Polarizable force fields for molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 241-254

  Baker, Christopher M ^a  

^a JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULES; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MOLECULES; POLARIZATION;

BIOMOLECULAR SYSTEM; COMPUTING POWER; ENERGY FUNCTIONS; EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; POLARIZABILITIES; POLARIZABLE FORCE FIELD; SIMULATION SOFTWARE;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 84923106614     PISSN: 17590876     EISSN: 17590884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1215     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 2002, 9:646-652.
2. Macleod NA, Butz P, Simons JP, Grant GH, Baker CM, Tranter GE. Electronic circular dichroism spectroscopy of 1-(R)-phenylethanol: the "sector rule" revisited and an exploration of solvent effects. Isr J Chem 2004, 44:27-36.
3. Baker CM, Grant GH. A solvent induced mechanism for conformational change. Chem Commun 2006, 1387-1389.
4. Baker CM, Grant GH. The effect of solvation on biomolecular conformation: 2-amino-1-phenylethanol. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111:9940-9954.
5. Klepeis JL, Lindorff-Larsen K, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:120-127.
6. Laughton CA, Harris SA. The atomistic simulation of DNA. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011, 1:590-600.
7. Cheatham TE III, Case DA. Twenty-five years of nucleic acid simulations. Biopolymers 2013, 99:969-977.
8. Freddolino PL, Arkhipov AS, Larson SB, McPherson A, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus. Structure 2006, 14:437-449.
9. Ode H, Nakashima M, Kitamura S, Sugiura W, Sato H. Molecular dynamics simulation in virus research. Front Microbiol 2012, 3:258.
10. Larsson DSD, Liljas L, van der Spoel D. Virus capsid dissolution studied by microsecond molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002502.
11. MacKerell AD Jr. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1584-1604.
12. Lide DR, ed. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 84th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003.
13. Gregory JK, Clary DC, Liu K, Brown MG, Saykally RJ. The water dipole moment in water clusters. Science 1997, 275:814-817.
14. Badyal YS, Saboungi M-L, Price DL, Shastri SD, Haeffner DR, Soper AK. Electron distribution in water. J Chem Phys 2000, 112:9206-9208.
15. Williams DE. Alanyl dipeptide potential-derived net atomic charges and bond dipoles, and their variation with molecular conformation. Biopolymers 1990, 29:1367-1386.
16. Hensen C, Hermann JC, Nam K, Ma S, Gao J, Höltje H-D. A combined QM/MM approach to protein-ligand interactions: polarization effects of the HIV-1 protease on selected high affinity inhibitors. J Med Chem 2004, 47:6673-6680.
17. Warschel A, Kato M, Pisliakov AV. Polarizable force fields: history, test cases, and prospects. J Chem Theory Comput 2007, 3:2034-2045.
18. SciFinder; Chemical Abstract Service: Columbus, OH, 2014. (Accessed October 14, 2014). https://scifinder.cas.org
19. Brooks BR, Brooks CL III, MacKerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009, 30:1545-1614.
20. Salomon-Ferrer R, Case DA, Walker RC. An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2013, 3:198-210.
21. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kalé L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005, 26:1781-1802.
22. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 2005, 26:1701-1718.
23. Cieplak P, Dupradeau F-Y, Duan Y, Wang J. Polarization effects in molecular mechanical force fields. J Phys Condens Matter 2009, 21:333102.
24. Lopes PEM, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Molecular modeling and dynamics studies with explicit inclusion of electronic polarizability: theory and applications. Theor Chem Acc 2009, 124:11-28.
25. Antila HS, Salonen E. Polarizable force fields. In: Monticelli L, Salonen E, eds. Biomolecular Simulations: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 924. New York, NY: Springer; 2013, 215-241.
26. Mortier WJ, Ghosh SK, Shankar S. Electronegativity-equalization method for the calculation of atomic charges in molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1986, 108:4315-4320.
27. Vinter JG. Extended electron distributions applied to the molecular mechanics of some intermolecular interactions. J Comput Aid Mol Des 1994, 8:653-668.
28. Dixon RW, Kollman PA. Advancing beyond the atom-centered model in additive and nonadditive molecular mechanics. J Comput Chem 1997, 18:1632-1646.
