Of two minds: Forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes

Psychological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 954-958

  Rydell, Robert J ^a   McConnell, Allen R ^b   Mackie, Diane M ^a   Strain, Laura M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; CONFLICT; CONTROL; EGO DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; REACTION TIME;

ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; REACTION TIME; SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33845331362     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01811.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process models in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
2. Fazio, R.H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M.S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 74-97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Fazio, R.H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R.E. Petty &"J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Fazio, R.H., & Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research; Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
5. Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
6. Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the prepositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes implicit but not explicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 535-542.
7. Gawronski, B., Strack, F., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (in press). Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and prepositional processes. In R.E. Petty, R.H. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds.), Attitudes; Insights from the new wave of implicit measures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
9. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
10. Jellison, W.A., McConnell, A.R., & Gabriel, S. (2004). Implicit and explicit measures of sexual orientation attitudes: Ingroup preferences and related behaviors and beliefs among gay and straight men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 629-642.
11. Kerpleman, J.A., & Himmelfarb, S. (1971). Partial reinforcement effects in attitude acquisition and counterconditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 301-305.
12. McClelland, J.L., McNaughton, B.L., & O'Reilly, R.C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
13. McConnell, A.R., &Leibold, J.M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.A.R.
14. McConnell, A.R., Sherman, S.J., & Hamilton, D.L (1994). Illusory correlations in the perception of groups: An extension of the distinctiveness based account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 414-429.
15. Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Sloman, S.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
17. Smith, E.R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
18. Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T.Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.