Restoring the lost constitution: The presumption of liberty

Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Barnett, Randy E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883993537     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (180)

1. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 176 (1803).
2. Randy E. Barnett, The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)
3. Edmund S. Morgan, Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America (New York: Norton, 1988), 13-14.
4. James Madison, Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 (New York: Norton, 1987), 231.
5. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961), 77-96 .
6. Christopher W. Morris, "The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: 'We the People' Reconsidered," Social Philosophy and Policy 17, 1 (Winter 2000): 1-26.
7. Michael W. McConnell, "The Importance of Humility in Judicial Review: A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's 'Moral Reading' of the Constitution," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1291.
8. "Washington's Farewell Address," in Henry Steele Commager, Documents of American History, 6th ed. (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1958), 172. This passage of Washington's speech was reputedly drafted by Alexander Hamilton.
9. Joseph Ellis, Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001), 152.
10. Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 1991), 184.
11. Lea Brilmayer, "Consent, Contract, and Territory," Minnesota Law Review 74 (1989):
12. McConnell, "Importance of Humility," 1291.
13. Jeffrey Reiman, "The Constitution, Rights, and the Conditions of Legitimacy," in Alan S. Rosenbaum, ed., Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), 134.
14. Randy E. Barnett, Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), 17-23.
15. Frederick Schauer, "Precedent and the Necessary Externality of Constitutional Norms," Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17 (1994): 52.
16. Jean Braucher, "Contract versus Contractualism: The Regulatory Role of Contract Law,"Washington and Lee Law Review 47 (1990): 697-739;
17. Peter Linzer, "Is Consent the Essence of Contract?- Replying to Four Critics," Annual Survey of American Law (1988): 213.
18. Sydney Hook, ed., Law and Philosophy (New York: New York University Press, 1964), 10
19. Williamson A. Edmunson, ed., The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).
20. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974), 90-95.
21. A. John Simmons, "The Principle of Fair Play," in Edmundson, Duty to Obey, 124- 25.
22. Barnett, Structure of Liberty, 77-82.
23. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), 12.
24. Lysander Spooner, "The Unconstitutionality of Slavery," rev. ed. (1860), reprinted in Charles Shively, ed., The Collected Works of Lysander Spooner, vol. 4 (Providence: M & S Press, 1971), 153.
25. Thomas Jefferson (October 17, 1788), in Madison, Letters and Other Writings of James Madison, vol. 1 (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1867), 425.
26. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, The Federalist, ed. Clinton Rossiter (New York: Penguin Books, 1961), 78.
27. Jonathan Elliot, Debates on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, vol. 3 (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1859), 87 (Friday, June 6, 1788).
28. Isaac Penington, Jr., The Fundamental Right, Safety and Liberty of the People (London: Giles Calvert, 1657), 13. This is a reprint of the essay that originally appeared in 1651.
29. Jack N. Rakove, Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (New York: Vintage 1997), 233.
30. Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), 135.
31. Frank H. Knight, Freedom and Reform (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982), 416.
32. Randy E. Barnett, "The Sound of Silence: Default Rules and Contractual Consent," University of Virginia Law Review 78 (1992): 821, 902-5.
33. Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law, rev. ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), 124-25.
34. Terrence McConnell, Inalienable Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 3-44.
35. Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), 233.
36. Robin West, "Natural Law Ambiguities," Connecticut Law Review 25 (1992): 831.
37. Aquinas, Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Great Books of the Western World, vol. 20 (Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952), 233.
38. Elliot, Debates, 167 (James Iredell, North Carolina ratifying convention, Tuesday, July 29, 1788).
39. Joseph Gales and William Seaton, eds., The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States, vol. 1 (Washington, D.C.: Gales and Seaton, 1834)
40. Randy E. Barnett, ed., The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment (Fairfax, Va.: George Mason University Press, 1989), 64.
41. James Wilson, "Of the Natural Rights of Individuals," in The Works of James Wilson, vol. 2, ed. J. D. Andrews (Chicago: Callaghan and Company, 1896), 307.