29. Baker CM, Grant GH. The structure of liquid benzene. J Chem Theory Comput 2006, 2:947-955.
30. Baker CM, Grant GH. Modeling aromatic liquids: toluene, phenol and pyridine. J Chem Theory Comput 2007, 3:530-548.
31. Rendine S, Pieraccini S, Forni A, Sironi M. Halogen bonding in ligand-receptor systems in the framework of classical force fields. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13:19508-19516.
32. Bauer BA, Patel S. Recent applications and developments of charge equilibration force fields for modeling dynamical charges in classical molecular dynamics simulations. Theor Chem Acc 2012, 131:1153.
33. Lucas TR, Bauer BA, Patel S. Charge equilibration force fields for molecular dynamics simulations of lipids, bilayers, and integral membrane protein systems. BBA-Biomembranes 2012, 1818:318-329.
34. Lamoureux G, Roux B. Modeling induced polarization with classical Drude oscillators: theory and molecular dynamics simulation algorithm. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:3025-3039.
35. Lamoureux G, MacKerell AD Jr, Roux B. A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:5185-5197.
36. Yu H, van Gunsteren WF. Accounting for polarization in molecular simulation. Comput Phys Commun 2005, 172:69-85.
37. Lopes PEM, Huang J, Shim J, Luo Y, Li H, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Polarizable force field for peptides and proteins based on the classical Drude oscillator. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:5430-5449.
38. Savelyev A, MacKerell AD Jr. All-atom polarizable force field for DNA based on the classical Drude oscillator model. J Comput Chem 2014, 35:1219-1239.
39. Chowdhary J, Harder E, Lopes PEM, Huang L, MacKerell AD Jr, Roux B. A polarizable force field of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine based on the classical Drude model for molecular dynamics simulations of lipids. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:9142-9160.
40. Davis ME, McCammon JA. Electrostatics in biomolecular structure and dynamics. Chem Rev 1990, 90:509-521.
41. Maple JR, Cao Y, Damm W, Halgren TA, Kaminski GA, Zhang LY, Friesner RA. A polarizable force field and continuum solvation methodology for modeling of protein-ligand interactions. J Chem Theory Comput 2005, 1:694-715.
42. Ma B, Lii J-H, Allinger NL. Molecular polarizabilities and induced dipole moments in molecular mechanics. J Comput Chem 2000, 21:813-825.
43. Cieplak P, Caldwell J, Kollman P. Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: aqueous solution free energies of methanol and N-methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases. J Comput Chem 2001, 22:1048-1057.
44. Cardamone S, Hughes TJ, Popelier PLA. Multipolar electrostatics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014, 16:10367-10387.
45. Ren P, Ponder JW. Polarizable atomic multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107:5933-5947.
46. Ponder JW, Wu C, Ren P, Pande VS, Chodera JD, Schnieders MJ, Haque I, Mobley DL, Lambrecht DS, DiStasio RA Jr, et al. Current status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field. J Phys Chem B 2010, 114:2549-2564.
47. Shi Y, Xia Z, Zhang J, Best R, Wu C, Ponder JW, Ren P. Polarizable atomic multipole-based AMOEBA force field for proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:4046-4063.
48. Jiao D, Golubkov PA, Darden TA, Ren P. Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:6290-6295.
49. Jiao D, Zhang J, Duke RE, Li G, Schnieders MJ, Ren P. Trypsin-ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential. J Comput Chem 2009, 30:1701-1711.
50. Wang Z-X, Zhang W, Wu C, Lei H, Cieplak P, Duan Y. Strike a balance: optimization of backbone torsion parameters of AMBER polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides. J Comput Chem 2006, 27:781-790.
51. Zuo Z, Gandhi NS, Mancera RL. Calculations of the free energy of interaction of the c-Fos - c-Jun coiled coil: effects of the solvation model and the inclusion of polarization effects. J Chem Inf Model 2010, 50:2201-2212.
52. Doemer M, Guglielmi M, Athri P, Nagornova NS, Rizzo TR, Boyarkin OV, Tavernelli I, Rothlisberger U. Assessing the performance of computational methods for the prediction of the ground state of a cyclic decapeptide. Int J Quant Chem 2013, 113:808-814.
53. Patel S, Brooks CL III. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1-15.
54. Patel S, MacKerell AD Jr, Brooks CL III. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1504-1514.
55. Kucukkal TG, Stuart SJ. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations of aqueous dipeptides. J Phys Chem B 2012, 116:8733-8740.
56. Huang J, Lopes PEM, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Recent advances in polarizable force fields for macromolecules: microsecond simulations of proteins using the classical Drude oscillator model. J Phys Chem Lett 2014, 5:3144-3150.
