Homeostatic regulation of meiotic DSB formation by ATM/ATR

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 329, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 124-131

  Cooper, Tim J ^a   Wardell, Kayleigh ^a   Garcia, Valerie ^a   Neale, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ATM; ATR; Mec1; Meiosis; Recombination; Spo11; Tel1

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; DSB PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; SPO11 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATR PROTEIN, HUMAN; ATR PROTEIN, MOUSE;

CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CROSSING OVER; DNA DAMAGE; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; NUCLEAR DIVISION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN HOMEOSTASIS; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; HOMEOSTASIS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; MEIOSIS;

EID: 84919363025     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.016     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Smith J., Tho L.M., Xu N., Gillespie D.A. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 2010, 108:73-112. 10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0.
2. Keeney S. Spo11 and the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. Genome Dyn. Stab. 2008, 2:81-123. 10.1007/7050_2007_026.
3. Keeney S., Neale M.J. Initiation of meiotic recombination by formation of DNA double-strand breaks: mechanism and regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34:523-525. 10.1042/BST0340523.
4. Page S.L., Hawley R.S. The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 20:525-558. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.155141.
5. MacQueen A.J., Hochwagen A. Checkpoint mechanisms: the puppet masters of meiotic prophase. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:393-400. 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.004.
6. Buhler C., Borde V., Lichten M. Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e324. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050324.
7. Pan J., Sasaki M., Kniewel R., Murakami H., Blitzblau H.G., Tischfield S.E., et al. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 2011, 144:719-731. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.009.
8. Joyce E.F., Pedersen M., Tiong S., White-Brown S.K., Paul A., Campbell S.D., et al. Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195:359-367. 10.1083/jcb.201104121.
9. Kauppi L., Barchi M., Lange J., Baudat F., Jasin M., Keeney S. Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:873-886. 10.1101/gad.213652.113.
10. Lange J., Pan J., Cole F., Thelen M.P., Jasin M., Keeney S. ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 2011, 479:237-240. 10.1038/nature10508.
11. Mancera E., Bourgon R., Brozzi A., Huber W., Steinmetz L.M. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 2008, 454:479-485. 10.1038/nature07135.
12. Neale M.J., Pan J., Keeney S. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2005, 436:1053-1057. 10.1038/nature03872.
13. Carballo J.A., Panizza S., Serrentino M.E., Johnson A.L., Geymonat M., Borde V., et al. Budding yeast ATM/ATR control meiotic double-strand break (DSB) levels by down-regulating Rec114, an essential component of the DSB-machinery. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003545. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003545.
14. Robine N., Uematsu N., Amiot F., Gidrol X., Barillot E., Nicolas A., et al. Genome-wide redistribution of meiotic double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:1868-1880. 10.1128/MCB.02063-06.
15. Gray S., Allison R.M., Garcia V., Goldman A.S.H., Neale M.J. Positive regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation by activation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1(ATR). Open Biol. 2013, 3:130019. 10.1098/rsob.130019.
16. Rockmill B., Lefrançois P., Voelkel-Meiman K., Oke A., Roeder G.S., Fung J.C. High throughput sequencing reveals alterations in the recombination signatures with diminishing Spo11 activity. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003932. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003932.
17. Roeder G.S., Bailis J.M. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 2000, 16:395-403.
18. Lydall D., Nikolsky Y., Bishop D.K., Weinert T. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 1996, 383:840-843. 10.1038/383840a0.
19. Majka J., Burgers P.M.J. Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:2249-2254. 10.1073/pnas.0437148100.
20. Majka J., Niedziela-Majka A., Burgers P.M.J. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:891-901. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.027.
21. Xu L., Ajimura M., Padmore R., Klein C., Kleckner N. NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15:6572-6581.
22. Winter E. The Sum1/Ndt80 transcriptional switch and commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76:1-15. 10.1128/MMBR.05010-11.
23. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 2001, 106:47-57.
24. Tung K.S., Hong E.J., Roeder G.S. The pachytene checkpoint prevents accumulation and phosphorylation of the meiosis-specific transcription factor Ndt80. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:12187-12192. 10.1073/pnas.220464597.
25. Blitzblau H.G., Hochwagen A. ATR/Mec1 prevents lethal meiotic recombination initiation on partially replicated chromosomes in budding yeast. elife 2013, 2:e00844. 10.7554/eLife.00844.
26. Rockmill B., Roeder G.S. A meiosis-specific protein kinase homolog required for chromosome synapsis and recombination. Genes Dev. 1991, 5:2392-2404.
27. Usui T., Ogawa H., Petrini J.H. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:1255-1266.
28. Refolio E., Cavero S., Marcon E., Freire R., San-Segundo P.A. The Ddc2/ATRIP checkpoint protein monitors meiotic recombination intermediates. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:2488-2500. 10.1242/jcs.081711.
29. Carballo J.A., Johnson A.L., Sedgwick S.G., Cha R.S. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 2008, 132:758-770. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.035.
30. Wan L., de los Santos T., Zhang C., Shokat K., Hollingsworth N.M. Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic double strand break repair in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:11-23. 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0499.