42. Merrill Jensen, ed., The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, vol. 2 (Stevens Point, Wis.: Worzalla Publishing, 1976), 388
43. Philip A. Hamburger, "Trivial Rights," Notre Dame Law Review 70 (1994): 1.
44. Michael Kent Curtis, No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1986), 71-91.
45. Chester Antieau, "Paul's Perverted Privileges or the True Meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article Four,"William and Mary Law Review 9 (1967): 5
46. David S. Bogen, "The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV," Case Western Reserve Law Review 37 (1987): 796
47. Michael Conant, "Antimonopoly Tradition under the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments: Slaughter-House Cases Re-Examined," Emory Law Journal 31 (1982): 785.
48. Steven J. Heyman, "The First Duty of Government: Protection, Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment," Duke Law Journal 41 (1991): 507.
49. Harold Gill Reuschlein and William A. Gregory, The Law of Agency and Partnership, 2d ed. (St.Paul, Minn.: West, 1990), 102
50. Randy E. Barnett, "Squaring Undisclosed Agency Law with Contract Theory," California Law Review 75 (1987): 1969.
51. Bruce Ackerman,We the People: Transformations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 1998), 110-11.
52. Elizur Goodrich, "The Principles of Civil Union and Happiness Considered and Recommended" (delivered May 10, 1787), in Ellis Sandoz, ed.,Political Sermons of the American Founding: 1730-1805 (Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Press, 1991), 914-15
53. Michael McConnell, "A Moral Realist Defense of Constitutional Democracy," Chicago-Kent Law Review 64 (1988): 89
54. Henry B. Veatch, For an Ontology of Morals: A Critique of Contemporary Ethical Theory (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1971).
55. Randy E. Barnett, "A Law Professor's Guide to Natural Law and Natural Rights," Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20 (1997): 655.
56. Edwin Meese III, "Before the American Bar Association" (July 9, 1985), in The Great Debate: Interpreting Our Written Constitution (Washington, D.C.: The Federalist Society, 1986), 9;
57. Meese, "A Return to Constitutional Interpretation from Judicial Law-Making," New York Law School Law Review 40 (1996): 925-33.
58. Robert H. Bork, "Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems," Indiana Law Review 47 (1971): 1.
59. Paul Brest, "The Misconceived Quest for Original Understanding," Boston University Law Review (1980): 204.
60. H. Jefferson Powell, "The Original Understanding of Original Intent," Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 885.
61. Jack N. Rakove, ed., Interpreting the Constitution: The Debate over Original Intent (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990).
62. Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry, Desperately Seeking Certainty: The Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), 10-28.
63. Brest, "Misconceived Quest for Original Understanding," 221.
64. Powell, "Original Understanding of Original Intent," 885.
65. Jack N. Rakove, "Fidelity through History (or to It)," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1592 n. 14.
66. James E. Fleming, "Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1344.
67. Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law (New York: Free Press, 1990), 144.
68. Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), 17.
69. Edmund Randolph, "Attorney General's Opinion" (February 12, 1791), in M. St. Clair Clarke and D. A. Hall, eds., Legislative and Documentary History of the Bank of the United States (1832; reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1967), 90.
70. Akhil Reed Amar, "Intratextualism," Harvard Law Review 112 (1999): 747.
71. Ronald Dworkin, "Comment," in Scalia, Matter of Interpretation, 116.
72. Ronald Dworkin, "The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, and Nerve," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1258 n. 18
73. Powell, "Original Understanding of Original Intent," 938 (quoting letter from James Madison to C. E. Haynes, February 25, 1831).
74. Robert N. Clinton, "Original Understanding, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of 'This Constitution,' " Iowa Law Review 72 (1987): 1177; Charles A. Lofgren, "The Original Understanding of Original Intent?" Constitutional Commentary 5 (1989): 77.
75. Charles A. Lofgren, "The Original Understanding of Original Intent?" Constitutional Commentary 5 (1989): 77.
76. Randy E. Barnett, "Was Slavery Unconstitutional before the Thirteenth Amendment? Lysander Spooner's Theory of Interpretation," Pacific Law Journal 28 (1997): 977.
77. Clinton, "Original Understanding," 1186-1220;
78. Joseph M. Lynch, Negotiating the Constitution: The Earliest Debates over Original Intent (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999)
79. Steven G. Calabresi, "The Tradition of the Written Constitution: A Comment on Professor Lessig's Theory of Translation," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1445-47.
