Instruction of hematopoietic lineage choice by cytokine signaling

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 329, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 207-213

  Endele, Max ^a   Etzrodt, Martin ^a   Schroeder, Timm ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biosensors; Cytokines; Hematopoiesis; Lineage choice; Signaling

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE; CYTOKINE RECEPTOR;

BIODIVERSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LEVEL; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MANIPULATION; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEMATOPOIESIS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STEM CELL; STEM CELL NICHE; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOKINES; HEMATOPOIESIS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84922479489     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.011     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Rieger M.A., Schroeder T. Hematopoiesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4:1-17.
2. Enver T., Heyworth C.M., Dexter T.M. Do stem cells play dice?. Blood 1998, 92:348-351. (discussion 352).
3. Metcalf D. Lineage commitment and maturation in hematopoietic cells: the case for extrinsic regulation. Blood 1998, 92:345-347. (discussion 352).
4. Hu M., et al. Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. Genes Dev. 1997, 11:774-785.
5. Chang H.H., Hemberg M., Barahona M., Ingber D.E., Huang S. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 2008, 453:544-547.
6. Robb L. Cytokine receptors and hematopoietic differentiation. Oncogene 2007, 26:6715-6723.
7. Fairbairn L.J., Cowling G.J., Reipert B.M., Dexter T.M. Suppression of apoptosis allows differentiation and development of a multipotent hemopoietic cell line in the absence of added growth factors. Cell 1993, 74:823-832.
8. Akashi K., Kondo M., von Freeden-Jeffry U., Murray R., Weissman I.L. Bcl-2 rescues T lymphopoiesis in interleukin-7 receptor-deficient mice. Cell 1997, 89:1033-1041.
9. Lagasse E., Weissman I.L. Enforced expression of Bcl-2 in monocytes rescues macrophages and partially reverses osteopetrosis in op/op mice. Cell 1997, 89:1021-1031.
10. Stoffel R., et al. Permissive role of thrombopoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptors in hematopoietic cell fate decisions in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:698-702.
11. Semerad C.L., Poursine-Laurent J., Liu F., Link D.C. A role for G-CSF receptor signaling in the regulation of hematopoietic cell function but not lineage commitment or differentiation. Immunity 1999, 11:153-161.
12. Kondo M., et al. Cell-fate conversion of lymphoid-committed progenitors by instructive actions of cytokines. Nature 2000, 407:383-386.
13. King A.G., Kondo M., Scherer D.C., Weissman I.L. Lineage infidelity in myeloid cells with TCR gene rearrangement: a latent developmental potential of proT cells revealed by ectopic cytokine receptor signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:4508-4513.
14. Borzillo G.V, Ashmun R.A., Sherr C.J. Macrophage lineage switching of murine early pre-B lymphoid cells expressing transduced fms genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10:2703-2714.
15. Pawlak G., Grasset M.F., Arnaud S., Blanchet J.P., Mouchiroud G. Receptor for macrophage colony-stimulating factor transduces a signal decreasing erythroid potential in the multipotent hematopoietic EML cell line. Exp. Hematol. 2000, 28:1164-1173.
16. McArthur G.A., Rohrschneider L.R., Johnson G.R. Induced expression of c-fms in normal hematopoietic cells shows evidence for both conservation and lineage restriction of signal transduction in response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 1994, 83:972-981.
17. McArthur G.A., Longmore G.D., Klingler K., Johnson G.R. Lineage-restricted recruitment of immature hematopoietic progenitor cells in response to Epo after normal hematopoietic cell transfection with EpoR. Exp. Hematol. 1995, 23:645-654.
18. Pharr P.N., Ogawa M., Hofbauer A., Longmore G.D. Expression of an activated erythropoietin or a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor by pluripotent progenitors enhances colony formation but does not induce differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:7482-7486.
19. Metcalf D., Burgess A.W. Clonal analysis of progenitor cell commitment of granulocyte or macrophage production. J. Cell. Physiol. 1982, 111:275-283.
20. Rieger M.A., Hoppe P.S., Smejkal B.M., Eitelhuber A.C., Schroeder T. Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Science 2009, 325:217-218.
21. Grover A., et al. Erythropoietin guides multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells toward an erythroid fate. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211:181-188.
