., Petrini J.H. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:1255-1266.
41. van der Heijden G.W., Bortvin A. Transient relaxation of transposon silencing at the onset of mammalian meiosis. Epigenetics 2009, 4:76-79.
42. Wu H.Y., Burgess S.M. Two distinct surveillance mechanisms monitor meiotic chromosome metabolism in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:2473-2479.
43. Wu H.Y., Ho H.C., Burgess S.M. Mek1 kinase governs outcomes of meiotic recombination and the checkpoint response. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1707-1716.
44. Xu L., Kleckner N. Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J. 1995, 14:5115-5128.
45. Zakharyevich K., Ma Y., Tang S., Hwang P.Y., Boiteux S., Hunter N. Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:1001-1015.
46. Zanders S., Sonntag Brown M., Chen C., Alani E. Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2011, 188:511-521.
47. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300:1542-1548.