The complex jujube genome provides insights into fruit tree biology

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Liu, Meng Jun ^a,b   Zhao, Jin ^a   Cai, Qing Le ^c   Liu, Guo Cheng ^c   Wang, Jiu Rui ^a   Zhao, Zhi Hui ^a   Liu, Ping ^a   Dai, Li ^a   Yan, Guijun ^d   Wang, Wen Jiang ^b   Li, Xian Song ^b   Chen, Yan ^c   Sun, Yu Dong ^c   Liu, Zhi Guo ^a   Lin, Min Juan ^a   Xiao, Jing ^a   Chen, Ying Ying ^a   Li, Xiao Feng ^c   Wu, Bin ^c   Ma, Yong ^c   Jian, Jian Bo ^c   Yang, Wei ^c   Yuan, Zan ^a   Sun, Xue Chao ^a   Wei, Yan Li ^c   Yu, Li Li ^c   Zhang, Chi ^c   Liao, Sheng Guang ^c   He, Rong Jun ^c   Guang, Xuan Min ^c   Wang, Zhuo ^c   Zhang, Yue Yang ^c   Luo, Long Hai ^c   more..

^a AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY OF HEBEI   (China)

^b National Engineering Research Center for Agriculture in Northern Mountainous Areas   (China)

^c BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTOME;

CHROMOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; IDENTIFICATION KEY; NEW SPECIES; REGENERATION; TREE; VITAMIN;

ABIOTIC STRESS; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; BIOTIC STRESS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FRUIT; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; JUJUBE; NONHUMAN; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; PLANT STRESS; REGENERATION; RHAMNACEAE; SEGMENTAL DUPLICATION; SPECIES COMPARISON; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT; PLANT GENE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYNTENY; TREE; ZIZIPHUS;

RHAMNACEAE; ZIZIPHUS; ZIZIPHUS JUJUBA;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ASCORBIC ACID; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; FRUIT; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PLANT SHOOTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SYNTENY; TREES; ZIZIPHUS;

