A General Connectionist Model of Attitude Structure and Change: The ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) Model

Psychological Review

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 733-759

  Monroe, Brian M ^a   Read, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

attitude structure; computer simulation; connectionist; neural network; social cognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATTITUDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 51449102397     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.733     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Abelson R.P., and Prentice D.A. Beliefs as possessions: A functional perspective. In: Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., and Greenwald A.G. (Eds). Attitude structure and function (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 361-381
2. Albarracín D., Wallace H.M., and Glasman L.R. Survival and change in judgments: A model of activation and comparison. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 36 (2004), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 251-315
3. Anderson C.A., Lepper M.R., and Ross L. Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 1037-1049
4. Anderson N.H. Foundations of information integration theory (1981), Academic Press, New York
5. Areni C.S. The proposition-probability model of argument structure and message acceptance. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2002) 168-187
6. Barnden J., and Srinivas K. Overcoming rule-based rigidity and connectionist limitations through massively-parallel case-based reasoning. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36 (1992) 221-246
7. Bassili J.N. Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 637-653
8. Bassili J.N., and Brown R.D. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
9. Biek M., Wood W., and Chaiken S. Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 547-556
10. Bizer G.Y., and Krosnick J.A. Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 566-586
11. Brehm J.W. Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 52 (1956) 384-389
12. Cacioppo J.T., and Petty R.E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 116-131
13. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 752-766
14. Chaiken S., and Baldwin M.W. Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (1981) 1-12
15. Chaiken S., Giner-Sorolla R., and Chen S. Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In: Gollwitzer P.M., and Bargh J.A. (Eds). The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (1996), Guilford Press, New York 553-578
16. Chaiken S., Liberman A., and Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: Uleman J.S., and Bargh J.A. (Eds). Unintended thought (1989), Guilford Press, New York 212-252
17. Chaiken S., and Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1994) 460-473
18. Chaiken S., and Yates S. Affective-cognitive consistency and thought-induced attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1985) 1470-1481
19. Chen S., and Chaiken S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999), Guilford Press, New York 73-96
20. Chen S., Schecter D., and Chaiken S. Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 262-275
21. Cohen J.B., and Reed A.I. A multiple pathway anchoring and adjustment (MPAA) model of attitude generation and recruitment. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2006) 1-15
22. Conrey F.M., and Smith E.R. Attitudes as patterns in a distributed, connectionist representational system. Social Cognition 25 (2007) 718-735
23. Crano W.D., and Prislin R. Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (2006) 345-374
24. Cunningham W.A., and Zelazo P.D. Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2007) 97-104
25. Dasgupta N., and Greenwald A.G. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 800-814
26. Eagly A.H., and Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes (1993), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, FL
27. Eagly A.H., and Chaiken S. Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 413-432
28. Eiser J.R., Fazio R.H., Stafford T., and Prescott T.J. Connectionist simulation of attitude learning: Asymmetries in the acquisition of positive and negative evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 1221-1235
29. Erber M.W., Hodges S.D., and Wilson T.D. Attitude strength, attitude stability, and the effects of analyzing reasons. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 433-454
30. Fabrigar L.R., MacDonald T.K., and Wegener D.T. The structure of attitudes. In: Albarracín D.A., Johnson B.T., and Zanna M.P. (Eds). The handbook of attitudes (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 79-124
31. Fazio R.H. How do attitudes guide behavior? (1986), Guilford Press, New York
32. Fazio R.H. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 23 (1990), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 75-109
33. Fazio R.H., Eiser J.R., and Shook N.J. Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 293-311
34. Fazio R.H., and Towles-Schwen T. The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999), Guilford Press, New York 97-116
35. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research (1975), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
36. Fishbein M., Ajzen I., and McArdle J. Changing the behavior of alcoholics: Effects of persuasive communication. In: Ajzen I., and Fishbein M. (Eds). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (1980), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 217-242
37. Gawronski B., and Bodenhausen G.V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin 132 (2006) 692-731
38. Gawronski B., and Strack F. On the nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 535-542
39. Greenwald A.G. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In: Greenwald A.G., Brock T.C., and Ostrom T.M. (Eds). Psychological foundations of attitudes (1968), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 147-170
40. Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 4-27
41. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., and Schwartz J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 1464-1480
42. Gregg A.P., Seibt B., and Banaji M.R. Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006) 1-20
43. Haugtvedt C.P., and Petty R.E. Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (1992) 308-319
44. Haugtvedt C.P., Shakarchi R.J., Samuelsen B.M., and Liu K. Consumer psychology and attitude change. In: Knowles E.S., and Linn J.A. (Eds). Resistance and persuasion (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 283-297
45. Haugtvedt C.P., and Wegener D.T. Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1994) 205-218
46. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations (1958), Wiley, New York
