Deliberative democracy and the institutions of judicial review

Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-366

  Zurn, Christopher F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922899281     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511498749     Document Type: Book

References (265)

1. Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
2. Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
3. Ackerman, Bruce, and James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.
4. Alexander, Larry. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Larry Alexander, 1-13. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
5. Alexander, Larry. “Is Judicial Review Democratic? A Comment on Harel.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 277–83.
6. Alexander, Larry. “The Constitution as Law.” Constitutional Commentary 6 (1989): 103ff.
7. Alexander, Larry, and Frederick Schauer. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1997): 1359-87.
8. Alexander, Larry, and Lawrence B. Solum. “Popular? Constitutionalism? A Book Review of the People Themselves by Larry D. Kramer.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 5 (2005): 1594-640.
9. Alexy, Robert. “The Special Case Thesis.” Ratio Juris 12, no. 4 (1999): 374-84.
10. Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
11. Ankersmit, F. R. Aesthetic Polities: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.
12. Apel, Karl-Otto. “The a Priori of the Communication Community and the Foundations of Ethics.” In Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, 225-300. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
13. Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 60 vols. Vol. 43. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1964.
14. Arato, Andrew. Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
15. Aristotle. Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. New York: Random House, 1943.
16. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Translated by Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols, Bollingen Series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.
17. Arrow, Kenneth J. Social Choice and Individual Values. Second ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.
18. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
19. Barber, Benjamin J. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age,. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
20. Barber, Sotirios A., and Robert P. George, eds. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change,. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
21. Barnett, Randy E. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
22. Baum, Lawrence. The Supreme Court. Eighth ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004.
23. Baynes, Kenneth. “Rights as Critique and the Critique of Rights: Karl Marx, Wendy Brown, and the Social Function of Rights.” Political Theory 28, no. 4 (2000): 451-68.
24. Bellamy, Richard. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Government.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 436-56.
25. Bellamy, Richard, and Dario Castiglione. “Introduction: Constitutions and Politics.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 413-16.
26. Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Seyla Benhabib, 67-94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
27. Bennett, Robert W. “Counter-Conversationalism and the Sense of Difficulty.” Northwestern University Law Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 845-906.
28. Bennett, Robert W. Talking It Through: Puzzles of American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.
29. Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
30. Bogdanor, Vernon. “Constitutional Reform in Britain: The Quiet Revolution.” Annual Review of Political Science 8, no. 1 (2005): 73-98.
31. Bohman, James. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
32. Bohman, James. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 400-25.
33. Bork, Robert H. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971).
34. Brewer-Carlas, Allan R. Judicial Review in Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
35. Brigham, John. “The Constitution of the Supreme Court.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, 15-27. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.
36. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
37. Brutus. “Letters Of”Brutus”.” In The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus,” edited by Terence Ball, 433-533. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
38. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).
39. Cappelletti, Mauro. Judicial Review in the Contemporary World. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971.
40. Castiglione, Dario. “The Political Theory of the Constitution.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 417-35.
41. Chambers, Simone. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 307-26.
42. Chambers, Simone. “Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy.” Constellations 11, no. 2 (2004): 153-73.
43. Cheeves, John. “Committee OKs Ban on Nude Club Dancing.” Lexington Herald- Leader, February 11, 2000, B 1.
44. Chemerinsky, Erwin. “The Supreme Court, 1988 Term - Foreword: The Vanishing Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1989): 43-104.
45. Choper, Jesse H. Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
46. Christiano, Thomas. “Waldron on Law and Disagreement.” Law and Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2000): 513-43.
47. City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).
48. Clayton, Cornell, and Howard Gillman, eds. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
49. Clinton, Robert Lowry. “How the Court Became Supreme.” First Things 89 (1998): 13-19.
50. Cohen, Joshua. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97 (1986): 26-38.
51. Cohen, Joshua. 1998. Dahl on Democracy and Equal Consideration. In, http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/cohen/dahl_on_democracy.pdf (accessed March 31, 2005).
