Mechanosensitive kinases regulate stiffness-induced cardiomyocyte maturation

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Young, Jennifer L ^a   Kretchmer, Kyle ^a   Ondeck, Matthew G ^c   Zambon, Alexander C ^b   Engler, Adam J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b San Diego   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN KINASE B;

ANIMAL; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CHICK EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HEART MUSCLE CELL; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE MICROARRAY;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CHICK EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MYOCYTES, CARDIAC; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-AKT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS; VASCULAR STIFFNESS;

EID: 84923303475     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06425     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L.&Discher, D. E. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell 126, 677-689 (2006).
2. Saha, K. et al. Substrate Modulus Directs Neural Stem Cell Behavior. Biophys J 95, 4426-4438 (2008).
3. Holle, A. W. & Engler, A. J. More than a feeling: discovering, understanding, and influencing mechanosensing pathways. Curr Op Biotechnol 22, 648-654 (2011).
4. Wang, W. et al. Tumor cells caught in the act of invading: their strategy for enhanced cell motility. Trends Cell Biol 15, 138-145 (2005).
5. Hay, E. D. Cell biology of extracellular matrix Hay, E. D. (ed.) xv-417 (Plenum Press, New York, 1981).
6. Nelson, C. M. & Bissell, M. J. Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 22, 287-309 (2006).
7. Montell, D. J. Morphogenetic cell movements: diversity from modular mechanical properties. Science 322, 1502-1505 (2008).
8. Jacot, J. G., McCulloch, A. D. & Omens, J. H. Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys J 95, 3479-3487 (2008).
9. Engler, A. J. et al. Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on amatrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. J Cell Sci 121, 3794-3802 (2008).
10. Peyton, S. R. & Putnam, A. J. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion. J Cell Physiol 204, 198-209 (2005).
11. Zaari, N., Rajagopalan, P., Kim, S. K., Engler, A. J. & Wong, J. Y. Photopolymerization in Microfluidic Gradient Generators: Microscale Control of Substrate Compliance to Manipulate Cell Response. Adv Mater 16, 2133-2137 (2004).
12. Huebsch, N. et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nature Mater 9, 518-526 (2010).
13. Shih, Y.-R. V., Tseng, K.-F., Lai, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H. & Lee, O. K. Matrix stiffness regulation of integrin-mediated mechanotransduction during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Miner Res 26, 730-738 (2011).
14. Ghosh, K. et al. Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials 28, 671-679 (2007).
15. Marklein, R. A. & Burdick, J. A. Spatially controlled hydrogel mechanics to modulate stem cell interactions. Soft Matter 6, 136-143 (2010).
16. Young, J. L. & Engler, A. J. Hydrogels with time-dependent material properties enhance cardiomyocyte differentiation in vitro. Biomaterials 32, 1002-1009 (2011).
17. Lutolf, M. P. & hubbell, J. A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnol 23, 47-55 (2005).
18. Deroanne, C. F., Lapiere, C. M. & Nusgens, B. V. In vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial cells by relaxation of the coupling extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton. Cardiovasc Res 49, 647-658 (2001).
19. Jacot, J. G., Martin, J. C. & Hunt, D. L. Mechanobiology of cardiomyocyte development. J Biomech 43, 93-98 (2010).
20. Discher, D. E., Mooney, D. J. & Zandstra, P. W. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324, 1673-1677 (2009).
21. Berry, M. F. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290, H2196-203 (2006).
22. Krieg, M. et al. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nature 10, 429-436 (2008).
23. Zamir, E. A. & Taber, L. A. Material Properties and Residual Stress in the Stage 12 Chick Heart During Cardiac Looping. J Biomech Eng 126, 823-830 (2004).
24. Wagner, M. & Siddiqui, M. A. Q. Signal Transduction in Early Heart Development (I): Cardiogenic Induction and Heart Tube Formation. Exp Biol Med 232, 852-865 (2007).