47. Holt L.E. Resistance to persuasion on explicit beliefs as a function of commitment to and desirability of logically related beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16 (1970) 583-591
48. Holt L.E., and Watts W.A. Salience of logical relationships among beliefs as a factor in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11 (1969) 193-203
49. Holyoak K.J., and Simon D. Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (1999) 3-31
50. Hopfield J.J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 79 (1982) 2554-2558
51. Hopfield J.J. Neurons with graded responses have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 81 (1984) 3088-3092
52. Johnson-Laird P.N., Girotto V., and Legrenzi P. Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 640-661
53. Jost J.T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A.W., and Sulloway F.J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129 (2003) 339-375
54. Judd C.M., Drake R.A., Downing J.W., and Krosnick J.A. Some dynamic properties of attitude structures: Context-induced response facilitation and polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1991) 193-202
55. Judd C.M., and Krosnick J.A. The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In: Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., and Greenwald A.G. (Eds). Attitude structure and function (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 99-128
56. Judd C.M., and Kulik J.A. Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (1980) 569-578
57. Judd C.M., and Lusk C.M. Knowledge structures and evaluative judgments: Effects of structural variables on judgmental extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1984) 1193-1207
58. Karpinski A., and Hilton J.L. Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 774-788
59. Kello C.T., Sibley D.E., and Plaut D.C. Dissociations in performance on novel versus irregular items: Single-route demonstrations with input gain in localist and distributed models. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 627-654
60. Krosnick J.A., Boninger D.S., Chuang Y.C., and Berent M.K. Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 1132-1151
61. Krosnick J.A., and Petty R.E. Attitude strength: An overview. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1-24
62. Kruglanski A.W., and Thompson E.P. Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry 10 (1999) 83-109
63. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (1990) 480-498
64. Kunda Z., and Thagard P. Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review 103 (1996) 284-308
65. Latané B., Nowak A., and Liu J.H. Measuring emergent social phenomena: Dynamism, polarization, and clustering as order parameters of social systems. Behavioral Science 39 (1994) 1-24
66. Lavine H., Thomsen C.J., and Gonzales M.H. The development of interattitudinal consistency: The shared-consequences model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 735-749
67. Lord C.G., Ross L., and Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 2098-2109
68. Lowery B.S., Hardin C.D., and Sinclair S. Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 842-855
69. Lusk C.M., and Judd C.M. Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 (1988) 105-126
70. McGuire W.J. Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60 (1960) 345-353
71. McGuire W.J. The structure of individual attitudes and attitude systems. In: Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., and Greenwald A.G. (Eds). Attitude structure and function (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 37-70
72. McGuire W.J., and McGuire C.V. The content, structure, and operation of thought systems. In: Wyer R.S., and Srull T.K. (Eds). Advances in social cognition 4 (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1-78
73. Millar M.G., and Tesser A. Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 259-269
74. Miller N., and Colman D.E. Methodological issues in analyzing the cognitive mediation of persuasion. In: Petty R.E., Ostrom T.M., and Brock T.C. (Eds). Cognitive responses in persuasion (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 105-126
75. Montoya J.A., and Read S.J. A constraint satisfaction model of the correspondence bias: The role of accessibility and applicability of explanations. In: Gernsbacher M.A., and Derry S.J. (Eds). Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
76. Nosek B.A., Banaji M., and Greenwald A.G. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration Web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (2002) 101-115
77. Nowak A. Dynamical minimalism: Why less is more in psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004) 183-192
78. Nowak A., Szamrej J., and Latané B. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 362-376
79. Olson M.A., and Fazio R.H. Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 413-417
80. O'Reilly R.C. The PDP++ software home page (2004). http://psych.colorado.edu/~oreilly/PDP++/PDP++.html Retrieved February 9, 2007, from the University of Colorado Psychology Department Web site: http://psych.colorado.edu/~oreilly/PDP++/PDP++.html
81. O'Reilly R.C., and Munakata Y. Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
82. Ostrom T.M., and Brock T.C. A cognitive model of attitudinal involvement. In: Abelson R.P., Aronson E., McGuire W.J., Newcomb T.M., Rosenberg M.J., and Tannenbaum P.H. (Eds). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (1968), Rand McNally, Chicago 373-383
83. Petty R.E. A metacognitive model of attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2006) 22-24
84. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1984) 69-81
85. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 19 (1986), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 123-205
86. Petty R.E., Harkins S.G., and Williams K.D. The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (1980) 81-92
87. Petty R.E., Haugtvedt C.P., and Smith S.M. Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 93-130
88. Petty R.E., Tormala Z.L., Briñol P., and Jarvis W.B.G. Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006) 21-41
89. Petty R.E., Wheeler S.C., and Bizer G.Y. Is there one persuasion process or more? Lumping versus splitting in attitude change theories. Psychological Inquiry 10 (1999) 156-163
90. Queller S., and Smith E.R. Subtyping versus bookkeeping in stereotype learning and change: Connectionist simulations and empirical findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 300-313
91. Read S.J., and Marcus-Newhall A. Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 429-447
92. Read S.J., and Miller L.C. Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. In: Schank R.C., and Langer E. (Eds). Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 209-235
93. Read, S. J., & Monroe, B. M. (2007). Modeling cognitive dissonance using a recurrent neural network model with learning. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California.
