Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: Do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems?

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 85-92

  Primmer, Eeva ^a   Furman, Eeva ^a  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Governance; Knowledge systems; Land use planning; Natural resource management; Operationalisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868266965     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Anderson B.J., et al. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46:888-896.
2. Barton D.N. The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 2002, 42:147-164.
3. Bateman I., Mace G., Fezzi C., Atkinson G., Turner K. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 48:177-218.
4. Bernhardt-Römermann M., Gray A., Vanbergen A., Bergè L., Bohner A., Brooker R.W., De Bruyn L., Dirnböck T., Grandin U., Hester A.J., Kanka R., Klotz S., Loucougaray G., Lundin L., Matteucci G., Mésza I., Oláh V., Preda E., Prévosto B., Pykälä J., Schmidt W., Taylor M.E., Vadineanu A., Waldmann T., Stadler J. Functional traits and local environment predict vegetation responses to disturbance: a pan-European multi-site experiment. Journal of Ecology 2011, 99:777-787.
5. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:17-29.
6. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Díaz S., Dietz T., Duraiappah A.K., Oteng-Yeboah A., Pereira H.M., Perrings C., Reid W.V., Sarukhan J., Scholes R.J., Whyte A. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 2009, 106(5):1305-1312.
7. Cash D.W., Adger W., Berkes F., Garden P., Lebel L., Olsson P., Pritchard L., Young O. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):8.
8. Cashore B., Vertinsky I. Policy networks and firm behaviours: governance systems and firm reponses to external demands for sustainable forest management. Policy Sciences 2000, 33:1-30.
9. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 2012, 74:8-18.
10. Chen N., Huancheng L., Lihong W. A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. Ecological Economics 2008, 68:2768-2776.
11. Chapin F.Stuart, Zavaleta Erika S., Eviner Valerie T., Naylor Rosamond L., Vitousek Peter M., Reynolds Heather L., Hooper David U., Sandra Lavorel, Sala Osvaldo E., Hobbie Sarah E., Mack Michelle C., Díaz Sandra Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405:236-242.
12. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Naeem S., Limburg K., Paruelo J., O'Neill R.V., Raskin R., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
13. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington, DC. G.C. Daily (Ed.).
14. Daly H.E. Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 1990, 2(1):1-6.
15. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7:260-272.
16. Donovan G.H., Butry D.T. Trees in the city; valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 94:77-83.
17. Elmqvist T., Folke C., Nyström M., Peterson G., Bengtsson J., Walker B., Norberg J. Response diversity, ecosystem change and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2003, 1:488-494.
18. Farley J., Costanza S. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:2060-2068.
19. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993, 739-755.
20. Gamfeldt L., Hillebrand H., Jonsson P.R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 2008, 89:1223-1231.
21. Grumbine R.E. What is ecosystem management?. Conservation Biology 1994, 8(1):27-38.
22. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems 2002, Island Press, Washington, DC. L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling (Eds.).
23. Hein L., van Koppen K., de Groot R.S., van Ierland E.C. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2006, 57:209-228.
24. Hiedanpää J., Kotilainen J., Salo M. Unfolding the organised irresponsibility: ecosystem approach and the quest for forest biodiversity in Finland, Peru and Russia. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 13:159-165.
25. Hooper D.U., Chapin F.S., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setälä H., Symstad A.J., Vandermeer J., Wardle D.A. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 2005, 75(1):3-35.
26. Hukkinen J. Institutions, environmental management and long-term ecological sustenance. Ambio 1998, 27(2):112-117.
27. Imperial M.T. Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management 1999, 24(4):449-465.
28. Isbell F., Calcagno V., Hector A., Connolly J., Harpole W., Reich P., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Schmid B., Tilman D., van Ruijven J., Weigelt A., Wilsey B., Zavaleta E., Loreau M. High plant diversity is needed ecosystem services. Nature 2011, 477:199-203.
29. IUCN, 1993. Parks for Life: Report of the IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
30. Jokinen, Ari, Nygren, Nina, Haila, Yrjö, Schrader, Marko, 2007. Yhteiseloa liito-oravan kanssa. Liito-orava Tampereen kaupunkiseudun kaavoituksessa-hankkeen loppuraportti. Suomen ympäristö 20. Pirkanmaan ympäristökeskus, Tampere.
