Social identity threat motivates science- discrediting online comments

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Nauroth, Peter ^a   Gollwitzer, Mario ^a   Bender, Jens ^b   Rothmund, Tobias ^b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; ONLINE SYSTEM; PREDICTION; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL STATUS; THREAT; WEB BROWSER; ADOLESCENT; AGGRESSION; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; VIDEO GAME; VIOLENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; VIDEO GAMES; VIOLENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922361970     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117476     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Batts S, Anthis NJ, Smith T (2008) Advancing science through conversations: Bridging the gap between blogs and the academy. PLOS Biol 6: 1837-1841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060240
2. Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders RB (2010) Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J Commun 60: 413-439. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
3. Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA, Ladwig P (2014) The "nasty effect": Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J Comput Mediat Commun 19: 373-387. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12009
4. Bushman BJ (09 May 2011) Violent video games harm children. Available: http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=X3SA0YdK53g. Accessed 2014 Mar 31.
5. Lewandowsky S, Ecker U, Seifert C, Schwarz N, Cook J (2012) Misinformation and its correction, continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest 13: 106-131. doi: 10.1177/ 1529100612451018
6. Greitemeyer T (2014) I Am Right, You Are Wrong: How Biased Assimilation Increases the Perceived Gap between Believers and Skeptics of Violent Video Game Effects. PLOS ONE 9: e93440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093440 PMID: 24722467
7. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 37: 2098-2109. doi: 10.1037/ 0022-3514.37.11.2098
8. Munro GD (2010) The scientific impotence excuse: Discounting belief-threatening scientific abstracts. J Appl Soc Psychol 40: 579-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00588.x
9. Scheufele D, Corley E, Shih T, Dalrymple KE, Ho SS (2008) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 4: 91-94. doi: 10.1038/ nnano.2008.361 PMID: 19197309
10. Morton TA, Haslam SA, Postmes T, Ryan MK (2006) We value what values us: The appeal of identityaffirming science. Polit Psychol 27: 823-838. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00539.x
11. Nauroth P, Gollwitzer M, Bender J, Rothmund T (2014) Gamers against science: The case of the violent video games debate. Eur J Soc Psychol 44: 104-116. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1998
12. Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Postmes T (2007) Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women's leadership positions. J Organ Change Manag 20: 182-197. doi: 10.1108/09534810710724748
13. Glasman LR, Albarracin D (2006) Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychol Bull 132: 778-822. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778 PMID: 16910754
14. Tajfel H, Turner JJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worschel S, editors. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Vol. 33). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. pp. 33-47.
15. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG, editors. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall. pp. 7-24.
16. Reicher SD, Spears R, Postmes T (1995) A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In Stroebe W, Hewstone M, editors. European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6). Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 161-198. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000049
17. Van Zomeren M, Postmes T, Spears R (2008) Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychol Bull 134: 504-535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 PMID: 18605818
18. Turner J, Hogg M, Oakes P, Reicher S, Wetherell M (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. WoodW(2000) Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annu Rev Psychol 51: 539-570. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539 PMID: 10751980
20. Branscombe NR, Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B (1999) The context and content of social identity threat. In: Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B, editors. Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 35-58.
21. De Hoog (2013) Processing of social identity threats: A defense motivation perspective. Soc Psychol 44: 361-372. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000133
22. Scheepers D, Spears R, Doosje B, Manstead ASR (2003) Two functions of verbal intergroup discrimination: Identity and instrumental motives as a result of group identification and threat. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29: 568-577. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005002 PMID: 15272991
23. Spears R, Lea M, Postmes T (2007) Computer-mediated communication and social identity. In: Joinson A, McKenna K, Postmes T, Reips U, editors. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Postmes T, Spears R, Sakhel K, De Groot D (2001) Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27: 1243-1254. doi: 10.1177/ 01461672012710001
25. Postmes T (2007) The psychological dimensions of collective action, online. In: Joinson A, McKenna K, Postmes T, Reips U-D, editors. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 165-184.
26. Sherman DAK, Nelson LD, Steele CM (2000) Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self- affirmation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 26: 1046-1058. doi: 10.1177/01461672002611003
27. Steele CM (1988) The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 21). New York: Academic Press. pp. 261- 302
28. Sherman DK, Cohen GL (2006) The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 183-242. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5
29. Toma CT, Hancock JT (2013) Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 39: 321-331. doi: 10.1177/0146167212474694 PMID: 23359086
30. Glasford D, Dovidio J, Pratto F (2009) I continue to feel so good about us: In-group identification and the use of social identity-enhancing strategies to reduce intragroup dissonance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 35: 415-427. doi: 10.1177/0146167208329216 PMID: 19141621
31. Derks B, Van Laar C, Ellemers N (2006) Striving for success in outgroup settings: Effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32: 576-588. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283336 PMID: 16702152
32. Sherman DK, Kinias Z, Major B, Kim HS, Prenovost M (2007) The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33: 1100-1112. doi: 10.1177/0146167207303027 PMID: 17630262
33. Derks B, Van Laar C, Ellemers N (2009) Working for the self or working for the group: How self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 96: 183-202. doi: 10.1037/a0013068 PMID: 19210074
34. Bushman BJ, Huesmann LR (2013) Twenty-five years of research on violence in digital games and aggression revisited: A reply to Elson & Ferguson (2013) Eur Psychol 19: 47-55. doi: 10.1027/1016- 9040/a000164
35. Elson M, Ferguson CJ (2014) Twenty-five years of research on violence in digital games and aggression: Empirical evidence, perspectives, and a debate gone astray. Eur Psychol 19: 33-46. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000147.
