Organizational Ambidexterity Through the Lens of Paradox Theory: Building a Novel Research Agenda

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 71-93

  Papachroni, Angeliki ^a   Heracleous, Loizos ^b   Paroutis, Sotirios ^b  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ambidexterity; exploitation; exploration; paradox

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922879194     PISSN: 00218863     EISSN: 15526879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021886314553101     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adler P. S.,Goldoftas B.,Levine D. I.Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system.Organization Science. 1999;10:43-68
2. Andriopoulos C.,Lewis M. W.Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation.Organization Science. 2009;20:696-717
3. Argyris C.,Schön D.Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1978:
4. Beckman C. M.The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:741-758
5. Beech N.,Burns H.,De Caestecker L.,Macintosh R.,Maclean D.Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations.Human Relations. 2004;57:1313-1332
6. Benner M. J.,Tushman M. L.Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited.Academy of Management Review. 2003;28:238-256
7. Birkinshaw J.,Gibson C.Building ambidexterity into an organization.MIT Sloan Management Review. 2004;45:47-55
8. Bloodgood J. M.,Chae B.Organizational paradoxes: Dynamic shifting and integrative management.Management Decision. 2010;48:85-104
9. Bouchikhi H.Living with and building on complexity: A constructivist perspective on organizations.Organization. 1998;5:217-232
10. Boumgarden P.,Nickerson J.,Zenger T. R.Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance.Strategic Management Journal. 2012;33:587-610
11. Burgelman R. A.Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research.Organization Science. 1991;2:239-262
12. Burgelman R. A.,Grove A. S.Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity.Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28:965-979
13. Cameron K. S.An empirical investigation of the multiple constituencies model of organizational effectiveness. Ann Arbor: Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Michigan; 1986:
14. Cameron K. S.,Quinn R. E.Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Quinn R. E.Cameron K. S., ed. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1988:1-18.
15. Cao Q.,Gedajlovic E.,Zhang H.Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects.Organization Science. 2009;20:781-796
16. Carmeli A.,Halevi M. Y.How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity.Leadership Quarterly. 2009;20:207-218
17. Chae B.,Bloodgood J. M.The paradoxes of knowledge management: An Eastern philosophical perspective.Information and Organization. 2006;16:1-26
18. Chahrazad A.,Denis J.-L.,Langley A.Having your cake and eating it too: Discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics.Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2011;24:333-348
19. Chen M-J.Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective.Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2002;19:179-199
20. Clegg S. R.,Da Cunha J. V.,E Cunha M. P.Management paradoxes: A relational view.Human Relations. 2002;55:483-503
21. Devins G.,Kähr C.More than bricks in the wall: Organizational perspectives for sustainable success. Stadtler L.Schmitt A.Klarner P.Straub Th., ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer Gabler; 2010:60-67.
22. Duncan R. B.The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation. Kilmann R. H.Pondy L. R.Slevin D., ed. New York, NY: North Holland; 1976:167-188.
23. Eisenhardt K. M.Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism.Academy of Management Review. 2000;25:703-705
24. Eisenhardt K. M.,Furr N. R.,Bingham C. B.Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments.Organization Science. 2010;21:1263-1273
25. Fang C.,Lee J.,Schilling M. A.Balancing exploration and exploitation Through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning.Organization Science. 2010;21:625-642
26. Farjoun M.Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality.Academy of Management Review. 2010;35:202-225
27. Ford J. D.,Backoff R. W.Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Quinn R. E.Cameron K. S., ed. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1988:81-121.
28. Fredberg T.If I say it’s complex, it bloody well will be. CEO strategies for managing paradox.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50:171-188
29. Geerts A.,Blindenbach-Driessen F.,Gemmel P.Achieving a balance between exploration and exploitation in service firms: A longitudinal study.Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2010;:1-6
30. Ghemawat P.,Costa J. E.The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency.Strategic Management Journal. 1993;14:59-73
31. Gibson C. B.,Birkinshaw J.The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity.Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:209-226
32. Gupta A. K.,Smith K. G.,Shalley C. E.The interplay between exploration and exploitation.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:693-706
33. Güttel W. H.,Konlechner S. W.Continuously hanging by a thread: Managing contextually ambidextrous organizations.Schmalenbach Business Review. 2009;61:150-172
34. Hamel G.,Prahalad C. K.Strategy as stretch and leverage.Harvard Business Review. 1993;71:75-84
35. Hampden-Turner C.Corporate culture: From vicious to virtuous circles. London, England: Piatkus; 1994:
36. He Z-L.,Wong P-K.Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis.Organization Science. 2004;15:481-494
37. Heracleous L.Quantum strategy at Apple Inc.Organizational Dynamics. 2013;42:92-99
38. Heracleous L.,Wirtz J.Singapore Airlines’ balancing act.Harvard Business Review. 2010;88 (7/8): 145-149
39. Heracleous L.,Wirtz J.Singapore Airlines: Achieving sustainable advantage through mastering paradox.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50:150-170
40. Huy Q. N.Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2002;47:31-69
41. Isaacson W.The real leadership lessons of Steve Jobs.Harvard Business Review. 2012;90 (4): 93-102