80. Lon L. Fuller, "Consideration and Form," Columbia Law Review 41 (1941): 799.
81. John Calamari and Joseph Perillo, Contracts, 3d ed. (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1987)
82. William Blackstone, Blackstone's Commentaries: With Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal Government of the United States and of the Commonwealth of Virginia, by William Blackstone, vol. 1 (Philadelphia: William Young Birch and Abraham Small, 1803), 154-55.
83. Thomas C. Grey, "The Uses of an Unwritten Constitution," Chicago-Kent Law Review 645 (1988): 223-29.
84. William Rawle, A View of the Constitution, 2d ed. (Philadelphia: Philip H. Nicklin, 1829), 15-16.
85. E. Alan Farnsworth, " 'Meaning' in the Law of Contracts," Yale Law Journal 76 (1967): 951-65.
86. Melvin Aron Eisenberg, "The Responsive Model of Contract Law," Stanford Law Review 36 (1984): 1107
87. Thomas B. McAffee, "Prolegomena to a Meaningful Debate of the 'Unwritten Constitution' Thesis," University of Cincinnati Law Review 61 (1992): 107
88. Bret Boyce, "Originalism and the Fourteenth Amendment,"Wake Forest Law Review 33 (1998): 909
89. Bruce Ackerman, "A Generation of Betrayal," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1519
90. Samuel Rosenman, ed., "The Public Papers of and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt" (1937), 132.
91. Jack Balkin, "Agreements with Hell, and Other Objects of Our Faith," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1703
92. Robert Cover, Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975).
93. Richard S. Kay, "Adherence to the Original Intentions in Constitutional Adjudication: Three Objections and Responses," Northwestern University Law Review 82 (1988): 244.
94. Keith E. Whittington, Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999)
95. Randy E. Barnett and Don B. Kates, "Under Fire: The New Consensus on the Second Amendment," Emory Law Journal 45 (1996): 1210
96. Randy E. Barnett, "James Madison's Ninth Amendment," in The Rights Retained by the People, vol. 1;
97. Randy E. Barnett, "Implementing the Ninth Amendment," in The Rights Retained by the People, vol. 2.
98. Michael Kent Curtis, No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1986).
99. Dorothy E. Roberts, "The Meaning of Blacks' Fidelity to the Constitution," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1761
100. Friedrich Waismann, "How I See Philosophy," in A. J. Ayre, ed., Logical Positivism (New York: Free Press, 1959), 345.
101. Farnsworth, " 'Meaning' in the Law of Contracts," 953-56
102. But compare Ronald Dworkin, "Reflections on Fidelity," Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1808
103. Lawrence B. Solum, "On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma," University of Chicago Law Review 54 (1987): 473.
104. Keith E. Whittington, Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), 1-19.
105. Frederick Schauer, "Easy Cases," Southern California Law Review 58 (1985): 430
106. Merrill D. Peterson, ed., Thomas Jefferson: Writings (New York: Library of America, 1984), 1140.
107. Joel B. Grossman, "Political Questions," in Kermit Hall, ed., The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 651.
108. Charles S. Hyneman, The Supreme Court on Trial (New York: Atherton Press, 1963), 125.
109. Francis Hopkinson (March 13, 1789), in Julian P. Boyd et al., eds., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 14 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950), 651.
110. Thomas Jefferson (October 17, 1788), in Papers of James Madison, vol. 11 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), 297
111. James Madison, "Observations on the 'Draught of a Constitution for Virginia,' " (ca.October 15, 1788), in Madison Papers, 11:293.
112. Spencer Roane (September 6, 1819), in Paul Leicester Ford, ed., TheWritings of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 10 (New York: Putnam's, 1892-99), 140.
113. David N. Mayer, The Constitutional Thought of Thomas Jefferson (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994), 257-94.
114. Linda Grant De Pauw et al., Documentary History of the First Federal Congress, vol. 14 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), 379.
115. Edward Livingston (April 30, 1800), reprinted in P. Ford, ed., The Works of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 9 (New York: Knickerbocker Press, 1905), 132-33.
