The capacities of institutions for the integration of ecosystem services in coastal strategic planning: The case of Jiaozhou Bay

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 107, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-15

  Li, Ruiqian ^a   Li, Yongfu ^b   van den Brink, Margo ^a   Woltjer, Johan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTE OF OCEANOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Capacity; Coastal strategic planning; Ecosystem services; Institution; Jiaozhou Bay

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CAPACITY; CONTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INSTITUTIONAL SETTING; INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE; INTER-ORGANISATIONAL; JIAOZHOU BAY; MULTI-LEVEL ANALYSIS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INTEGRATED APPROACH; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

CHINA; JIAOZHOU BAY; SHANDONG;

EID: 84922382511     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alexander E.R. Institutional design for value capture and a case: the Tel-Aviv Metropolitan Park. Int. Plann. Stud 2012, 17:163-177.
2. Alexander E.R. Institutional transformation and planning: from institutionalization theory to institutional design. Plan. Theory 2005, 4:209-223.
3. Alexander E.R. Institutional design for sustainable development. Town Plann. Rev. 2006, 77:1-27.
4. Atkins J.P., Burdon D., Elliott M., Gregory A.J. Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62:215-226.
5. Barbier E.B., Hacker S.D., Kennedy C., Koch E.W., Stier A.C., Silliman B.R. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81:169-193.
6. Beaumont N.J., Austen M.C., Atkins J.P., Burdon D., Degraer S., Dentinho T.P., Derous S., Holm P., Horton T., Van Ierland E., Marboe A.H., Starkey D.J., Townsend M., Zarzycki T. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007, 54:253-265.
7. Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1394-1404.
8. Cao W., Wong M.H. Current status of coastal zone issues and management in China: a review. Environ. Int. 2007, 33:985-992.
9. Cárcamo P., Garay-Flühmann R., Gaymer C.F. Opportunities and constraints of the institutional framework for the implementation of ecosystem-based management: the case of the Chilean coast. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 84:193-203.
10. Carpenter S.R., Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11:29.
11. Carollo C., Reed D.J. Ecosystem-based management institutional design: balance between federal, state, and local governments within the Gulf of Mexico Alliance. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:178-181.
12. Cinner J.E., Basurto X., Fidelman P., Kuange J., Lahari R., Mukminin A. Institutional designs of customary fisheries management arrangements in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Mexico. Mar. Policy 2012, 36:278-285.
13. Crawford S.E.S., Ostrom E. Agrammar of institutions. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1995, 89:582-600.
14. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272.
15. Deboudt P. Testing integrated coastal zone management in France. Ocean Coast Manag. 2012, 57:62-78.
16. Ekstrom J.A., Young O.R. Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14:16.
17. Evans K.E., Klinger T. Obstacles to bottom-up implementation of marine ecosystem management. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:1135-1143.
18. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F.S., Coe1 M.T., Daily G.C., Gibbs H.K., Helkowski J.H., Holloway T., Howard E.A., Kucharik C.J., Monfreda C., Patz J.A., Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.K. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309:570-574.
19. Ge Y., Zhang J.Y. Analysis of the impact on ecosystem and environment of marine reclamation-A case study in Jiaozhou Bay. Energy Procedia 2011, 5:105-111.
20. Gelcich S., Edwards-Jones G., Kaiser M., Castilla J. Co-management policy can reduce resilience in traditionally managed marine ecosystems. Ecosystems 2006, 9:951-966.
21. Geneletti D. Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2011, 7:143-149.
22. Goldman R.L., Thompson B.H., Daily G.C. Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:333-343.
23. Haines-Young R., Potschin M., Kienast F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol. Ind. 2012, 21:39-53.