57. 2 decamer in crystal environment: comparison of atomic point-charge, extra-point and polarizable force fields. J Chem Phys 2004, 121:6998-7008.
58. Babin V, Baucom J, Darden TA, Sagui C. Molecular dynamics simulations of polarizable DNA in crystal environment. Int J Quant Chem 2006, 106:3260-3269.
59. Babin V, Baucom J, Darden TA, Sagui C. Molecular dynamics simulations of DNA with polarizable force fields: convergence of an ideal B-DNA structure to the crystallographic structure. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110:11571-11581.
60. Várnai P, Zakrzewska K. DNA and its counterions: a molecular dynamics study. Nucl Acids Res 2004, 32:4269-4280.
61. Pérez A, Marchán I, Svozil D, Sponer J, Cheatham TE III, Laughton CA, Orozco M. Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of α/γ conformers. Biophys J 2007, 92:3817-3829.
62. Zgarbová M, Luque FJ, Šponer J, Cheatham TE III, Otyepka M, Jurečka P. Toward improved description of DNA backbone: revisiting epsilon and zeta torsion force field parameters. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:2339-2354.
63. Baker CM, MacKerell AD Jr. Polarizability rescaling and atom-based Thole scaling in the CHARMM Drude polarizable force field for ethers. J Mol Model 2010, 16:567-576.
64. Baker CM, Anisimov VM, MacKerell AD Jr. Development of CHARMM polarizable force field for nucleic acid bases based on the classical Drude oscillator model. J Phys Chem B 2011, 115:580-596.
65. Hart K, Foloppe N, Baker CM, Denning EJ, Nilsson L, MacKerell AD Jr. Optimization of the CHARMM additive force field for DNA: improved treatment of the BI/BII conformational equilibrium. J Chem Theory Comput 2012, 8:348-362.
66. Savelyev A, MacKerell AD Jr. Balancing the interactions of ions, water, and DNA in the Drude polarizable force field. J Phys Chem B 2014, 118:6742-6757.
67. Lemkul JA, Savelyev A, MacKerell AD Jr. Induced polarization influences the fundamental forces in DNA base flipping. J Phys Chem Lett 2014, 5:2077-2083.
68. Baker CM, Darien E, MacKerell AD Jr. Towards biomolecular simulations with explicit inclusion of polarizability: development of a CHARMM polarizable force field based on the classical Drude oscillator model. In: Schlick T, ed. Innovations in Biomolecular Modeling and Simulations, vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: RSC Publications; 2012, 23-50.
69. White SH, Wimley WC. Hydrophobic interactions of peptides with membrane interfaces. BBA-Rev Biomembranes 1998, 1376:339-352.
70. Wiener MC, White SH. Structure of a fluid dioleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer determined by joint refinement of x-ray and neutron diffraction data. II. Distribution and packing of terminal methyl groups. Biophys J 1992, 61:428-433.
71. Charifson PS, Hiskey RG, Pedersen LG. Construction and molecular modeling of phospholipid surfaces. J Comput Chem 1990, 11:1181-1186.
72. Patel S, Davis JE, Bauer BA. Exploring ion permeation energetics in gramicidin A using polarizable charge equilibration force fields. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131:13890-13891.
73. Davis JE, Patel S. Charge equilibration force fields for lipid environments: applications to fully hydrated DPPC bilayers and DMPC-embedded gramicidin A. J Phys Chem B 2009, 113:9183-9196.
74. Bauer BA, Lucas TR, Meninger DJ, Patel S. Water permeation through DMPC lipid bilayers using polarizable charge equilibration force fields. Chem Phys Lett 2011, 508:289-294.
75. Lucas TR, Bauer BA, Davis JE, Patel S. Molecular dynamics simulation of hydrated DPPC monolayers using charge equilibration force fields. J Comput Chem 2011, 33:141-152.
76. Ou S, Lucas TR, Zhong Y, Bauer BA, Hu Y, Patel S. Free energetics and the role of water in the permeation of methyl guanidinium across the bilayer-water interface: insights from molecular dynamics simulations using charge equilibration potentials. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:3578-3592.
77. Allen TW, Andersen OS, Roux B. Ion permeation through a narrow channel: using gramicidin to ascertain all-atom molecular dynamics potential of mean force methodology and biomolecular force fields. Biophys J 2006, 90:3447-3468.