52. Cohen, Joshua. “Democracy and Liberty.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Jon Elster, 185-231. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
53. Cohen, Joshua. “For a Democratic Society.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Samuel Freeman, 86-138. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
54. Cohen, Joshua. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries ofthe Political, edited by Seyla Benhabib, 95-119. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
55. Cohen, Joshua, and Joel Rogers. Associations and Democracy. London: Verso, 1995.
56. Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).
57. Constant, Benjamin. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns.” In The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant, edited by Biancamaria Fontana, 307-28. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
58. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958).
59. Corwin, Edward S. The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Binghamton, NY: Cornell University Press, 1955 (1928).
60. Dahl, Robert A. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
61. Dahl, Robert A. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National PolicyMaker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279-95.
62. Dahl, Robert A. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National PolicyMaker.” In The Democracy Sourcebook, edited by Robert A. Dahl, Ian Shapiro, and José Antonio Cheibub, 246-51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003 (1957).
63. Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.
64. Dahl, Robert A. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.
65. Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
66. Dahl, Robert A, Ian Shapiro, and Jose Antonio Cheibub, eds. The Democracy Sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
67. Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986).
68. Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay Lomax Cook, and Lawrence R. Jacobs. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7, no. 1 (2004): 315-44.
69. Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Vol. 2: 1925-1927, The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925-1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.
70. Dicey, A. V. An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965 (1908).
71. Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: The Free Press, 1957.
72. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).
73. Dryzek, John S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
74. Dryzek, John S. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
75. Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
76. Dworkin, Ronald. “Constitutionalism and Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (1995): 2-11.
77. Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
78. Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
79. Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue,: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
80. Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
81. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1967).
82. Dworkin, Ronald, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomson. “Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers’ Brief.” New York Review of Books, March 27 1997, 41-47.
83. Eisgruber, Christopher L. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
84. Eisgruber, Christopher L. “Disagreeable People.” Stanford Law Review 43 (1990): 275ff.
85. Elk Grove Unified School District et al. v. Newdow et al., 542 U.S. 1 (2004).
86. Elster, Jon. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, 3-33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
87. Ely, John Hart. “Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures.” Virginia Law Review 77 (1991): 833-79.
88. Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
89. Ely, John Hart. On Constitutional Ground. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
90. Epstein, Lee. “Judicial Decision Making.” In Encyclopedia of Law & Society, edited by David C. Clark. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.
91. Epstein, Lee. “The Comparative Advantage.” Law and Courts 9 (1999): 1-6.
92. Eskridge, William N., Jr., and John Ferejohn. “Politics, Interpretation, and the Rule of Law.” In The Rule of Law: Nomos XXXVI, edited by Ian Shapiro, 265-2894. New York: New York University Press, 1994.
93. Estlund, David M. “Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, 173-204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
94. Fabre, Cécile. “A Philosophical Argument for a Bill of Rights.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (2000): 77-98.
95. Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Legitimacy and the Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 6 (2005): 1787-1853.
96. Favoreu, Louis. “Constitutional Review in Europe.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, edited by Louis Henkin and Albert J. Rosenthal, 38-62. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
97. Ferejohn, John. “Constitutional Review in the Global Context.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 6 (2002-2003): 49-59.
98. Ferejohn, John. “Instituting Deliberative Democracy.” In Designing Democratic Institutions, edited by Ian Shapiro and Stephen Macedo, 75-104. New York: New York University Press, 2000.
99. Ferejohn, John. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Hoover Digest (2003).
100. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe.” Texas Law Review 82 (2004): 1671-1704.
101. Ferejohn, John, Jack N. Rakove, and Jonathan Riley. “Editors’ Introduction.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, edited by John Ferejohn, Jack N. Rakove and Jonathan Riley, 1-37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
102. Finn, John E. “The Civic Constitution: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, edited by Sotirios A. Barber and Robert P. George, 41-69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
103. Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.