94. Read S.J., and Montoya J.A. An autoassociative model of causal reasoning and causal learning: Reply to Van Overwalle's (1998) critique of Read and Marcus-Newhall (1993). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 728-742
95. Read S.J., Vanman E.J., and Miller L.C. Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1 (1997) 26-53
96. Richeson J.A., and Nussbaum R.J. The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 417-423
97. Rokeach M. A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems. Journal of Social Issues 24 (1968) 13-33
98. Rosenberg M.J. Hedonism, inauthenticity, and other goads towards expansion of a consistency theory. In: Abelson R.P., Aronson E., McGuire W.J., Newcomb T.M., Rosenberg M.J., and Tannenbaum P.H. (Eds). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (1968), Rand McNally, Chicago 73-111
99. Rosenberg M.J., and Abelson R.P. An analysis of cognitive balancing. In: Hovland C.I., and Rosenberg M.J. (Eds). Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (1960), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT 112-163
100. Rydell R.J., and McConnell A.R. Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 995-1008
101. Schwarz N., and Bohner G. The construction of attitudes. In: Tesser A., and Schwarz N. (Eds). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (2001), Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA 436-457
102. Scott W.A. Attitude measurement. In: Lindzey G., and Aronson E. (Eds). Handbook of social psychology 2 (1968), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 204-273
103. Shestowsky D., Wegener D.T., and Fabrigar L.R. Need for cognition and interpersonal influence: Individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 1317-1328
104. Shultz T.R., and Lepper M.R. Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review 103 (1996) 219-240
105. Shultz T.R., Léveillé E., and Lepper M.R. Free choice and cognitive dissonance revisited: Choosing "lesser evils" versus "greater goods.". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (1999) 40-48
106. Siebler, F. (2002). Connectionist modeling of social judgment processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kent, Canterbury, England.
107. Simon D., Krawczyk D.C., and Holyoak K.J. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 331-336
108. Simon D., Snow C.J., and Read S.J. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (2004) 814-837
109. Smith E.R. What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 893-912
110. Smith E.R., and DeCoster J. Person perception and stereotyping: Simulation using distributed representations in a recurrent connectionist network. In: Read S.J., and Miller L.C. (Eds). Connectionist models of social reasoning and behavior (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 111-140
111. Smolensky P. Harmony in linguistic cognition. Cognitive Science 30 (2006) 779-801
112. Smolensky P., and Legendre G. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar-Vol. 1. Cognitive architecture (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
113. Smolensky P., and Legendre G. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar-Vol. 2. Linguistic and philosophical implications (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
114. Spellman B.A., Ullman J.B., and Holyoak K.J. A coherence model of cognitive consistency: Dynamics of attitude change during the Persian Gulf War. Journal of Social Issues 49 (1993) 147-165
115. Tesser A. Self-generated attitude change. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 11 (1978), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 289-338
116. Tesser A., and Leone C. Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (1977) 340-356
117. Tesser A., Martin L., and Mendolia M. The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 73-92
118. Tetlock P.E. Structure and function in political belief systems. In: Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., and Greenwald A.G. (Eds). Attitude structure and function (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 129-152
119. Thagard P. Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1989) 435-502
120. Thagard P. Coherence in thought and action (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
121. Thompson M.M., Zanna M.P., and Griffin D.W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 361-386
122. Vallacher R.R., Nowak A., Froehlich M., and Rockloff M. The dynamics of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2002) 370-379
123. Van Overwalle F., and Jordens K. An adaptive connectionist model of cognitive dissonance. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2002) 204-231
124. Van Overwalle F., and Siebler F. A connectionist model of attitude formation and change. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9 (2005) 231-274
125. Van Rooy D., Van Overwalle F., Vanhoomissen T., Labiouse C., and French R. A recurrent connectionist model of group biases. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 536-563
126. Watts W.A., and Holt L.E. Logical relationships among beliefs and timing as factors in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16 (1970) 571-582
127. Wegener D.T., Petty R.E., Smoak N.D., and Fabrigar L.R. Multiple routes to resisting attitude change. In: Knowles E.S., and Linn J.A. (Eds). Resistance and persuasion (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 13-38
128. Wilson T.D., Dunn D.S., Kraft D., and Lisle D.J. Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 22 (1989), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 287-343
129. Wilson T.D., and Hodges S.D. Attitudes as temporary constructions. In: Martin L.L., and Tesser A. (Eds). The construction of social judgments (1992), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 37-65
130. Wilson T.D., Lindsey S., and Schooler T.Y. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 101-126
131. Wittenbrink B., and Schwarz N. Implicit measures of attitudes (2007), Guilford Press, New York
132. Wood W. Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 798-810
133. Wood W., Kallgren C.A., and Preisler R.M. Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21 (1985) 73-85
134. Wood W., Rhodes N., and Biek M. Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 283-313
135. Wyer R.S.J., and Albarracín D. Belief formation, organization, and change: Cognitive and motivational influences (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