Confucian constitutionalism? The emergence of constitutional review in Korea and Taiwan

Law and Social Inquiry

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 763-799

  Ginsburg, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042670025     PISSN: 08976546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2002.tb00981.x     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Abel, Richard. 1982. Law as Lag: Inertia as a Social Theory of Law. Michigan Law Review 80:785-809.
2. Ahn, Kyong Whan. 1994. The Growth of the Bar and the Changes in the Lawyer's Role: Korea's Dilemma. In Law and Technology in the Pacific Community, ed. Philip S. C. Lewis. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
3. _. 1998. The Influence of American Constitutionalism on South Korea. Southern Illinois Law Journal 22:71-115.
4. Ainsworth, Janet E. 1996. Categories and Culture: On the "Rectification of Names" in Comparative Law. Cornell Law Review 82:19-42.
5. Allee, Mark A. 1994. Law and Local Society in Late Imperial China. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
6. Bailey, William Somers. 1997. Reducing Malapportionment in Japan's Electoral Districts: The Supreme Court Must Act. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6:169-98.
7. Bauer, Joanne, and Daniel Bell. 1999. The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Beer, Lawrence Ward. 1979. Constitutionalism in Asia: Asian Views of American Influence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
9. Beresford, Melanie. 1995. Review of Vietnam and the Rule of Law, by Carlyle Thayer and David Marr. Journal of Asian Studies 54:910-12.
10. Bernhardt, Kathryn, and Philip C. C. Huang. 1994. Civil Law in Qing and Republican China. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
11. Bodde, Derk, and Clarence Morris. 1967. Law in Imperial China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
12. Cappelletti, Mauro. 1989. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
13. Chan, Johannes. 1999. Judicial Independence: Controversies on the Constitutional Jurisdiction of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. International Lawyer 33:1015-23.
14. Chang, Wen-Chen. 2001. Transition to Democracy, Constitutionalism and Judicial Activism. S.J.D. diss., Yale University.
15. Chao, Linda, and Ramon Myers. 1998. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Chiu, Hungdah. 1993. Constitutional Development and Reform in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Issues and Studies 29:1-38.
17. Cho, Kuk. 1997. Tension between the National Security Law and Constitutionalism in South Korea: Security for What? Boston University International Law Journal 15:125-74.
18. Choi, Dae-Kwon. 1980. Development of Law and Legal Institutions in Korea. In Bong Duck Chun, William Shaw, and Choi Dae-Kwon, Traditional Korean Legal Attitudes. Korea Research Monograph no. 2. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of East Asian Studies.
19. Clark, Donald, ed. 1988. The Kwangju Uprising: Shadows over the Regime in South Korea. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
20. Cooney, Scan. 1996. The New Taiwan and Its Old Labour Law: Authoritarian Legislation in a Democratised Society. Comparative Labor Law Journal 18:1-61.
21. _. 1997. Taiwan's Emerging Liberal Democracy and the New Constitutional Review. In Asian Laws through Australian Eyes, ed. Veronica Taylor. Sydney: LBC Publishing.
22. Davis, Michael. 1998a. The Price of Rights: Constitutionalism and East Asian Economic Development. Human Rights Quarterly 20: 303-37.
23. _. 1998b. Constitutionalism and Political Culture: The Debate over Human Rights and Asian Values. Harvard Human Rights Law Journal 11:109-47.
24. De Bary, William Theodore, and JaHyun Kim Haboush. 1985. The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. De Bary, William Theodore, and Tu Weiming. 1998. Confucianism and Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
26. Ewald, William. 1995. Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants. American Journal of Comparative Law 43:489-510.
27. Feldman, Eric. 2000. The Ritual of Rights in Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
29. Fukuyama, Francis. 2001. Confucianism and Democracy. In The Global Divergence of Democracy, ed. Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Gewirtz, Paul. 2001. Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation: Comparative Constitutionalism and Chinese Characteristics. Hong Kong Law Journal 31:200-223.
31. Ginsburg, Tom. 2000. Does Law Matter for Economic Development? Evidence from East Asia. Law and Society Review 34:829-56.
32. Grand Justices and Constitutional Court of the Republic of China. 1995. Taipei: Judicial Yuan.
33. Hahm, Pyong-choon. 1986. Korean Jurisprudence, Politics and Culture. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