31. Wojtasz L., Daniel K., Roig I., Bolcun-Filas E., Xu H., Boonsanay V., et al. Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000702. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702.
32. Argunhan B., Farmer S., Leung W.-K., Terentyev Y., Humphryes N., Tsubouchi T., et al. Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast. PLoS One 2013, 8:e65875. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065875.
33. Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2001, 52.
34. Xu L., Weiner B.M., Kleckner N. Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev. 1997, 11:106-118.
35. Shinohara M., Sakai K., Ogawa T., Shinohara A. The mitotic DNA damage checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24 are required for repair of double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Genetics 2003, 164:855-865.
36. Barlow C., Hirotsune S., Paylor R., Liyanage M., Eckhaus M., Collins F., et al. Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 1996, 86:159-171.
37. Barlow C., Liyanage M., Moens P.B., Tarsounas M., Nagashima K., Brown K., et al. Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development 1998, 125:4007-4017.
38. Xu Y., Ashley T., Brainerd E.E., Bronson R.T., Meyn M.S., Baltimore D. Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev. 1996, 10:2411-2422.
39. Barchi M., Roig I., Di Giacomo M., de Rooij D.G., Keeney S., Jasin M. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000076. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000076.
40. Boder E. Ataxia-telangiectasia: some historic, clinical and pathologic observations. Birth Defects Orig. Artic. Ser. 1975, 11:255-270.
41. Madigan J.P., Chotkowski H.L., Glaser R.L. DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:3698-3705.
42. Kleckner N.E., Storlazzi A., Zhang L., Kim K.P. Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:1353. 10.1073/pnas.1120345109.
43. Xu L., Kleckner N. Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J. 1995, 14:5115-5128.
44. Fukuda T., Kugou K., Sasanuma H., Shibata T., Ohta K. Targeted induction of meiotic double-strand breaks reveals chromosomal domain-dependent regulation of Spo11 and interactions among potential sites of meiotic recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:984-997. 10.1093/nar/gkm1082.
45. Renkawitz J., Lademann C.A., Kalocsay M., Jentsch S. Monitoring homology search during DNA double-strand break repair in vivo. Mol. Cell 2013, 50:261-272. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.020.
46. Cheng Y.-H., Chuang C.-N., Shen H.-J., Lin F.-M., Wang T.-F. Three distinct modes of Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM activation illustrate differential checkpoint targeting during budding yeast early meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33:3365-3376. 10.1128/MCB.00438-13.
47. Kleckner N., Zickler D., Jones G.H., Dekker J., Padmore R., Henle J., et al. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:12592-12597. 10.1073/pnas.0402724101.
48. Jones G.H., Franklin F.C.H. Meiotic crossing-over: obligation and interference. Cell 2006, 126:246-248. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.010.
49. Wu T.C., Lichten M. Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1995, 140:55-66.
50. Fan Q.Q., Xu F., White M.A., Petes T.D. Competition between adjacent meiotic recombination hotspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1997, 145:661-670.
51. Blat Y., Protacio R.U., Hunter N., Kleckner N. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 2002, 111:791-802.
52. Kleckner N. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 2006, 115:175-194. 10.1007/s00412-006-0055-7.
53. Panizza S., Mendoza M.A., Berlinger M., Huang L., Nicolas A., Shirahige K., et al. Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 2011, 146:372-383. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.003.
54. Borde V., Goldman A.S., Lichten M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 2000, 290:806-809.
55. Murakami H., Borde V., Shibata T., Lichten M., Ohta K. Correlation between premeiotic DNA replication and chromatin transition at yeast recombination initiation sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:4085-4090.
56. Mirkin E.V., Mirkin S.M. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71:13-35. 10.1128/MMBR.00030-06.
57. Marston A.L. Meiosis: DDK is not just for replication. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R74-R76. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.003.
58. M.D. Brown, D.B. Sacks, Protein scaffolds in MAP kinase signalling., Cell Signal. 21 (2009) 462-469. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.11.013.
59. Thacker D., Mohibullah N., Zhu X., Keeney S. Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution. Nature 2014, 10.1038/nature13120.
60. Hunter N. Hop1 and the meiotic DNA-damage response. Cell 2008, 132:731-732. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.026.
61. Börner G.V., Barot A., Kleckner N. Yeast Pch2 promotes domainal axis organization, timely recombination progression, and arrest of defective recombinosomes during meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:3327-3332. 10.1073/pnas.0711864105.
62. Börner G.V., Kleckner N., Hunter N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 2004, 117:29-45.
63. Chan A.C.-H., Borts R.H., Hoffmann E. Temperature-dependent modulation of chromosome segregation in msh4 mutants of budding yeast. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7284. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007284.
64. Abdullah M.F., Borts R.H. Meiotic recombination frequencies are affected by nutritional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:14524-14529. 10.1073/pnas.201529598.
65. Martini E., Borde V., Legendre M., Audic S., Regnault B., Soubigou G., et al. Genome-wide analysis of heteroduplex DNA in mismatch repair-deficient yeast cells reveals novel properties of meiotic recombination pathways. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002305. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002305.
66. V. Garcia, S. Gray, R.M. Allison, T.J. Cooper, M.J. Neale, Tel1/ATM-mediated interference suppresses clustered meiotic DSB formation, Nature, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13993.
67. H. Murakami, S. Keeney, Temporospatial coordination of meiotic DNA replication and recombination via DDK recruitment to replisomes. Cell 2014, Aug 14;158(4):861-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.028.