104. Fishkin, James S. 2004. Deliberative Polling®: Toward a Better-Informed Democracy. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/docs/summary/ (accessed June 15 2005).
105. Fishkin, James S. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.
106. Fishkin, James S. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. expanded ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.
107. Fishkin, James S., and Robert C. Luskin. 2004. Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html (accessed June 15, 2005).
108. Forst, Rainer. “The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy.” Ratio Juris 14, no. 4 (2001): 345-78.
109. Freeman, Samuel. “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 9 (1990-1991): 327-70.
110. Freeman, Samuel. “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Critique.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, no. 4 (2000): 371-418.
111. Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. Revised ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.
112. Fung, Archon. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 11, no. 3 (2003): 338-67.
113. Gardbaum, Stephen. “The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 707-60.
114. Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
115. Goodin, Robert E. “Democratic Deliberation within.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett, 54-79. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
116. Gordon, Scott. Controlling the State,: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
117. Graber, Mark A. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993): 35-73.
118. Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963).
119. Grey, Thomas C. “Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework.” In Constitutionalism, edited by J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 189-209. New York: New York University Press, 1979.
120. Griffin, Stephen M. American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
121. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
122. Gunther, Klaus. The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law. Translated by John Farell. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.
123. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
124. Habermas, Jürgen. “A Short Reply.” Ratio Juris 12, no. 4 (1999): 445-53.
125. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
126. Habermas, Jürgen. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29, no. 6 (2001): 766-81.
127. Habermas, Jürgen. “On Law and Disagreement: Some Comments On ‘Interpretive Pluralism’.” Ratio Juris 16, no. 2 (2003): 187-94.
128. Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
129. Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
130. Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus,” Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
131. Hand, Learned. “Democracy: Its Presumptions and Realities.” In The Spirit of Liberty: Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand, edited by Irving Dilliard, 90-102. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960 [1932].
132. Hand, Learned. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.
133. Harel, Alon. “Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3-4 (2003): 247-76.
134. Hart, H. L.A. The Concept of Law. Second ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
135. Hayek, Friedrich A. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
136. Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
137. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Richard Tuck, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
138. Holmes, Stephen. “Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad, 19-58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
139. Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
140. Holmes, Stephen. “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad, 195-240. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
141. Holmes, Stephen, and Cass R. Sunstein. “The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Sanford Levinson, 275-306. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
142. Hume, David. “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.” In Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Human Morals, edited by P. H. Nidditch. New York: Clarendon Press, 1975.
143. Jacob, Herbert. “Introduction.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Herbert Jacob, Erhard Blankenberg, Herbert M. Kritzer, Doris Marie Provine and Joseph Sanders, 1-15. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
144. Jacob, Herbert, Erhard Blankenberg, Herbert M. Kritzer, Doris Marie Provine, and Joseph Sanders. Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
145. Kalyvas, Andreas. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12, no. 5 (2005): 223-44.
146. Kant, Immanuel. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss, 41-53. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
147. Kavanagh, Aileen. “Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 5 (2003): 451-86.
148. Kelsen, Hans. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. New York: Clarendon Press, 1992.
149. Kelsen, Hans. “Judicial Review of Legislation. A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution.” Journal of Politics 4, no. 2 (1942): 183-200.
150. Klarman, Michael J. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
151. Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
152. Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
153. Kritzer, Herbert M. “Courts, Justice, and Politics in England.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Herbert Jacob, Erhard Blankenburg, Herbert M. Kritzer, Doris Marie Provine and Joseph Sanders, 81-176. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
154. Lawrence et al. v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003).
155. Leib, Ethan J. “Towards a Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Proposal for a Popular Branch.” Rutgers Law Journal 33 (2002): 359-456.
156. Levinson, Sanford, ed. Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
157. Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty- Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.
158. Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
159. Locke, John. “The Second Treatise of Government.” In Two Treatises of Government, edited by Peter Laslett, 265-428. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
160. Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Peter Laslett. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
161. Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003).
162. Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Dennis L. Plane. 1999. Deliberative Polling and Policy Outcomes: Electric Utility Issues in Texas. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html. (accessed June 16, 2005).
163. Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849).
164. Lutz, Donald S. “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Sanford Levinson, 237-74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
165. MacCormick, Neil. “The Relative Heteronomy of Law.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (1995): 69-85.
166. Maddex, Robert E. Constitutions of the World. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 2001.
167. Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15, no. 3 (1987): 338-68.
168. Mansbridge, Jane. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
169. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
170. Marmor, Andrei. “The Rule of Law and Its Limits.” Law and Philosophy 23, no. 1 (2004): 1-43.
171. Marshall, T. H. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
172. Mavcic, Arne. 2004. A Tabular Presentation of Constitutional/Judicial Review around the World. In http://www.concourts.net/index.html (accessed December 21, 2004).
173. McCann, Michael. “How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, 63-97. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.
174. McCarthy, Thomas. “Enlightenment and the Public Use of Reason.” European Journal ofPhilosophy 3, no. 3 (1995): 242-56.
175. McCarthy, Thomas. “Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytic Distinctions.” Cardozo Law Review 17, no. 4-5 (1996): 1083-125.
176. McCarthy, Thomas. “Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics.” In Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory, 181-99. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991.
177. McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).
178. McGuire, Kevin T. “The Supreme Court Bar and Institutional Relationships.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, 115-32. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.
179. Michelman, Frank I. Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
180. Michelman, Frank I. “Constitutional Authorship.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Larry Alexander, 64-98. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
181. Michelman, Frank I. “Family Quarrel.” Cardozo Law Review 17, no. 4-5 (1996): 1163-77.
182. Michelman, Frank I. “Morality, Identity and ‘Constitutional Patriotism.”’ Denver University Law Review 76, no. 4 (1999): 1009-28.
183. Michelman, Frank I. “The Problem of Constitutional Interpretive Disagreement: Can ‘Discourses of Application’ Help?” In Habermas and Pragmatism, edited by Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Bookman and Catherine Kemp, 113-38. New York: Routledge, 2002.
184. Michelman, Frank I. “The Supreme Court, 1985 Term - Forward: Traces of Self-Government.” Harvard Law Review 100, no. 4 (1986): 4-77.
185. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
186. Moon, J. Donald. “Rawls and Habermas on Public Reason: Human Rights and Global Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 257-74.
187. Murphy, Coleen. “Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law.” Law and Philosophy 24, no. 3 (2005): 239-62.
188. Nagel, Robert F. “Interpretation and Importance in Constitutional Law: A ReAssessment of Judicial Restraint.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 181-207. NewYork: New York University Press, 1983.
189. Nino, Carlos Santiago. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
190. Noonan, John T., Jr Narrowing the Nation’s Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
191. O’Connor, Sandra Day, and Pete Williams. “The Majesty of the Law: An Interview with Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.” In University of Louisville Kentucky Author Forum. Louisville, KY: WFPL, 2003.
192. Paulsen, Michael Stokes. “The Irrepressible Myth of Marbury.” Michigan Law Review 101 (2003): 601-37.
193. Peretti, Terri Jennings. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
194. Perry, Michael J. The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
195. Perry, Michael J. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.
196. Perry, Michael J. The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
197. Perry, Michael J. “What Is ‘the Constitution’? (and Other Fundamental Questions).” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Larry Alexander, 99-151. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
198. Peterson, Victor. “A Discourse Theory of Moral Judgment.” Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, 1998.
199. Pickerill, J. Mitchell. Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.
200. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
201. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1895).
202. Posner, Richard A. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
203. Preu B, Ulrich K. “Constitutionalism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward Craig, 618-22. New York: Routledge, 1998.