34. Hamilton, Gary, and Cheng-shu Kao. 1986. Max Weber and the Analysis of Asian Industrialization. University California-Davis, Research Program in East Asian Culture and Development, working paper no. 2.
35. Huang, Philip C. C. 1996. Civil Justice in China: Representation and Practice in the Qing. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
36. Huntington, Samuel. 1997. After Twenty Years: The Future of the Third Wave. Journal of Democracy 8:3-12.
37. Jones, Carol. 1994. Capitalism, Globalization and the Rule of Law: An Alternative Trajectory of Legal Change in China. Social and Legal Studies 3:195-221.
38. Kagan, Robert. 1991. Adversarial Legalism in American Government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10:375-406.
39. _. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
40. Kagan, Robert, and Lee Axelrad. 2000. Regulatory Encounters. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
41. Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
42. Keith, Ronald. 1994. China's Struggle for the Rule of Law. New York: St. Martin's Press.
43. Kenney, Sally J., William M. Reisinger, and John C. Reitz. 1999. Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective, New York: St. Martin's Press.
44. King, Ambrose. 1996. State Confucianism and Its Transformation in Taiwan. In Tu 1996.
45. Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Kommers, Donald. 1997. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2d ed. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
47. Ma, Herbert Han-pao. 1998. The Rule of Law in a Contemporary Confucian Society: A Reinterpretation. Paper presented at Harvard Law School's East Asian Legal Studies Program.
48. Nathan, Andrew J. 1985. Chinese Democracy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
49. Palais, James B. 1996. Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hyongwon and the Late Choson Dynasty. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
50. Petchsiri, Apirat. 1987. The Eastern Importation of Western Criminal Law. Littleton, Colo.: Fred B. Rothman.
51. Pye, Lucien. 1985. Asian Power and Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.
52. Sang, Hyun Song. 1983. Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Korea. Seoul: Kyung Mun Sa Publishing.
53. Schwartz, Benjamin. 1987. The Primacy of Political Order in East Asian Societies: Some Preliminary Generalizations. In Foundations and Limits of State Power in China, ed. Stuart Schram. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
54. Seow, Francis T. 1990. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Rights in Singapore Have Been Eroded. Index On Censorship 19:3-8.
55. _. 1995. A Free and Flippant Media. Media Studies Journal 9:77-81.
56. Shaw, William. 1981. Legal Norms in a Confucian State. Korea Research Monograph no. 5. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of East Asian Studies.
57. Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Tate, Neal, and Thorsten Vallinder. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: NYU Press.
59. Teik, Khoo Boo. 1999. Between Law and Politics: The Malaysian Judiciary since Independence. In Law Capitalism and Power in Asia, ed. Kanishka Jayasuriya. London: Routledge.
60. Trubek, David. 1996. Law and Development: Then and Now. American Society of International Law Proceedings 90:223-28.
61. Tu, Wei-ming, ed. 1996. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
62. Unger, Roberto. 1976. Law In Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.
63. Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
64. Volcansek, Mary. 1994. Political Power and Judicial Review in Italy. Comparative Political Studies 26:492-509.
65. Watson, Alan. 1991. Legal Origins and Legal Change. London: Hambledon Press.
66. _. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2d ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
67. Weber, Max. 1951. The Religion of China, trans. and ed. Hans H. Gerth. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
68. West, James. 1997. Martial Lawlessness: The Legal Aftermath of Kwangju. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6:85-168.
69. West, James, and Dae-Kyu Yoon. 1992. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex. American Journal of Comparative Law 40:73-119.
70. Winn, Jane Kaufmann, and Tang-chi Yeh. 1995. Advocating Democracy: The Role of Lawyers in Taiwan's Political Transformation. Law and Social Inquiry 20:561-99.
71. Yang, Kun. 1993. Judicial Review and Social Change in the Korean Democratizing Process. American Journal of Comparative Law 41:1-8.
72. Yong-chin, Su. 1997. Summary of Interpretations by Council of Grand Justices. In Zhonghua minguo xing hsien wu shi nien (Fifty years of the ROC constitution). Taipei: National Assembly.