EID: 84923279603     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6315     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. James, E. R., Michael, F. F., Quentin, C. B. C., Diane, B. & Mark, W. C. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1309-1324 (2000).
2. Chen, Y. & Schirarend, C. Flora of China, 12 (Science Press, 2007).
3. Qu, Z. & Wang, Y. Chinese Fruit Trees Record-Chinese Jujube (China Forestry Publishing House, 1993).
4. Liu, M. China Jujube Development Report ,1949-2007 (China Forestry Publishing House, 2008).
5. Liu, M., Liu, P. & Liu, G. Advances of research on germplasm resources of Chinese jujube. Acta Hortic. 993, 15-20 (2013).
6. Liu, M. Chinese jujube: botany and horticulture. Hortic. Rev. 32, 229-298 (2006).
7. Yang, Y., Wang, G. & Pan, X. China Food Composition-Book1, 2nd edn (Peking Univ. Medical Press, 2009).
8. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161, 105-121 (2009).
9. Zhang, S., Solitis, D. E., Yang, Y., Li, D. & Yi, T. Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of rosales. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 60, 21-28 (2011).
10. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 794-815 (2000).
11. Li, R. et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 20, 265-272 (2010).
12. Zhang, G. et al. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 490, 49-54 (2012).
13. You, M. et al. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat. Genet. 45, 220-225 (2013).
14. Wu, J. et al. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res. 23, 396-408 (2013).
15. The International Peach Genome Initiative. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat. Genet. 45, 487-494 (2013).
16. Velasco, R. et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.). Nat. Genet. 42, 833-839 (2010).
17. Yanai, I. et al. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics 21, 650-659 (2005).
18. He, N. et al. Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nat. Commun. 4, 2445 (2013).
19. Zhang, Q. et al. The genome of Prunus mume. Nat. Commun. 3, 1318 (2012).
20. Bell, C. D., Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S. The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am. J. Bot. 97, 1296-1303 (2010).
21. Magallón, S. A. Flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). in The Timetree of Life (eds Hedges, S. B. & Kumar, S.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).
22. Calvillo-Canadel, L. & Sergio, R. S. Cevallos-Ferriz. Reproductive structures of Rhamnaceae from the Cerro Del Pueblo (Late Cretaceous, Coahuila) and Coatzingo (Oligocene, Puebla) Formations, Mexico. Am. J. Bot. 94, 1658-1669 (2007).
23. Richardson, J. E. et al. A revision of the tribal classification of Rhamnaceae. Kew Bull. 55, 311-340 (2000).
24. Bishop, J. G., Dean, A. M. & Mitchell-Olds, T. Rapid evolution in plant chitinases: molecular targets of selection in plant-pathogen coevolution. PNAS 97, 5322-5327 (2000).
25. Punja, Z. K. & Zhang, Y. Plant chitinases and their roles in resistance to fungal diseases. J. Nematol. 25, 526-540 (1993).
26. Levine, B. & Klionsky, D. J. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev. Cell 6, 463-477 (2004).
27. Schatz, M. C., Witkowski, J. & McCombie, W. R. Current challenges in de novo plant genome sequencing and assembly. Genome Biol. 13, 243 (2012).
28. Miller, A. J. & Gross, B. L. From forest to field: perennial fruit crop domestication. Am. J. Bot. 98, 1389-1414 (2011).
29. Petit, R. J. & Hampe, A. Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 187-214 (2006).
30. Khan, M. A. & Korban, S. Association mapping in forest trees and fruit crops. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 4045-4060 (2012).
31. Xu, Q. et al. The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Nat. Genet. 45, 59-66 (2013).
32. Huang, S. et al. Draft genome of the kiwifruit Actinidia chinensis. Nat. Commun. 4, 264 (2013).
33. Dai, L., Zhao, J. & Liu, M. Tissue culture of chinese jujube using different explants. Acta Hort. 840, 293-296 (2009).
34. Zhou, R. & Liu, M. Establishment of high-efficient in vitro leaf regeneration system in Chinese jujube. Acta Hort. Sin. 33, 625-628 (2006).
35. Qi, Y. & Liu, M. Factors influencing young embryo culture of Chinese jujube. J. Fruit Sci. 11, 25-28 (2004).
36. Zhang, G. et al. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 490, 49-54 (2012).
37. You, M. et al. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat. Genet. 45, 220-225 (2013).
38. Boetzer, M. et al. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27, 578-579 (2011).
39. Li, R. et al. SOAP2: An improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25, 1966-1967 (2009).
40. Li, R. et al. SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 19, 1124-1132 (2009).
41. Grattapaglia, D. & Sederoff, R. R. Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudo-testcross mapping strategy and RAPD markers. Genetics 137, 1121-1137 (1994).
42. Van Ooijen, J. W. JoinMap:emoji: 4, Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations (ed. Kyazma, B. V.) (Wageningen, The Netrherlands, 2006).
43. Jurka, J. et al. Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462-467 (2005).
44. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573-580 (1999).
45. Smit, A. F. A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker. http://www.repeatmasker.org.
46. Edgar, R. C. & Myers, E. W. Piler: identification and classification of genomic repeats. Bioinformatics 21, i152-i158 (2005).
47. Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21, i351-i358 (2005).
48. Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR-FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of fulllength LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265-W268 (2007).
49. Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402 (1997).
50. Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988-995 (2004).
51. Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435-W439 (2006).
52. Salamov, A. A. & Solovyev, V. V. Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 10, 516-522 (2000).
53. Elsik, C. G. et al. Creating a honey bee consensus gene set. Genome Biol. 8, R13 (2007).
54. Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511-515 (2010).
55. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27-30 (2000).
56. Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 45-48 (2000).
57. Zdobnov, E. M. & Apweiler, R. InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17, 847-848 (2001).
58. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
59. Li, L., Stoeckert, Jr C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178-2189 (2003).
60. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755 (2001).
61. Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586-1591 (2007).
62. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644-652 (2011).
63. Zhang, J., Nielsen, R. & Yang, Z. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2472-2479 (2005).
64. Wilson, A. M., Work, T. M. & Bushway, A. A. HPLC determination of fructose, glucose, and sucrose in potatoes. J. Food Sci. 46, 300-301 (1981).
65. Yemm, E. W. & Willis, A. J. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57, 508-514 (1954).