Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept - An historical exploration

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Wilkinson, Cathy ^a,b,c   Saarne, Toomas ^b   Peterson, Garry D ^b   Colding, Johan ^d,e  

^a STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics   (Sweden)

^e ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Melbourne; Stockholm; Strategic spatial planning; Urban ecology; Urban governance

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN POLICY;

AUSTRALIA; MELBOURNE; STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN; VICTORIA [AUSTRALIA];

EID: 84876781979     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05368-180137     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bayon, R. 2004. Making environmental markets work: lessons from early experience with sulfur, carbon, wetlands, and other related markets. Forest Trends, Katoomba Group Meeting in Locarno, Switzerland, 2003. Forest Trends, Washington, D. C., USA.
2. Bai, X. 2007. Integrating global environmental concerns into urban management: the scale and readiness arguments. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(2):15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1202
3. Bai, X., R. McAllister, R. Beaty, and B. Taylor. 2010. Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2(3):129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.008
4. Bennett, E. M., G. D. Peterson, and L. J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12:1394-1404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
5. Bolund, P., and S. Hunhammar. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29:293-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
6. Bryant, A., and K. Charmaz, editors. 2007. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
7. Carson, R. 1962. Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
8. Colding, J. 2007. Ecological land-use complementation for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 81:46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2006.10.016
9. Colding, J. 2011. The role of ecosystem services incontemporary urban planning. Pages 228-237 in J. Niemelä, editor. Urban ecology: patterns, processes and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
10. Colding, J., J. Lundberg, and C. Folke. 2006. Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35:237-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/05-A-098R.1
11. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, G. R. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van der Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
12. Daily, G. C., editor. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence of ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
13. Daily, G. C., S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P. M. Kareiva, H. Mooney, L. Pejchar, T. H. Ricketts, J. Salzman, and R. Shallenberger. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:21-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/080025
14. Ernstson, H., S. Barthel, E. Andersson, and S. Borgström. 2010. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 15(4):28. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art28/
15. Folke, C., Å. Jansson, J. Larsson, and R. Costanza. 1997. Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26:3.
16. Folke, C., Å. Jansson, J. Rockström, P. Olsson, S. Carpenter, F. Chapin, A. S. Crépin, G. C. Daily, K. Danell, J. Ebbesson, T. Elmqvist, V. Galaz, F. Moberg, M. Nilsson, H. Österblom, E. Ostrom, Å. Persson, G. Peterson, S. Polasky, W. Steffen, B. Walker, and F. Westley. 2011. Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio 40(7):719-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y
17. Forest, I., V. Calcagno, A. Hector, J. Connolly, W. S. Harpole, P. B. Reich, M. Scherer-Lorenzen, B. Schmid, D. Tilman, J. van Ruijven, A. Weitgelt, B. J. Wilsey, E. S. Zavaleta, and M. Loreau. 2011. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477:199-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10282
18. Gómez-Baggethun, E., R. de Groot, P. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2009. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69(6):1209-1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
19. Government of Victoria. 1987. Shaping Melbourne's future; the government's metropolitan policy. Government Printer, Melbourne.
20. Government of Victoria. 1992. A place to live: urban development 1992-2031 - shaping Victoria's future. Department of Planning and Housing, Melbourne.
21. Government of Victoria. 1995. Living suburbs: a policy for metropolitan Melbourne into the 21st Century. Government of Victoria, Melbourne.
22. Government of Victoria. 2002. Melbourne 2030: planning for sustainable development. Victorian Government, Melbourne.
23. Healey, P. 2006. Urban complexity and spatial strategies: towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, London, UK.
24. Kaplan, S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:169-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
25. Kosoy, N., and E. Corbera. 2009. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics 69:1228-1236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
26. Kremen, C., and R. Ostfeld. 2005. A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3(10):540-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO;2
27. Kroll, F., F. Müller, D. Haase, and N. Fohrer. 2005. Ruralurban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29:521-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008
28. Maas, J., R. Verheij, P. Groenewegen, S. de Vries, and P. Spreeuwenberg. 2006. Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 60:587-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125
29. Malthus, T. 1826. An essay on the principle of population -sixth edition. John Murray, London, UK.
30. Martinez-Arroyo, A., and E. Jáuregui. 2000. On the environmental role of urban lakes in Mexico city. Urban ecosystems 4:145-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011355110475