204. Provine, Doris Marie. “Courts in the Political Process in France.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Herbert Jacob, Erhard Blankenburg, Herbert M. Kritzer, Doris Marie Provine and Joseph Sanders, 177-248. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
205. Przeworski, Adam. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy’s Value, edited by Ian Shapiro and Hacker-Cordon Casiano, 23-55. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
206. Radin, Jane. “Reconsidering the Rule of Law.” Boston University Law Review 69 (1989): 785ff.
207. Railton, Peter. “Judicial Review, Elites, and Liberal Democracy.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 153-80. New York: New York University Press, 1983.
208. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
209. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Paperback ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
210. Rawls, John. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In Collected Papers, edited by Samuel Freeman, 573-615. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
211. Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Larry Alexander, 152-93. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
212. Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
213. Rehg, William. Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jurgen Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
214. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).
215. Riker, William H. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice,. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1982.
216. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
217. Romer, Governor of Colorado, et al. v. Evans et al., 517 U.S. 620 (1996).
218. Rosenbaum, Alan S. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension, edited by Alan S. Rosenbaum, 1-6. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.
219. Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
220. Rosenfeld, Michel. “The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy.” Southern California Law Review 74, no. 5 (2001): 1307-51.
221. Rostow, Eugene V. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66 (1952): 193-224.
222. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract. Translated by Christopher Betts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
223. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Of the Social Contract.” In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited by Victor Gourevitch. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
224. Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.
225. Ryfe, David M. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 8, no. 1 (2005): 49-71.
226. Sager, Lawrence G. Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of Constitutional Practice, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.
227. Saward, Michael. The Terms of Democracy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1998.
228. Scalia, Antonin. “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and the Laws.” In A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, edited by Amy Gutmann, 3-47. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
229. Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943.
230. Shapiro, Martin. “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, 149-83. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
231. Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet. “Abstract Review and Judicial LawMaking.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, 343-75. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
232. Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
233. Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983).
234. Spaeth, Harold J. 1998. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953-1997 Terms. In, Michigan State University, Dept. of Political Science, http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR-STUDY/09422.xml. (accessed January 10, 2005).
235. Spector, Horacio. “Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3-4 (2003): 285-334.
236. Stone, Alec. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
237. Strauss, David A. “Constitutions, Written and Otherwise.” Law and Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2000): 451-64.
238. Sunstein, Cass R. Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
239. Sunstein, Cass R. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
240. Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
241. Sunstein, Cass R. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
242. Sweet, Alec Stone. “Constitutional Politics in France and Germany.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, 184-208. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
243. Sweet, Alec Stone. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe,. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
244. Sweet, Alec Stone. “Path Dependence, Precedent, and Judicial Power.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, 113-35. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
245. Tate, Neal, and Thorsten Vallinder, eds. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press, 1995.
246. Thomas, George. “Recovering the Political Constitution: The Madisonian Vision.” The Review ofPolitics 66, no. 2 (2004): 233-56.
247. Tribe, Lawrence H. “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories.” Yale Law Journal 89, no. 6 (1980): 1063-80.
248. Tullis, Jeffrey K. “Deliberation between Institutions.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett, 200-11. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
249. Tushnet, Mark. “Forms of Judicial Review as Expressions of Constitutional Patriotism.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3-4 (2003): 353-79.
250. Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
251. United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).
252. Vacco v. Quill, 521 US 793 (1997).
253. Vieth et al. v. Jubelirer, 541 US 267 (2004).
254. Waldron, Jeremy. “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1993): 18-51.
255. Waldron, Jeremy. “Freeman’s Defense of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 13 (1994): 27-41.
256. Waldron, Jeremy. “Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 137-64.
257. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and the Conditions of Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 335-55.
258. Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
259. Waldron, Jeremy. “Rights and Majorities: Rousseau Revisited.” In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981-1991, 392-421. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
260. Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
261. Walker, Neil. “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism.” The Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 317-59.
262. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).
263. Whittington, Keith E. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
264. Wolin, Sheldon S. “The Liberal/Democratic Divide: On Rawls's Political Liberalism.” Political Theory 24, no. 1 (1996): 97-119.
265. Zurn, Christopher F. “Deliberative Democracy and Constitutional Review.” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 467-542.