42. Jansen J. J. P.,Tempelaar M. P.,Van Den Bosch F. a. J.,Volberda H. W.Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms.Organization Science. 2009;20:797-811
43. Jansen J. J. P.,Van Den Bosch F. a. J.,Volberda H. W.Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents.Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR). 2005;57:351-363
44. Jansen J. J. P.,Vera D.,Crossan M.Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism.Leadership Quarterly. 2009;20:5-18
45. Jarzabkowski P.,Sillince J.A rhetoric-in-context approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1639-1665
46. Judge W. Q.,Blocker C. P.Organizational capacity for change and strategic ambidexterity. Flying the plane while rewiring it.European Journal of Marketing. 2008;42:915-926
47. Kauppila O-P.Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships.Strategic Organization. 2010;8:283-312
48. Lassen A. H.,Waehrens B. V.,Boer H.Re-orienting the corporate entrepreneurial journey: Exploring the role of middle management.Creativity and Innovation Management. 2009;18:16-23
49. Levinthal D. A.,March J. G.The myopia of learning.Strategic Management Journal. 1993;14:95-112
50. Lewis M. W.Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide.Academy of Management Review. 2000;25:760-776
51. Lewis M. W.,Smith W. K.Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50:127-149
52. Lubatkin M. H.,Simsek Z.,Yan L.,Veiga J. F.Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration.Journal of Management. 2006;32:646-672
53. Luscher L. S.,Lewis M.,Ingram A.The social construction of organizational change paradoxes.Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2006;19:491-502
54. March J. G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.Organization Science. 1991;2:71-87
55. Markides C.,Charitou C. D.Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach.Academy of Management Executive. 2004;18:22-36
56. Markides C.,Oyon D.What to do against disruptive business models (when and how to play two games at once).Sloan Management Review. 2010;51 (4): 25-32
57. Martini A.,Laugen B. R. T.,Gastaldi L.,Corso M.Continuous innovation: Towards a paradoxical, ambidextrous combination of exploration and exploitation.International Journal of Technology Management. 2013;61:1-22
58. Mom T. J. M.,Van Den Bosch F. a. J.,Volberda H. W.Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows.Journal of Management Studies. 2007;44:910-931
59. Mom T. J. M.,Van Den Bosch F. a. J.,Volberda H. W.Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms.Organization Science. 2009;20:812-828
60. Nemanich L. A.,Keller R. T.,Vera D.Managing the exploration/exploitation paradox in new product development: How top executives define their firm’s innovation trajectory.International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 2007;4:351-374
61. O’Reilly C. A.,Tushman M. L.The ambidextrous organization.Harvard Business Review. 2004;82:74-81
62. O’Reilly C. A.,Tushman M. L.Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma.Research in Organizational Behavior. 2008;28:185-206
63. O’Reilly C. A.,Tushman M. L.Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. 2013;:
64. Patel P. C.,Messersmith J. G.,Lepak D. P.Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity.Academy of Management Journal. 2013;56:1420-1442
65. Poole M. S.,Van De Ven A. H.Using paradox to build management and organization theories.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:562-578
66. Porter M.Competitive strategy. New York, NY: Free Press; 1980:
67. Raisch S.,Birkinshaw J.Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators.Journal of Management. 2008;34:375-409
68. Raisch S.,Birkinshaw J.,Probst G.,Tushman M. L.Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance.Organization Science. 2009;20:685-695
69. Rescher N.Paradoxes, their roots, range and resolution. Chicago, IL: Open Court; 2001:
70. Rothaermel F. T.,Alexandre M. T.Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderaing role of absrorptive capacity.Organization Science. 2009;4:759-780
71. Seet P.-S.Reconciling entrepreneurial dilemmas. A case study of a huaqiao entrepreneur in China.Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. 1997;3 (3): 74-97
72. Siggelkow N.,Levinthal D. A.Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation.Organization Science. 2003;14:650-669
73. Simsek Z.Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46:597-624
74. Simsek Z.,Heavey C.,Veiga J. F.,Souder D.A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46:864-894
75. Smith W. K.,Binns A.,Tushman M. L.Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously.Long Range Planning. 2010;43:448-461
76. Smith W. K.,Lewis M. W.Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:381-403
77. Smith W. K.,Tushman M. L.Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams.Organization Science. 2005;16:522-536
78. Sundaramurthy C.,Lewis M.Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance.Academy of Management Review. 2003;28:397-415
79. Taylor A.,Helfat C. E.Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity.Organization Science. 2009;20:718-739
80. Trompenaars F.,Hampden-Turner C.Riding the waves of culture. 1997. Riding the waves of culture (2nd ed.). London, England: Nicholas Brealey.London, England: Nicholas Brealey; 1997:
81. Turner N.,Swart J.,Maylor H.Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews. 2013;15:317-332
82. Tushman M. L.,O’Reilly C. A.Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change.California Management Review. 1996;38:8-30
83. Tushman M. L.,Smith W.The Blackwell companion to organizations. Baum J., ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 2002:386-414.
84. Uotila J.,Maula M.,Keil T.,Zahra S. A.Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations.Strategic Management Journal. 2009;30:221-231
85. Van Looy B.,Martens T.,Debackere K.Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations.Creativity and Innovation Management. 2005;14:208-221
86. Volberda H. W.Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments.Organization Science. 1996;7:359-374
87. Voss G. B.,Voss Z. G.Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains.Organization Science. 2013;24:1459-1477
88. Westenholz A.Paradoxical thinking and change in the frames of reference.Organization Studies. 1993;14:37-58