Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action

Small Group Research

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 525-554

  Brunsting, Suzanne ^a   Postmes, Tom ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036374605     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649602237169     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for alow-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5. Bernstein, M., & Crosby, F. J. (1980). An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-184.
6. Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 159-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3), 371-389.
8. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617-626.
9. Grant, P. R., & Brown, R. (1995). From ethnocentrism to collective protest: responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 195-212.
10. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
12. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Tansik, D. A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21, 333-348.
14. Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. (1995). Social identity and affect as determinants of collective action: Toward an integration of relative deprivation and social identity theories. Theory and Psychology, 5, 551-577.
15. Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, inter-group perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59-83.
16. Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5(1), 41-57.
17. Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis.
18. Kelly, C., & Kelly, J. (1994). Who gets involved in collective action? Social psychological determinants of individual participation in trade unions. Human Relations, 47(1), 63-87.
19. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
20. Klandermans, B. (1992). The social construction of protest and multiorganization fields. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 77-103). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519-531.
22. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23. Klandermans, P. G. (1984). Mobilization and participation in trade union action: An expectancy-value approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 107-120.
24. Klandermans, P. G. (1985). Mobilisatie en participatie in een sociale beweging [Mobilization and participation in a social movement]. In O. Schreuder (Ed.), Moderne bewegingen. Oude thema's in een nieuw klimaat (pp. 57-78). Zeist, the Netherlands: Kerckebosch.
25. Klandermans, P. G. (1986). Psychology and trade union participation: Joining, acting and quitting. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 159-204.
26. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 34(2), 283-301.
27. Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526-537.
28. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-245.
29. Oliver, P. ( 1984). "If you don't do it, nobody else will": Active and token contributors to local collective action. American Sociological Review, 49(1), 601-610.
30. Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of Internet: Mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 290-301.
31. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.
32. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.
33. Reicher, S. (1982). The determination of collective behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and inter-group relations (pp. 41-83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
35. Reicher, S. (1996). "The crowd" century: Reconciling practical success with theoretical failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 535-553.
36. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161-198). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
37. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38. Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology.
39. Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stuermer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., et al. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646-658.
40. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
41. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
42. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). The power of influence and the influence of power in virtual groups: A SIDE look at CMC and the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 91-108.
43. Steinheider, B., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Hust, I., Prinz, L., Vogelgesang, F., & Hormuth, S. E. (1999). Soziale Normen als Prädiktoren von umweltbezogenem Verhalten [Social norms as predictors of environmental behavior]. Zeitschrift Fur Sozialpsychologie, 50(1), 40-56.
44. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
45. Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301-310.
46. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994-1003.