78. Dorairaj S, Allen TW. On the thermodynamic stability of a charged arginine side chain in a transmembrane helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:4943-4948.
79. Vorobyov I, Li L, Allen TW. Assessing atomistic and coarse-grained force fields for protein-lipid interactions: the formidable challenge of an ionizable side chain in a membrane. J Phys Chem B 2008, 112:9588-9602.
80. Siu SWI, Vácha R, Jungwirth P, Böckmann RA. Biomolecular simulations of membranes: physical properties from different force fields. J Chem Phys 2008, 128:125103.
81. Harder E, MacKerell AD Jr, Roux B. Many-body polarization effects and the membrane dipole potential. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131:2760-2761.
82. Robinson D. A polarizable force-field for cholesterol and sphingomyelin. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:2498-2503.
83. Foley BL, Tessier MB, Woods RJ. Carbohydrate force fields. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2012, 2:652-697.
84. Bochevarov AD, Harder E, Hughes TF, Greenwood JR, Braden DA, Philipp DM, Rinaldo D, Halls MD, Zhang J, Friesner RA. Jaguar: a high-performance quantum chemistry software program with strengths in life and materials sciences. Int J Quantum Chem 2013, 113:2110-2142.
85. Woods RJ. Three-dimensional structures of oligosaccharides. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:591-598.
86. Woods RJ, Tessier MB. Computational glycoscience: characterizing the spatial and temporal properties of glycans and glycan-protein complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010, 20:575-583.
87. He X, Lopes PEM, Mackerell AD Jr. Polarizable empirical force field for acyclic polyalcohols based on the classical Drude oscillator. Biopolymers 2013, 99:724-738.
88. Patel DS, He X, MacKerell AD Jr. Polarizable empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides based on the classical Drude oscillator. J Phys Chem B. In press.
89. Zhong Y, Bauer BA, Patel S. Solvation properties of N-acetyl-β-glucosamine: Molecular dynamics study incorporating electronic polarization. J Comput Chem 2011, 32:3339-3353.
90. Zhong Y, Patel S. Binding structures of tri-N-acetyl-β-glucosamine in hen egg white lysozyme using molecular dynamics with a polarizable force field. J Comput Chem 2013, 34:163-174.
91. Baker CM, Lopes PEM, Zhu X, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Accurate calculation of hydration free energies using pair-specific Lennard-Jones parameters in the CHARMM Drude polarizable force field. J Chem Theory Comput 2010, 6:1181-1198.
92. Krämer A, Hülsmann M, Köddermann T, Reith D. Automated parameterization of intermolecular pair potentials using global optimization techniques. Comput Phys Commun 2014, 185:3228-3239.
93. Betz RM, Walker RC. Paramfit: automated optimization of force field parameters for molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2015, 36:79-87.
94. Wang L-P, Martinez TJ, Pande VS. Building force fields: an automatic, systematic, and reproducible approach. J Phys Chem Lett 2014, 5:1885-1891.
95. Wang L-P, Head-Gordon T, Ponder JW, Ren P, Chodera JD, Eastman PK, Martinez TJ, Pande VS. Systematic improvement of a classical molecular model of water. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:9956-9972.
96. Huang L, Roux B. Automated force field parameterization for nonpolarizable and polarizable atomic models based on ab initio target data. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:3543-3556.
97. Best RB. Atomistic molecular simulations of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2012, 22:52-61.
98. Baker CM, Best RB. Insights into the binding of intrinsically disordered proteins from molecular dynamics simulation. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2014, 4:182-198.
99. Barducci A, Pfaendtner J, Bonomi M. Tackling sampling challenges in Biomolecular simulations. In: Molecular Modeling of Proteins, vol. 1. New York, NY: Springer; 2015, 151-171.
100. Baker CM, Best RB. Matching of additive and polarizable force fields for multiscale condensed phase simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:2826-2837.
101. Jorgensen WL. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science 2004, 303:1813-1818.
102. Borhani DW, Shaw DE. The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2012, 26:15-26.
103. Wang L, Deng Y, Knight JL, Wu Y, Kim B, Sherman W, Shelley JC, Lin T, Abel R. Modeling local structural rearrangements using FEP/REST: application to relative binding affinity predictions of CDK2 inhibitors. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:1282-1293.
104. Zhang J, Shi Y, Ren P. Polarizable force fields for scoring protein-ligand interactions. In: Gohlke H, ed. Protein-Ligand Interactions. 1st ed. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2012, 101-120.