Institutional design for sustainable development

Town Planning Review

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-27

  Alexander, E R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b APD Alexander Planning and Design   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MILITARY GOVERNMENT; PLANNING PROCESS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ASIA; EURASIA; ISRAEL; MIDDLE EAST;

EID: 34248631407     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.77.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ALEXANDER, E. R. (1995), How Organizations Act Together: Interorganisational Coordination in Theory and Practice, Amsterdam, Gordon & Breach.
2. ALEXANDER, E. R. (1998), 'A structuration theory of interorganisational coordination: cases in environmental management', International Journal of Organisational Analysis, 6, 334-54.
3. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2000), 'Interorganisational coordination and strategic planning: the architecture of institutional design' in W. Salet and A. Faludi (eds), The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 159-74.
4. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2001a), 'A Transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control', Town Planning Review, 72, 45-75.
5. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2001b), 'Governance and transaction costs in planning systems: a conceptual framework for institutional analysis of land use planning and development control - the case of Israel', Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 28, 755-76.
6. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2002a), 'Acting together: from planning to institutional design' (paper presented at XIV AESOP Congress, Volos, Greece, 10-15 July 2002).
7. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2002b), 'Metropolitan-regional planning in Amsterdam: a case study', Town Planning Review, 73, 17-40.
8. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2004a), 'Planning and institutional transformation: cases and problems in institutional design' (paper presented at XVI AESOP Congress, Grenoble, France, 28-30 July 2004).
9. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2004b), 'Planning planning: reflections on redesigning the planning and building law (editorial)', Planning (IAP), 1, 3-11 (Hebrew).
10. ALEXANDER, E. R. (2005a). 'Institutional transformation and planning: from institutionalisation theory to institutional design'. Planning Theory. 4, 209-24.
11. ALEXANDER. E. R. (2005b), 'Implementing norms in practice: the institutional design of evaluation' in G. Patassini and D. Miller (eds), Beyond Cost-Benefit: Evaluating and Valuing Non-market Assets, Aldershot, Ashgate, 295-310.
12. ALTERMAN, R. (ed.) (2001), National Level Planning in Democratic Countries, Liverpool, Liverpool University Press.
13. AXELROD, D. (1988). Budgeting for Modern Government, New York, St Martins Press.
14. BIRD, A. and WIERSMA, M. F. (1996), 'Underlying assumptions of agency theory and implications for non-US settings' in P. A. Bamberger, M. Erez and S. B. Bacharach (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organisations (14), Greenwich, CN, JAI Press, 149-80.
15. BLACKLER, F., CRUMP, N. and MCDONALD S. (2000), 'Organising processes in complex activity networks', Organisation, 7, 277-300.
16. BOLAN, R. J. (1991), 'Planning and institutional design', Planning Theory, 5/6, 7-34.
17. BOLAN, R. J. (2000), 'Social interaction and institutional design: the case of housing in the US' in W. Salet and A. Faludi (eds), The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 25-38.
18. BRANDL, J. (1988). 'On politics and policy analysis as the design and assessment of institutions', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7, 419-24.
19. CALVERT, R. L. (1995), 'The rational choice theory of institutions: implications for design' in D. L. Weimer (ed.), Institutional Design, Boston MA, Kluver, 63-94.
20. COYNE, R. D., ROSENMAN, M. A., RADFORD, A. D., BALACHANDRAN, M. and GERO, S. (1990), Knowedge-based Design Systems, Reading. MA, Addison-Wesley.
21. CROWSTON, K. (1997), 'A coordination theory approach to process design', Organisation Science, 8, 157-75.
22. DERY, D. (1984), Problem Definition in Policy Analysis, Lawrence, KS, University of Kansas Press.
23. DIXIT, A. K. (1996). The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
24. DORADO, S. and MOLE, R. (1998), 'Privatisation: the core theories and the missing middle', International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64, 583-609.
25. EBRAHIM, A. (2004), 'Institutional preconditions to collaboration: Indian forest and irrigation policy in historical perspective', Administration & Society, 36, 208-42.
26. FALUDI, A. and WATERHOUT, B. (2002), The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective:No Masterplan, London, Routledge.
27. FLYVBERG, B. (1998), Rationality and Power, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
28. FRIEDMANN, J. (1987), Planning in the Public Domain, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
29. GUALINI, E. (2001), Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions, Aldershot, Ashgate.
30. HAN, I. (2004), 'The national committee for national infrastructures: an evaluative report', Planning (IAP), I, 49-57 (Hebrew; English abstract, 129).
