Distributive judgments under uncertainty: Paccioli's game revisited

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 546-558

  Krueger, Joachim ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAME THEORY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 0034543152     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.546     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2. Allison, S. T., Mackie, D. M., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Outcome biases in social perception: Implications for dispositional inference, attitude change, stereotyping, and social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 53-93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 35, 129-140.
4. Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 569-579.
5. Bazerman, M. H., White, S. B., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 39-43.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
8. Dawes, R. M. (1991). Probabilistic versus causal thinking. In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Vol. 1. Matters of public interest (pp. 235-264). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Dawes, R. M. (1993). Prediction of the future versus understanding of the past: A basic asymmetry. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 1-24.
10. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.
11. Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 497-548). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
12. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1993). Statistical prediction versus clinical prediction: Improving what works. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 351-367). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Diaconis, P., & Mosteller, F. (1989). Methods of studying coincidences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 853-861.
14. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1993). Bias and rationality. In K. I. Manktelow & D. E. Over (Eds.), Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives (pp. 6-30). London: Routledge.
15. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-299.
16. Fleming, J. H., & Darley, J. M. (1989). Perceiving choice and constraint: The effects of contextual and behavioral cues on attitude attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 27-40.
17. Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
18. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
19. Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617-638.
20. Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
21. Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295-314.
22. Gould, S. J. (1996). Full house. New York: Random House.
23. Hays, W. L. (1978). Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24. Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1989). Outcome feedback: Hindsight and information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 605-619.
25. HyperCard [Computer program]. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.
26. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
27. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kendall, M. G. (1956). Studies in the history of probability and statistics: II. Biometrika, 43, 1-14.
29. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 46-50.
30. Klar, Y., & Giladi, E. E. (1997). No one in my group can be below the group's average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 885-901.
31. Knight, G. P., & Chao, C. C. (1991). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values among 8-to 12-year-old siblings, friends, and acquaintances. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 201-211.
32. Krueger, J. (1998). The bet on bias: A foregone conclusion? Psycoloquy, 9(46). http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?9.46
33. Krueger, J. (2000). The projective perception of the social world: A building block of social comparison processes. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 323-351). New York: Plenum/Kluwer Academic.
34. Krueger, J. (in press). Individual differences and Pearson's r: Rationality revealed? Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
35. Reichenbach, H. (1951). The rise of empirical philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Rothbart, M., & Snyder, M. (1970). Confidence in the prediction and postdiction of an uncertain outcome. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 2, 38-43.
37. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188.
38. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
39. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105-110.
40. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
41. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
42. Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387-402.
43. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.