31. Juutinen A., Mäntymaa E., Mönkkönen M., Svento R. Voluntary agreements in protecting privately owned forests in Finland-to buy or to lease?. Forest Policy and Economics 2008, 10:230-239.
32. Juutinen A., Mönkkönen M., Ollikainen M. Do environmental diversity approaches lead to improved site selection? A comparison with the multi-species approach. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255:3750-3757.
33. Kaljonen Bringing back the lost biotopes: the practice of regional biodiversity management planning in Finland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2008, 10(2):113-132.
34. Karhu K., Wall A., Vanhala P., Liski J., Esala M., Regina K. Effects of afforestation and deforestation on boreal soil carbon stocks-comparison of measured C stocks with Yasso07 model. Geoderma 2011, 164(1-2):33-45.
35. Kivimaa P., Mickwitz P. Public policy as a part of transforming energy systems: framing bioenergy in Finnish energy policy. Journal of Cleaner Production 2011, 19:1812-1821.
36. Kelty M.J. The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 2006, 233(2-3):195-204.
37. KMO, 2010. Kansallinen metsäohjelma 2015. Lisää hyvinvointia monimuotoisista metsistä-Valtioneuvoston periaatepäätös. Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö.
38. Korpela K.M., Ylén M., Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H. Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promotion International 2010, 25(2):200-210.
39. Kumar P. Foundations, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, Toimittanut 2010, Earthscan, London.
40. Kyttä M., Kahila M., Broberg A. Perceived environmental quality as an input to urban infill policy-making. Urban Design International 2011, 16(1):19-35.
41. Lehtomäki J., Tomppo E., Kuokkanen P., Hanski I., Moilanen A. Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 258:2439-2449.
42. Luonnonvaraselonteko, 2010. Älykäs ja vastuullinen luonnonvaratalous. Valtioneuvoston luonnonvaraselonteko eduskunnalle. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö.
43. Maas J., Verheij R.A., de Vries S., Speeuwenberg P., Schellevis F.G., Groenenwegen P.P. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2009, 63:967-973.
44. Mace G.M., Norris K., Fitter A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2012, 27(1):19-26.
45. Maes, J., et al., 2011. A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis-phase 1. PEER Report no. 3. Ispra: Partnership for European Environmental Research.
46. McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Peper P.J., Xiao Q. Benefit-cost analysis of modesto's municipal urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 1999, 25(5):235-248.
47. METSO, 2002. Government Decision in Principle on an Action Programme to Protect Biodiversity in Forests in Southern Finland, the Western Parts of the Province of Oulu and the South-Western regions of the Province of Lapland. 23 October 2002.
48. METSO, 2008. Government Decision in Principle on an Action Programme to Protect Biodiversity in Forests in Southern Finland 2008-2016 (METSO-Programme). 27 March 2008.
49. MA, 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), Synthesis, Island Press, Washington DC. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. 137S-Washington D.C. (Island Press).
50. Mönkkönen M., Ylisirniö A.-L., Hämäläinen T. Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of boreal-forest biodiversity. Conservation Biology 2009, 23(2):339-347.
51. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P.H. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1202-1208.
52. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., Ricketts T.H. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(28):9495-9500.
53. Niemelä J., Saarela S.-R., Söderman T., Kopperoinen L., Yli-Pelkonen V., Väre S. Kaupunkiluonnon ekosysteemipalvelut (Ecosystem services of urban nature). Hyödyllinen luonto-Ekosysteemipalvelut hyvinvointimme perustana (Beneficial nature-Ecosystem services as the basis of our well-being) 2010, 203-223. Vastapaino, Tampere. J. Hiedanpää, A. Naskali, L. Suvantola (Eds.).
54. Norgaard R.B. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future 1994, Routledge, London.
55. Norgaard R.B. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1219-1227.
56. Olsson P., Folke C., Berkes F. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 2004, 34(1):75-90.
57. Ostrom Elinor Governing the Commons: The evolution of Institutions For Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 280 p.