116. Edmund Randolph, "Opinion of Edmund Randolph," in History of the Bank, 89.
117. Thomas Jefferson, "Opinion of Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, on the Same Subject," in History of the Bank, 93 (February 15, 1791)
118. Gary Lawson and Patricia B. Granger, "The 'Proper' Scope of Federal Power: A Jurisdictional Interpretation of the Sweeping Clause," Duke Law Journal 43 (1993): 288.
119. David P. Currie, "The Constitution in the Supreme Court: State and Congressional Powers, 1801-1835," University of Chicago Law Review 49 (1982): 931.
120. John Marshall, "A Friend of the Constitution," Alexandria Gazette, July 15, 1819, reprinted in Gerald Gunther, ed., John Marshall's Defense of McCulloch v. Maryland (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969), 186-87
121. Marshall, "A Friend of the Constitution," reprinted in John Marshall's Defense, 211.
122. Randy E. Barnett, "Contract Remedies and Inalienable Rights," Social Policy and Philosophy 4 (1986): 179 (defining inalienable rights and providing four reasons why some rights are inalienable);
123. Kevin Newsom, "Setting Incorporationism Straight: A Reinterpretation of the Slaughter-House Cases," Yale Law Journal 109 (2000): 643.
124. Michael Kent Curtis, "The 1837 Killing of Elijah Lovejoy by an Anti-Abolition Mob: Free Speech, Mobs, Republican Government, and the Privileges of American Citizens," UCLA Law Review 44 (1997): 1109.
125. Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the Civil War (Chicago: Open Court, 1996), 313-59.
126. Todd Zywicki, "Beyond the Shell and Husk of History: The History of the Seventeenth Amendment and Its Implications for Current Reform Proposals," Cleveland State Law Review 45 (1997): 165
127. James W. Ely, Jr., "The Oxymoron Reconsidered: Myth and Reality in the Origins of Substantive Due Process," Constitutional Commentary 16 (1997): 319
128. John W. Johnson, "Brandeis Brief," in Hall et al., The Oxford Companion, 85.
129. Walton H. Hamilton and Douglas Adair, The Power to Govern: The Constitution- Then and Now (New York: Norton, 1937).
130. Howard Gillman, The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993)
131. James B. Thayer, "The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law," Harvard Law Review 7 (1893): 129.
132. Walton H. Hamilton, "The Jurist's Art," Columbia Law Review 31 (1931): 1074-75
133. Barry Cushman, Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).
134. Geoffrey P. Miller, "The True Story of Carolene Products," Supreme Court Review (1987): 397.
135. Dean Alfange, Jr., "Footnote Four," in Hall et al., The Oxford Companion, 306-7.
136. Randy E. Barnett, "Justice Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution," Cato Supreme Court Review 2002-2003 (2003).
137. Bennett B. Patterson, The Forgotten Ninth Amendment: A Call for Legislative and Judicial Recognition of Rights under Social Conditions of Today (Indianapolis: Bobbs- Merrill, 1955).
138. Randy E. Barnett, The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, vol. 2 (Fairfax, Va.: George Mason University Press, 1993).
139. Randy E. Barnett, The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, vol. 2 (Fairfax,Va.: George Mason University Press, 1993).
140. Randy E. Barnett, "The Ninth Amendment," in Leonard W. Levy, Kenneth L. Karst, and Adam Winkler, eds., The Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, Supplement 2 (New York: Macmillian, 2000), 1813-15.
141. Tucker, "Of the Constitution of the United States," in appendix to Blackstone's Commentaries (1), 307-8.
142. Russell L. Caplan, "The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment," Virginia Law Review 69 (1983): 259.
143. Bork, The Tempting of America, 184-85.
144. John Choon Yoo, "Our Declaratory Ninth Amendment," Emory Law Journal 42 (1993): 1008-9.
145. John H. Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge.: Harvard University Press, 1980), 204 n. 87.
146. Thomas McAffee, "The Bill of Rights, Social Contract Theory, and the Rights 'Retained' by the People," Southern Illinois University Law Journal 16 (1992): 300.
147. McAffee, "Original Meaning of the Ninth Amendment," 1300 n. 326
148. Tucker, "Of the Constitution of the United States," in appendix to Blackstone's Commentaries (1), 307-8 (emphasis added).
