|
Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 41-47
|
Assisted suicide: the philosophers' brief.
a a a a a a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL STRESS;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
NEW YORK;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIANS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WASHINGTON;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0031587707
PISSN: 00287504
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (152)
|
References (0)
|