31. HARRIS, N., HOOPER, A. AND BISHOP, K. (2002), 'Constructing the practice of "spatial planning": a national spatial planning framework for Wales', Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy, 20, 555-72.
32. HEALEY, P. (1999), 'Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning and shaping places', Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 211-22.
33. HOLMSTROM, B. and MILGROM, P. (1991), 'Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design', Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 7, 24-52.
34. INNES, J. E. (1995), 'Planning theory's emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 183-89.
35. KALAJI, A. (1993), personal communication to Iraeli Minister of Interior, 14 March (Hebrew).
36. KLITGAARD, R. (1991), 'Gifts and bribes' in R. J. Zeckhauser (ed.), Strategy and Chioce, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 211-39.
37. KWOKA, J. E. (2002), 'Governance alternatives and pricing in the electric power industry', Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 18, 278-94.
38. LINDER, S. H. AND PETERS, B. G. (1995), The two traditions of institutional designing: dialogue vs decision' in D. L. Weimer (ed.), Institutional Design, Boston MA, Kluver, 133-60.
39. LODGE, M. (2003), 'Institutional choice and policy transfer: reforming British and German railway regulation', Governance, 16, 159-78.
40. LOHMANN, S. (2003), 'An audience-cost theory of institutional commitment', Governance, 16, 95-110.
41. MARGERUM, R. D. (2002), 'Collaborative planning: building consensus and building a distinct model for practice', Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 237-53.
42. MARKUSEN, A. R. (2000), 'Planning as craft and as philosophy' in L. Rodwin and B. Sanyal (eds), The Profession of City Planning. New Brunswick, NJ, CUPR-Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 261-74.
43. MARKUSEN, A. R. (2003), The case against privatising national security', Governance, 16, 471-501.
44. MCDONNELL, L. and ELMORE, R. (1987), 'Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments', Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-52.
45. MILLER, G.J. (1992), Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy, New York, Cambridge University Press.
46. MINNERY, J. (2001), 'Interorganizational approaches to regional growth management', Town Planning Review, 72, 25-44.
47. NEEDLEMAN, M. L. and NEEDLEMAN, C. E. (1974), Guerillas in the Bureaucracy: The Community Planning Experiment in the US, New York, Wiley.
48. NORTH, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
49. OSTROM, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York, Cambridge University Press.
50. PIERRE, J. (1999), 'Models of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban politics', Urban Affairs Review, 34, 372-96.
51. POWELL, W. and DIMAGGIO, P. (eds) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, Chicago IL, University of Chicago Press.
52. PUTNAM, R. D. WITH LEONARDI, R. and NANETTI, R. (1998), Making Democracy work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton NJ. Princeton University Press.
53. RAADSCHNELDERS, J. C. N. (1998), 'Evolution, institutional analysis and path dependency: an administrative-history perspective on fashionable approaches and concepts', International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64, 563-82.
54. SALET, W. G. M. (1998), 'Designing institutions' (paper presented at XII AESOP Congress, Aveiro, Portugal, 22-25 July 1998).
55. SANYAL, B. (2000). 'Planning's three challenges' in L. Rodwin and B. Sanyal (eds), The Profession of City Planning, New Brunswick, NJ. CUPR-Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 312-33.
56. SCOTT. W. R. (1994), Institutions and Organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
57. SUSSKIND, L. and FIELD, P. (1996), Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes, New York, The Free Press.
58. TEWDR-JONES, M., and ALLMENDINGER, P. (1998), 'Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning', Environment & Planning A, 30, 1975-99.
59. THOMPSON, M. and RICHARDSON, T. (2002), 'Strategic environmental assessment and the prospects for the sustainable development of the North Sea region' (paper presented at XIV AESOP Congress, Volos, Greece, 10-15 July 2002).
60. UPHOFF, N. (1986), Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook with Cases, West Hartford, CT, Kumarian Press.
61. USLANER, E. M. (1998). 'Field of dreams: the weak reeds of institutional design' in K. Soltan, E. M. Uslaner and V. I. Haufler (eds), Institutions and Social Order, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, 101-27.
62. VERMA, N. (ed.) (2006), Institutions and Planning, New Brunswick, NJ, CUPR-Rutgers State University of New Jersey Press (forthcoming).
63. WEIMER, D. L. (1995), 'Institutional design: overview' in D. L. Weimer (ed.), Institutional Design, Boston MA. Kluver, 1-16.
64. WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York, Free Press.
65. WILDAVSKY, A. (1992), The New Politics of the Budgetary Process (second edition), New York, Harper-Collins.
66. WOLSINK, M. (2003). 'Reshaping the Dutch planning system: a learning process?', Environment & Planning A, 35, 703-723.