25. Wagner, M. & Siddiqui, M. A. Q. Signal Transduction in Early Heart Development (II): Ventricular Chamber Specification, Trabeculation, and Heart Valve Formation. Exp Biol Med 232, 866-880 (2007).
26. Bottcher, R. T. Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling during Early Vertebrate Development. Endocr Rev 26, 63-77 (2005).
27. Dailey, L., Ambrosetti, D.,Mansukhani, A. & Basilico, C. Mechanisms underlying differential responses to FGF signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16, 233-247 (2005).
28. Sheldahl, L. C. et al. Dishevelled activates Ca21 flux, PKC, and CamKII in vertebrate embryos. J Cell Biol 161, 769-777 (2003).
29. Pandur, P., Läsche, M., Eisenberg, L. M. & Kühl, M.Wnt-11 activation of a noncanonical Wnt signalling pathway is required for cardiogenesis. Nature 418, 636-641 (2002).
30. Schneider, V. A. & Mercola, M. Wnt antagonism initiates cardiogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev 15, 304-315 (2001).
31. Naito, A. T. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Akt Pathway Plays a Critical Role in Early Cardiomyogenesis by Regulating Canonical Wnt Signaling. Circ Res 97, 144-151 (2005).
32. Allen, D. G. & Kentish, J. C. The cellular basis of the length-tension relation in cardiac muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol 17, 821-840 (1985).
33. Gomez, J.-P., Potreau, D. & Raymond, G. Intracellular calcium transients from newborn rat cardiomyocytes in primary culture. Cell Calcium 15, 265-275 (1994).
34. Bu, G., Adams, H., Berbari, E. J. & Rubart, M. Uniform Action Potential Repolarization within the Sarcolemma of In Situ Ventricular Cardiomyocytes. Biophys J 96, 2532-2546 (2009).
35. McCain, M. L. & Parker, K. K. Mechanotransduction: the role of mechanical stress, myocyte shape, and cytoskeletal architecture on cardiac function. Pflugers Arch 462, 89-104 (2011).
36. Sanger, J. W.,Wang, J., Fan, Y.,White, J. & Sanger, J. M. Assembly and Dynamics of Myofibrils. J Biomed Biotech 2010, 1-8 (2010).
37. Hamburger, V. & Hamilton, H. L. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195, 231-272 (1992).
38. Pico, A. R. et al. Wiki Pathways: Pathway Editing for the People. PLoS Biol 6, e184 (2008).
39. Zambon, A. C. et al. GO-Elite: a flexible solution for pathway and ontology overrepresentation. Bioinformatics 28, 2209-2210 (2012).
40. Sussman, M. A. et al. Myocardial AKT: The Omnipresent Nexus. Physiol Rev 91, 1023-1070 (2011).
41. Kerkela, R. et al. Deletion of GSK-3b in mice leads to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy secondary to cardiomyoblast hyperproliferation. J Clin Invest 118, 3609 (2008).
42. Sero, J. E. et al. Paxillin Mediates Sensing of Physical Cues and Regulates Directional Cell Motility by Controlling Lamellipodia Positioning. PLoS ONE 6, e28303 (2011).
43. Alon, R. et al. a4b1-dependent adhesion strengthening under mechanical strain is regulated by paxillin association with the a4-cytoplasmic domain. J Cell Biol 171, 1073-1084 (2005).
44. Fujio, Y., Nguyen, T., Wencker, D., Kitsis, R. N. & Walsh, K. Akt Promotes Survival of Cardiomyocytes In Vitro and Protects Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mouse Heart. Circ 101, 660-667 (2000).
45. Pelham, R. J. & Wang, Y.-L. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. PNAS 94, 13661-13665 (1997).
46. Rafalski, V. A. et al. Expansion of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells following SIRT1 inactivation in the adult brain. Nature 15, 614-624 (2013).
47. Ring, D. B. et al. Selective Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Inhibitors Potentiate Insulin Activation of Glucose Transport and Utilization In Vitro and In Vivo. Diabetes 52, 588-595 (2003).