58. Paavola J. Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecological Economics 2007, 63:93-103.
59. Paloniemi R., Varho V. Changing ecological and cultural states and preferences of nature conservation policy: the case of nature values trade in South-Western Finland. Journal of Rural Studies 2009, 25(1):87-97.
60. Paloniemi R., Tikka P.M. Ecological and social aspects of biodiversity conservation on private lands. Environmental Science and Policy 2008, 336-346.
61. Primmer E. Analysis of institutional adaptation: integration of biodiversity conservation into forestry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2011, 19(16):1822-1832.
62. Primmer, E., Kopperoinen, L., Ratamäki, O., Vihervaara, P., Rinne, J., Inkiläinen, E., Mashkina, O. Ekosysteemipalveluiden hyötyjen ja arvojen tarkastelu - näkökulmia päätöksenteon tueksi. Suomen ympäristö, in press.
63. Primmer E., Kyllönen S. Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development and the preparatory process of the finnish national forest programme. Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8(8):838-853.
64. Primmer E., Wolf S. Empirical accounting of adaptation to environmental change: organizational competencies and biodiversity in finnish forest management. Ecology and Society 2009, 14(2). Art. 27.
65. Raitanen, E., May, 2011. EU State Aid Regulation & Incentives for Forest Biodiversity conservation. Study of the Constraints. Pro Gradu Thesis. Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Turku. 90p.
66. Rantala T., Primmer E. Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland. Environmental Science and Policy 2003, 6(3):205-216.
67. Rivera J., Oetzel J., deLeon P., Starik M. Business responses to environmental and social protection policies: toward a framework for analysis. Policy Sciences 2009, 42:3-32.
68. Rydin Y., Falleth E. Networks and Institutions in Natural Resource Management 2006, Edward Elgar, Celtenhamn, UK.
69. Sagoff M. The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2011, 70:497-502.
70. Söderman T., Saarela S.-R. Biodiversity in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of municipal spatial plans in Finland. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2010, 28(2):117-133.
71. Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Shemeikka, P. Ecosystem services criteria for sustainable development in urban regions. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333212500081.
72. Spash C.L., Hanley N.D. Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics 1995, 12(3):191-208.
73. Suihkonen, L., Ahtikoski, A., Hänninen, R., Hynynen, J., Loiskekoski, M., 2011. Määräaikaiset suojelukorvaukset ja laskennalliset tulonmenetykset vapaaehtoisessa metsien monimuotoisuuden turvaamisessa. Metlan työraportteja/Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 207.
74. Suostrategia, 2011. Ehdotus soiden ja turvemaiden kestävän ja vastuullisen käytön ja suojelun kansalliseksi strategiaksi. Työryhmämuistio. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö.
75. Sutherland W.J., Pullin A.S., Dolman P.M., Knight T.M. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004, 19(6):35-38.
76. Tahvonen O., Pukkala T., Laiho O., Lahde E., Niinimaki S. Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 26(1):106-115.
77. TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
78. Tilman D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 1999, 80(5):1455-1474.
79. Troy A., Wilson M.A. Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics 2006, 60:435-449.
80. Tyrväinen L. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management 2001, 62(1):75-92.
81. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2207-2215.
82. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1245-1252.
83. Vatn A., Bromley D.W. Choices without prices without apologies. The Handbook of Environmental Economics 1995, 3-25. Blackwell Publishers. D.W. Bromley (Ed.).
84. Vauramo S., Setala H. Decomposition of labile and recalcitrant litter types under different plant communities in urban soils. Urban Ecosystems 2011, 14(1):59-70.
85. Vihervaara P., Kumpula T., Tanskanen A., Burkhard B. Ecosystem services-a tool for sustainable management of human-environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7(3):410-420.
86. Vihervaara P., Marjokorpi A., Kumpula T., Walls M., Kamppinen M. Ecosystem services of fast-growing tree plantations: a case study on integrating social valuations with land-use changes in Uruguay. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 14:58-68.
87. Wallace K.J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 2007, 139:235-246.
88. Yli-Pelkonen V. Ecological information in the political decisionmaking of urban land-use planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2008, 51:345-362.