24. Hanna S.S. Institutions for managing resilient salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) ecosystems: the role of incentives and transaction costs. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13:35.
25. Hancock J. The case for an ecosystem service approach to decision-making: an overview. Biosci. Horiz. 2010, 3:188-196.
26. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Jax K. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 25:13-21.
27. Holt A.R., Godbold J.A., White P.C., Slater A.M., Pereira E.G., Solan M. Mismatches between legislative frameworks and benefits restrict the implementation of the Ecosystem approach in coastal environments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2011, 434:213-228.
28. Hogan D., Arthaud G., Brookshire D., Gunther T., Pincetl S., Shapiro C., Van Horne B. Developing an Institutional Framework to Incorporate Ecosystem Services into Decision Making: Workshop Proceedings 2011, Available from:. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1221/OFR2011-1221.pdf.
29. Hogan D., Arthaud G., Goodman I., Pattison M., Sayre, Roger S., Carl S., Van Horne B. Developing a Vision: Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Decision Making-Proceedings of a Workshop: U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 2009-1062 2009, Available from:. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1062/.
30. Kalikoski D.C., Vasconcellos M., Lavkulich L. Fitting institutions to ecosystems: the case of artisanal fisheries management in the estuary of Patos Lagoon. Mar. Policy 2002, 26:179-196.
31. Katsanevakis S., Stelzenmüller V., South A., Sørensen T.K., Jones P.J., Kerr S., Badalamentig F., Anagnostoua C., Breenc P., Chusth G., D'Annag G., Duijni M., Filatovaj T., Fiorentinog F., Hulsmanj H., Johnsonf K., Karageorgisa A.P., Krönckek I., Mirtog S., Pipitoneg C., Portellil S., Qiue W., Reissk H., Sakellarioua D., Salomidia M., Hoofm L.V., Vassilopouloua V., Fernándezg T.V., Vögek S., Webern A., Zenetosa A., Hofstede R.T. Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2011, 54:807-820.
32. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2010, Earthscan, London. P. Kumar (Ed.).
33. Lau M. Integrated coastal zone management in the People's Republic of China-An assessment of structural impacts on decision-making processes. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2005, 48:115-159.
34. Lau W.W. Beyond carbon: conceptualizing payments for ecosystem services in blue forests on carbon and other marine and coastal ecosystem services. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 83:5-14.
35. Lebel L., Daniel R. The governance of ecosystem services from tropical upland watersheds. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2009, 1:61-68.
36. Li H. The impacts and implications of the legal framework for sea use planning and management in China. Ocean Coast Manag. 2006, 49:717-726.
37. Lieberthal K. China's governing system and its impact on environmental policy implementation. Chin. Environ. Series 1997, 1:3-8.
38. Lopes R., Videira N. Valuing marine and coastal ecosystem services: an integrated participatory framework. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 84:153-162.
39. Maynard S., James D., Davidson A. An adaptive participatory approach for developing an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland, Australia. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2011, 7:182-189.
40. McKenzie E., Posner S., Tillmann P., Bernhardt J.R., Howard K., Rosenthal A. Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy 2014, 32:320-340.
41. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends 2005, Washington, Island Press, Washington DC.
42. Namaalwa S., Funk A., Ajie G.S., Kaggwa R.C. Acharacterization of the drivers, pressures, ecosystem functions and services of Namatala wetland, Uganda. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 34:44-57.
43. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Onaindia M., Fernández de Manuel B., Madariaga I., Rodríguez-Loinaz G. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 289:1-9.
45. Österblom H., Gårdmark A., Bergström L., Müller-Karulis B., Folke C., Lindegren M., Casini M., Olsson P., Diekmann R., Blenckner T., Humborg C., Möllmann C. Making the ecosystem approach operational-Can regime shifts in ecological and governance systems facilitate the transition?. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:1290-1299.