149. Bernard Schwartz, The Bill of Rights: A Documentary History, vol. 2 (New York: Chelsea House, 1971), 1188
150. Raoul Berger, "The Ninth Amendment: The Beckoning Mirage," Rutgers Law Review 42 (1990): 966
151. McAffee, "Bill of Rights, Social Contract," 241.
152. Donald S. Lutz, "The States and the U.S. Bill of Rights," Southern University Law Review 16 (1992): 251-62.
153. Jeff Rosen, "Was the Flag Burning Amendment Unconstitutional?" Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 1078. The citations presented in the next six footnotes are taken from this article.
154. Lysander Spooner, "The Unconstitutionality of Laws of Congress, Prohibiting Private Mails" (New York: Tribune Printing Establishment, 1844), reprinted in vol. 1 of Spooner, The Collected Works.
155. Jeff Rosen, "Was the Flag Burning Amendment Unconstitutional?" Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 1078.
156. Barry Friedman, "Dialogue and Judicial Review," Michigan Law Review 91 (1993): 577 (arguing that courts are not systematically less majoritarian than the political branches of government).
157. Lino Graglia, "Judicial Review on the Basis of 'Regime Principles': A Prescription for Government by Judges," Southern Texas Law Journal 26 (1985): 436
158. Stephen Macedo, The New Right v. the Constitution (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1987), 97.
159. Richard A. Epstein, "The Proper Scope of the Commerce Power," Virginia Law Review 73 (1987): 1388, 1395.
160. Grant S. Nelson and Robert J. Pushaw, Jr., "Rethinking the Commerce Clause: Applying First Principles to Uphold Federal Commercial Regulations but Preserve State Control over Social Issues," Iowa Law Review 85 (1999): 1 at 40 n. 163
161. Robert J. Pushaw, Jr., and Grant S. Nelson, "A Critique of the Narrow Interpretation of the Commerce Clause," Northwestern University Law Review 96 (2002): 695, at 700.
162. Randy E. Barnett, "New Evidence of the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause," Arkansas Law Review 55 (2003), at 865-57.
163. Charles E. Clark and Charles Wetherell, "The Measure of Maturity: The Pennsylvania Gazette from 1728-1765," William and Mary Quarterly 46 (1989): 279-80.
164. William Winslow Crosskey, Politics and the Constitution in the History of the United States (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953).
165. Keith A. Ehrman and Dennis A. Henigan, "The Second Amendment in the Twentieth Century: Have You Seen Your Militia Lately?" University of Dayton Law Review (1989): 5, 57
166. James H. Hutson, ed., Supplement to Max Farrand's The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), 187.
167. Arthur Bestor, "The American CivilWar as a Constitutional Crisis," American Historical Review 69 (1964): 327, 342.
168. Randy E. Barnett, "The Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause," University of Chicago Law Review 68 (2001): 101, 119-20.
169. James Madison, "Letter to Judge Roane" (September 2, 1819), in Madison, Letters, 3:143-44
170. David E. Engdahl, "The Necessary and Proper Clause as an Intrinsic Restraint on Federal Lawmaking Power," Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 22 (1998): 120.
171. Christopher Tiedeman, Treatise on the Limitations of Police Power in the United States (St. Louis, Mo.: F. H. Thomas, 1886), 1-2.
172. Laurence H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, 3d ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 2000), 1047.
173. Thomas M. Cooley, A Treatise on Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Power of the United States of the American Union (Boston: Little, Brown, 1868).
174. Martin Shapiro, "The Supreme Court's 'Return' to Economic Regulation," in Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek, eds., Studies in American Political Development (New Haven: Yale University Press 1986), 134.
175. Randy E. Barnett, "The Police Power," Notre Dame Law Review 79 (forthcoming).
176. Gerald Gunther, "Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection," Harvard Law Review 86 (1972): 8.
177. Michael Stokes Paulson, "Medium Rare Scrutiny," Constitutional Commentary 15 (1998): 397.
178. Suzanne Goldberg, "Equality without Tiers," Southern California Law Review 77 (2004).
179. Sanford Levinson, "Bush v. Gore and the French Revolution: A Tentative List of Some Early Lessons," Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (2002): 11.
180. Richard A. Epstein, Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985).