22. Tsapogas P., et al. In vivo evidence for an instructive role of fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) ligand in hematopoietic development. Haematologica 2014, 99:638-646.
23. Rothenberg E.V. T cell lineage commitment: identity and renunciation. J. Immunol. 2011, 186:6649-6655.
24. Rohde C.M., Schrum J., Lee A.W.-M. A juxtamembrane tyrosine in the colony stimulating factor-1 receptor regulates ligand-induced Src association, receptor kinase function, and down-regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:43448-43461.
25. Takeshita S., et al. c-Fms tyrosine 559 is a major mediator of M-CSF-induced proliferation of primary macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:18980-18990.
26. Marks D.C., et al. Expression of a Y559F mutant CSF-1 receptor in M1 myeloid cells: a role for Src kinases in CSF-1 receptor-mediated differentiation. Mol. Cell Biol. Res. Commun. 1999, 1:144-152.
27. Geest C.R., Coffer P.J. MAPK signaling pathways in the regulation of hematopoiesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 86:237-250.
28. Hsu C.-L., Kikuchi K., Kondo M. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway is involved in myeloid lineage commitment. Blood 2007, 110:1420-1428.
29. Chung E., Hsu C.-L., Kondo M. Constitutive MAP kinase activation in hematopoietic stem cells induces a myeloproliferative disorder. PLoS One 2011, 6:e28350.
30. Ross S.E., et al. Phosphorylation of C/EBPalpha inhibits granulopoiesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:675-686.
31. Geest C.R., et al. p38 MAP kinase inhibits neutrophil development through phosphorylation of C/EBPalpha on serine 21. Stem Cells 2009, 27:2271-2282.
32. Jack G.D., Zhang L., Friedman A.D. M-CSF elevates c-Fos and phospho-C/EBPalpha(S21) via ERK whereas G-CSF stimulates SHP2 phosphorylation in marrow progenitors to contribute to myeloid lineage specification. Blood 2009, 114:2172-2180.
33. Hernandez-Hernandez A., et al. Acetylation and MAPK phosphorylation cooperate to regulate the degradation of active GATA-1. EMBO J. 2006, 25:3264-3274.
34. Polak R., Buitenhuis M. The PI3K/PKB signaling module as key regulator of hematopoiesis: implications for therapeutic strategies in leukemia. Blood 2012, 119:911-923.
35. Buitenhuis M., et al. Protein kinase B (c-akt) regulates hematopoietic lineage choice decisions during myelopoiesis. Blood 2008, 111:112-121.
36. Kharas M.G., et al. Constitutively active AKT depletes hematopoietic stem cells and induces leukemia in mice. Blood 2010, 115:1406-1415.
37. Manz M.G., Boettcher S. Emergency granulopoiesis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14:302-314.
38. Nagai Y., et al. Toll-like receptors on hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulate innate immune system replenishment. Immunity 2006, 24:801-812.
39. Essers M.A.G., et al. IFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature 2009, 458:904-908.
40. De Bruin A.M., et al. IFNγ induces monopoiesis and inhibits neutrophil development during inflammation. Blood 2012, 119:1543-1554.
41. Esplin B.L., et al. Chronic exposure to a TLR ligand injures hematopoietic stem cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 186:5367-5375.
42. Zhao J.L., et al. Conversion of danger signals into cytokine signals by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for regulation of stress-induced hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14:445-459.
43. Marshall C.J. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 1995, 80:179-185.
44. Santos S.D.M., Verveer P.J., Bastiaens P.I.H. Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:324-330.
45. Werner S.L., Barken D., Hoffmann A. Stimulus specificity of gene expression programs determined by temporal control of IKK activity. Science 2005, 309:1857-1861.
46. Ashall L., et al. Pulsatile stimulation determines timing and specificity of NF-kappaB-dependent transcription. Science 2009, 324:242-246.
47. Tay S., et al. Single-cell NF-kappaB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 2010, 466:267-271.
48. Newman R.H., Fosbrink M.D., Zhang J. Genetically encodable fluorescent biosensors for tracking signaling dynamics in living cells. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111:3614-3666.
49. Endele M., Schroeder T. Molecular live cell bioimaging in stem cell research. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1266:18-27.
50. Schroeder T. Long-term single-cell imaging of mammalian stem cells. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:S30-S35.
51. Toettcher J.E., Weiner O.D., Lim W. a. Using optogenetics to interrogate the dynamic control of signal transmission by the Ras/Erk module. Cell 2013, 155:1422-1434.
52. Inoue T., Heo W.Do, Grimley J.S., Wandless T.J., Meyer T. An inducible translocation strategy to rapidly activate and inhibit small GTPase signaling pathways. Nat. Methods 2005, 2:415-418.