46. Ostrom E. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud. J. 2011, 39:7-27.
47. Pike K., Johnson D., Fletcher S., Wright P. Seeking spirituality: respecting the social value of coastal recreational resources in England and Wales. J.Coast. Res. 2011, 61:194-204.
48. Pittock J., Cork S., Maynard S. The state of the application of ecosystems services in Australia. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:111-120.
49. Piwowarczyk J., Kronenberg J., Dereniowska M.A. Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109:85-93.
50. Potts T., Burdon D., Jackson E., Atkins J., Saunders J., Hastings E., Langmead O. Do marine protected areas deliver flows of ecosystem services to support human welfare?. Mar. Policy 2014, 44:139-148.
51. Primmer E., Furman E. Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems?. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:85-92.
52. Qingdao Ocean and Fishery Bureau (QOFB) Shandong Province Interim Measures of Compensation and Loss Management for Marine Ecological Damage 2012, Available from:. http://ocean.qingdao.gov.cn/n12479801/n12480099/n12480177/24199474.html.
53. Rodríguez J.P., Beard T.D., Bennett E.M., Cumming G.S., Cork S.J., Agard J., Dobson A.P., Peterson G.D. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11:28.
54. Rönnbäck P., Kautsky N., Pihl L., Troell M., Söderqvist T., Wennhage H. Ecosystem goods and services from Swedish coastal habitats: Identification, valuation, and implications of ecosystem shifts. J.Hum. Environ. 2007, 36:534-544.
55. Ruckelshaus M., Klinger T., Knowlton N., DeMASTER D.P. Marine ecosystem-based management in practice: scientific and governance challenges. Bioscience 2008, 58:53-63.
56. Ruhl J.B., Gregg R.J. Integrating ecosystem services into environmental law: a case study of wetlands mitigation banking. Stanf. Environ. Law J. 2001, 20:365-392.
57. Salzman J., Thompson B.H., Daily G.C. Protecting ecosystem services: science, economics, and law. Stanf. Environ. Law J. 2001, 20:309.
58. Shandong Peninsula Blue Economic Zone Construction Office (SPBEZCO) Advisory Committee 2013, Available from:. http://www.sdlb.gov.cn/col/col537/index.html.
59. Shandong Statistics Bureau (SSB) 2011 Statistical Bulletin of the National Economic and Social Development of Shandong Province 2011, Available from:. http://www.stats-sd.gov.cn/disp/tjgb.asp?aa=1101201200.
60. Shandong Oceanic and Fishery Department (SOFD) Shandong Marine Function Zoning Plan (2011-2020) 2012.
61. State Oceanic Administration (SOA) Law on the Management of Sea Use 2001, Available from:. http://www.soa.gov.cn/law/1027.htm.
62. Söderman T., Saarela S.R. Biodiversity in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of municipal spatial plans in Finland. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 2010, 28:117-133.
63. Sutton-Grier A.E., Moore A.K., Wiley P.C., Edwards P.E. Incorporating ecosystem services into the implementation of existing US natural resource management regulations: operationalizing carbon sequestration and storage. Mar. Policy 2014, 43:246-253.
64. Valman M. Institutional stability and change in the Baltic Sea: 30 years of issues, crises and solutions. Mar. Policy 2013, 38:54-64.
65. Waylen K., Young J. Expectations and experiences of diverse forms of knowledge use: the case of the UK National ecosystem Assessment. Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy 2014, 32:229-246.
66. Wilkinson C., Saarne T., Peterson G.D., Colding J. Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept-an historical exploration. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18:37.
67. Williamson O.E. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J.Econ. Lit. 2000, 595-613.
68. Wu X.Q., Gao M., Wang D., Wang Y., Lu Q.S., Zhang Z.D. Framework and practice of integrated coastal zone management in Shandong Province, China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2012, 69:58-67.
69. Wu X.L., Sun J.H. Changes of the "Tiao-Kuai relations": issues, dilemma and way. J.Inn. Mong. Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2011, 13:264-266.
70. Zhao S.J., Jiao N.Z., Shen Z.L., Wu Y.L. Causes and consequences of changes in nutrient structure in the Jiaozhou Bay. J.Integrative Plant Biol. 2005, 47:396-410.