31. McGranahan, G., P. Marcotullio, X. M. Bai, D. Balk, T. Braga, I. Douglas, T. Elmqvist, W. Rees, D. Satterthwaite, J. Songsore, H. Zlotnick, J. Eades, E. Ezcurra, and A. Whyte. 2005. Urban systems. Pages 797-821 in R. Hassan, R. Scholes, and N. Ash, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series). Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
32. Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works (MMBW). 1954. Melbourne metropolitan planning scheme 1954: report. MMBW, Melbourne, Australia.
33. Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works (MMBW). 1971. Planning policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region. MMBW, Melbourne, Australia.
34. Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works (MMBW). 1980. Metropolitan strategy. MMBW, Melbourne, Australia.
35. Metropolitan Town Planning Commission. 1929. Plan of general development Melbourne: report of the Metropolitan Town Planning Commission. Government Printer, Melbourne, Australia.
36. Nelson, E., G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, R. Cameron, K. Chan, G. C. Daily, J. Goldstein, P. Kareiva, E. Lonsdorf, R. Naidoo, T. Ricketts, and R. Shaw. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1):4-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/080023
37. Niemelä, J., S. R. Saarela, T. Söderman, L. Kopperoinen, V. Yli-Pekkonen, S. Väre, and J. Kotze. 2010. Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodiversity Conservation 19:3225-3243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
38. Norgaard, R. 2010. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69 (6):1219-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009
39. Owens, S., and R. Cowell. 2002. Land and limits: interpreting sustainability in the planning process. Routledge, London, UK.
40. Peterson, M., D. Hall, A. Feldpausch-Parker, and T. Peterson. 2010. Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conservation Biology 24 (1):113-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01305.x
41. Presland, G. 2009. The place for a village: how nature has shaped the city of Melbourne. Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
42. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G. Peterson, and M. Bennet. 2010a. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107
43. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G. D. Peterson, M. Tengö, E. M. Bennett, T. Holland, K. Benessaiah, G. K. MacDonald, and L. Pfeifer. 2010b. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? BioScience 60:576-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4
44. Regionplane- och trafikkontoret (RTK). 2002. Regional Utvecklingsplan 2001 för Stockholmsregionen (RUFS 2001). Regionplane- och trafikkontoret, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Stockholm, Sweden.
45. Regionplane- och trafikkontoret (RTK). 2009. Regional Utvecklingsplan för Stockholmsregionen - Utställningsförslag RUFS 2010. Regionplanenämnden, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Stockholm, Sweden.
46. Robertson, M. 2004. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35(3):361-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002
47. Robertson, M. 2006. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24(3):367-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d3304
48. Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. S. Chapin, E. F. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C. A, de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P. K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R. W. Corell, V. J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J. A. Foley. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/461472a
49. Rydin, Y. 2010. Governing for sustainable urban development. Earthscan, London, UK.
50. Sandercock, L., and J. Friedmann. 2000. Strategising the metropolis in a global era. Urban Policy and Research 18 (4):529-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08111140008727855
51. Slocombe, D. S. 1993. Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development. Environmental Management 17(3):289-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02394672
52. Stockholmsförorternas regionplaneförbund. 1935. Regionplan för Stockholm med omnejd huvudsakligen avseende förortsområdet. Norrtelje Tidnings boktryckeri A.B, Norrtälje, Sweden.
53. Stockholms läns landsting - Regionplanenämnden. 1976. Regionplan 1973 för Stockholms län. Nämnden, Stockholm, Sweden.
54. Stockholms läns landsting - Regionplane- och näringslivsnämnden. 1982. Regionplan 1978 för kommunerna i Stockholms län. Nämnden, Stockholm, Sweden.
55. Stockholms läns landsting. 1991. Regionplan 1991 för Stockholms län 1990-2020. Regionplane- och trafikkontoret, Stockholms läns landsting, Stockholm, Sweden.
56. Stockholmstraktens regionplanenämnd. 1958. Förslag till regionplan för Stockholmstrakten. Seelig, Stockholm, Sweden.
57. Stockholmstraktens regionplanekontor. 1967. Skiss 66 till regionplan för Stockholmstrakten. Stockholmstraktens regionplanekontor, Stockholm, Sweden.
58. Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1996. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (second edition). Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calfornia, USA.
59. Sukhdev, P., H. Wittmer, C. Schröter-Schlaack, C. Nesshöver, J. Bishop, P. ten Brink, H. Gundimeda, P. Kumar, and B. Simmons. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Progress Press, Valletta, Malta. [online] URL: http://www.teebweb.org/publications/teeb-study-reports/synthesis/
60. Wilkinson, C. 2011. Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory 11(2):148-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095211426274
61. Wilson, E., and J. Piper. 2010. Spatial planning and climate change. Routledge, Milton Park, UK.
62. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.