Comparative law and the courts

International and Comparative Law Quarterly

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 545-556

  Koopmans, T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015571653     PISSN: 00205893     EISSN: 14716895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020589300059352     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. See also Peter de Cruz. A Modern Approach to Comparative Law (1993), chap.1.
2. See A. S. Hartkamp. “Statutory Law Making: The New Civil Code of the Netherlands”, in Towards Universal Law, Trends in National, European and International Law Making, Yearbook of the Faculty of Law. Uppsala. 5 (1995). p.151.
3. See Pierre Pescatore. “Le recours. par la Cour de Justice des Communautés euro-péennes, à des normes déduites de la comparaison des droits des Etats Membres” (1980) R.I.D.C. 337.
4. See the famous Case 26/62. Van Gend en Loos [1963] E.C.R. 12.
5. Case 178-84, Commission v. Federal Republic of Germany [1987] E.C.R. 1227 (“purity” of beer).
6. Case C-470/93, Verein gegen Unwesen in Handel und Gewerbe. Weekly Bulletin of the Court of Justice 20-95.
7. Case 155/79. A. M. & S. [1982] E.C.R. 1575.
8. Commission Decision 79/760 of 6 July 1979 (1979) O.J. L199.
9. See Helmut Coing. “European Common Law: Historical Foundations”, in Mauro Cappelletti (Ed.). New Perspectives for a Common Law of Europe (1978). p.31.
10. See my “Judicial Activism and Procedural Law” (1993) I Eur. Rev. Private L. 69.
11. Van Kreuningen v. Bessem Hoge Raad. 21 May 1943. Nederlandse Jurisprudence (NJ.) 1943.455.
12. See C. J. J. M. Stolker. “Wrongful Life: The Limits of Liability and Beyond” (1994) 43 I.C.L.Q. 521.
13. DES-Daughters Hoge Raad, 9 Oct. 1992. N.J. 1994.535.
14. Art.6:99. Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
15. See E. Hondius. “A Dutch Case: Pharmaceutical Companies Jointly and Severally Liable” [1994] Consum. L.J. 40.
16. See also case notes and comments in (1994) 2 Eur. Rev. Private L. 409–469.
17. See also Art.2. s.2. EEC Directive 76/207 on equal treatment of men and women in employment (1976) O.J. L39.
18. See L. Lusky and M. Botein. “The Law of Equality in the United States”, in T. Koopmans (Ed.). Constitutional Protection of Equality (1975). chap.2.
19. European Court of Human Rights. 21 Feb. 1986. James. Ser.A-98. and 8 July 1987. Lithgow. Ser.A-102.
20. Mathilda and Others v. Rooms-Katholiek Centraal Schoolbestuur and Another Hoge Raad. 7 May 1993, N.J. 1995. 259.
21. While and Another v. Jones and Others [1995] 1 All E.R. 691.
22. In particular to B. S. Markesinis. The German Law of Torts: A Comparative Introduction (3rd edn. 1994).
23. I refer to R. J. Pothier, Traité des obligations (new edn, 1873). Pothier lived from 1699 to 1772.
24. See Roscoe Pound. The Spirit of the Common Law (1921). chap.VIII.
25. See also A. W. Heringa. “The Separation of Powers Argument”, in R. Bakker et al. (Eds). Judicial Control: Comparative Essays on Judicial Review (1995).