36. Pollard Sacks D, Bushman BJ, Anderson CA (2011) Do violent video games harm children? Comparing the scientific amicus curiae "experts" in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association. Northwestern University Law Review: Colloquy 106: 1-12. Available: http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/ colloquy/2011/15/LRColl2011n15PollardSacks.pdf.
37. Przybylski AK (2014) Who believes electronic games cause real-world aggression? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 17: 228-234. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0245 PMID: 24256132
38. Sjöström A, Sowka A, Gollwitzer M, Klimmt C, Rothmund T (2013) Exploring audience judgments of social science in media discourse: The case of the violent video games debate. Journal of Media Psychology 25: 27-38. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000077
39. Leach CW, Van Zomeren M, Zebel S, Vliek MLW, Pennekamp SF, et al. (2008) Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. J Pers Soc Psychol 95: 144-165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 PMID: 18605857
40. Mael FA, Tetrick LE (1992) Identifying organizational identification. Educ Psychol Meas 52: 813-824. doi: 10.1177/0013164492052004002
41. Ashmore RD, Deaux K, McLaughlin-Volpe T (2004) An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychol Bull 130: 80-114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909. 130.1.80 PMID: 14717651
42. Cohen J, Cohen P, West S, Aiken L (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences ( 3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. PMID: 25057689
43. Aiken L, West S (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Schwarz N (1999) Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54: 93-105. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
45. Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspect Psychol Sci 7: 203-220. doi: 10.1177/1745691612442904
46. Postmes T, Haslam SA, Jans L (2013) A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. Br J Soc Psychol 52: 597-617. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12006 PMID: 23121468
47. FrühW(2007) Inhaltsanalyse: Theorie und Praxis ( 6st ed). Konstanz: UVK.
48. Hayes AF, Krippendorff K (2007) Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas 1: 77-89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
49. Krippendorff K (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Hum Commun Res 30: 411-433. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
50. Steiger JH (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 87: 245-251. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
51. Kelley K (2007) Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: Theory, application, and implementation. Journal of Statistical Software 20(8): 1-24. Available: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i08/.
52. Blascovich J, Tomaka J (1996) The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 1-51.
53. Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol Behav 7: 321-326. doi: 10.1089/ 1094931041291295 PMID: 15257832
54. Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive- scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 8788-8790. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1320040111 PMID: 24889601
55. Pfeffer J, Zorbach T, Carley KM (2014) Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. J Market Comm 20: 117-128. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2013.797778
56. Klein O, Spears R, Reicher S (2007) Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of the SIDE model. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 11: 28-45. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294588 PMID: 18453454
57. Van Laer J, Van Aelst P (2010) Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society 13: 1146-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.12.003 PMID: 25562877
58. Schuman S (2014) Click to Act? The (De)Mobilizing Effect of Expressive Low-threshold Online Collective Actions: Motivational Underpinnings and Contextual Boundaries. Doctoral Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
59. Brunstig S, Postmes T (2002) Social movement participation in the Digital Age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Res 33: 525-554. doi: 10.1177/104649602237169
60. Abrams D, Hogg MA (1999) Social identity and social cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell. PMID: 25506965
61. Walther JB, DeAndrea D, Kim J, Anthony JC (2010) The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Hum Commun Res 36: 469-492. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
62. Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor JT (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341: 647-651. doi: 10.1126/science.1240466 PMID: 23929980
63. Jackson JW (2011) Intragroup cooperation as a function of group performance and group identity. Group Dyn 15: 343-356. doi: 10.1037/a0024575
64. Houston JB, Hansen GJ, Nisbett GS (2013) Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. ENews 7: 79-92. doi: 10.1177/1931243111407618
65. Huesmann LR, Taylor LD (2003) The case against the case against media violence. In: Gentile D, editor. Media Violence and Children. Westport: CT: Greenwood Press. pp. 107-130
66. Edwards C, Edwards A, Qing Q, Wahl ST (2007) The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Commun Educ 56: 255-277. doi: 10.1080/03634520701236866
67. Walther JB, Van Der Heide B, Hamel LM, Shulman HC (2009) Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communic Res 36: 229-253. doi: 10.1177/0093650208330251