48. Collignon, J., Varlet, I. & Robertson, E. J. Relationship between asymmetric nodal expression and the direction of embryonic turning. Nature 381, 155-158 (1996).
49. Boettger, T., Wittler, L. & Kessel, M. FGF8 functions in the specification of the right body side of the chick. Curr Biol 9, 277-280 (1999).
50. Ramsdell, A. F. & Yost, H. J. Cardiac looping and the vertebrate left-right axis: antagonism of left-sided Vg1 activity by a right-sided ALK2-dependent BMP pathway. Dev 126, 5195-205 (1999).
51. Voronov, D. A., Alford, P. W., Xu, G. & Taber, L. A. The role of mechanical forces in dextral rotation during cardiac looping in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 272, 339-350 (2004).
52. Tobita, K., Schroder, E. A., Tinney, J. P., Garrison, J. B. & B, K. B. Regional passive ventricular stress-strain relations during development of altered loads in chick embryo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282, H2386-H2396 (2002).
53. Miller, C. E., Vanni, M. A., Taber, L. A. & B, K. B. Passive stress-strain measurements in the stage-16 and stage-18 embryonic chick heart. J Biomech Eng 119, 445-451 (1997).
54. Hanson, K. P. et al. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Extracellular Matrix Proteins in the Developing Murine Heart: A Blueprint for Regeneration. Tissue Eng PtA19, 1132-1143 (2013).
55. Gittenberger-De Groot, A. C. et al. Collagen type VI expression during cardiac development and in human fetuses with trisomy. 21. Anat Rec 275A, 1109-1116 (2003).
56. Bajaj, P., Tang, X., Saif, T. A. & Bashir, R. Stiffness of the substrate influences the phenotype of embryonic chicken cardiac myocytes. J Biomed Mater Res 95A, 1261-1269 (2010).
57. Poobalarahi, F., Baicu, C. F. & Bradshaw, A. D. Cardiac myofibroblasts differentiated in 3D culture exhibit distinct changes in collagen I production, processing, and matrix deposition. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291, H2924-H2932 (2006).
58. van Laake, L. W. et al. Extracellular matrix formation after transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci 67, 277-290 (2010).
59. Pontes Soares, C. et al. 2D and 3D-organized cardiac cells shows differences in cellular morphology, adhesion junctions, presence of myofibrils and protein expression. PLoS ONE 7, e38147 (2012).
60. Tiburcy, M. et al. Terminal Differentiation, Advanced Organotypic Maturation, andModeling of Hypertrophic Growth in Engineered Heart Tissue. Circ Res 109, 1105-1114 (2011).
61. McBeath, R., Pirone, D. M.,Nelson, C. M., Bhadriraju, K.&Chen, C. S. Cell Shape, Cytoskeletal Tension, and RhoA Regulate Stem Cell Lineage Commitment. Dev Cell 6, 483-495 (2004).
62. Lian, X. et al. Directed cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells by modulatingWnt/b-catenin signaling under fully defined conditions. Nature Protoc 8, 162-175.
63. Haq, S. et al. Differential Activation of Signal Transduction Pathways in Human Hearts With Hypertrophy Versus Advanced Heart Failure. Circ 103, 670-677 (2001).
64. Breitbach, M. et al. Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts. Blood 110, 1362-1369 (2007).
65. Trappmann, B. et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nature Mater 11, 642-649 (2012).
66. Tse, J. R. & Engler, A. J. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 47, 10.16.1-10.16.16 (2010).
67. Dabiri, G. A., Ayoob, J. C., Turnacioglu, K. K., Sanger, J. M. & Sanger, J. W. Use of green fluorescent proteins linked to cytoskeletal proteins to analyze myofibrillogenesis in living cells. Methods in Enzymology Conn,M. (ed.) 171-186 (Elsevier, New York, 1999).
68. Cheadle, C., Vawter, M. P., Freed, W. J. & Becker, K. G. Analysis of Microarray Data Using Z Score Transformation. J Mol Diagn 5, 73-81 (2010).
69. Botstein, D. et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genet 25, 25-29 (2000).