CCharPPI web server: Computational characterization of protein-protein interactions from structure

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 123-125

  Moaly, Iain H ^a   Jiménez Garcíay, Brian ^a   Fernández Recio, Juan ^a  

^a BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX;

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; HYDROGEN BOND; INTERNET; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

HUMANS; HYDROGEN BONDING; INTERNET; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SOFTWARE; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 84922358236     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu594     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agius,R. et al. (2013) Characterizing changes in the rate of protein-protein dissociation upon interface mutation using hotspot energy and organization. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003216.
2. Andrusier,N. et al. (2007) FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins, 69, 139-159.
3. Chaudhury,S. et al. (2010) PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta. Bioinformatics, 26, 689-691.
4. Cheng,T.M. et al. (2007) pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins, 68, 503-515.
5. Chothia,C. and Janin,J. (1975) Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature, 256, 705-708.
6. Chuang,G.Y. et al. (2008) DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking. Biophys. J., 95, 4217-4227.
7. Feliu,E. et al. (2011) On the analysis of protein-protein interactions via knowledgebased potentials for the prediction of protein-protein docking. Protein Sci., 20, 529-541.
8. Feng,Y. et al. (2010) Potentials'R' Us web-server for protein energy estimations with coarse-grained knowledge-based potentials. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 92.
9. Fleishman,S.J. et al. (2011) Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology. J. Mol. Biol., 414, 289-302.
10. Guerois,R. et al. (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol., 320, 369-387.
11. Jones,S. and Thornton,J.M. (1997) Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. Mol. Biol., 272, 121-132.
12. Kastritis,P. et al. (2011) A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity. Protein Sci., 20, 482-491.
13. Lise,S. et al. (2009) Prediction of hot spot residues at protein-protein interfaces by combining machine learning and energy-based methods. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 365.
14. Liu,S. and Vakser,I.A. (2011) DECK: Distance and environment-dependent, coarse-grained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 280.
15. Liu,S. et al. (2004) A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins, 56, 93-101.
16. Lu,H. et al. (2003) Development of unified statistical potentials describing proteinprotein interactions. Biophys. J., 84, 1895-1901.
17. Lu,M. et al. (2008) OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. J. Mol. Biol., 376, 288-301.
18. Mintseris,J. et al. (2007) Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins, 69, 511-520.
19. Mitra,P. and Pal,D. (2010) New measures for estimating surface complementarity and packing at protein-protein interfaces. FEBS Lett., 584, 1163-1168.
20. Moal,I.H. and Bates,P.A. (2012) Kinetic rate constant prediction supports the conformational selection mechanism of protein binding. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, e1002351.
21. Moal,I.H. and Fernandez-Recio,J. (2012) SKEMPI: a Structural kinetic and energetic database of mutant protein interactions and its use in empirical models. Bioinformatics, 28, 2600-2607.
22. Moal,I.H. and Fernandez-Recio,J. (2013) Intermolecular contact potentials for protein- protein interactions extracted from binding free energy changes upon mutation. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 3715-3727.
23. Moal,I.H. et al. (2011) Protein-protein binding affinity prediction on a diverse set of structures. Bioinformatics, 27, 3002-3009.
24. Moal,I.H. et al. (2013a) Scoring functions for protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 23, 862-867.
25. Moal,I.H. et al. (2013b) The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions. BMC Bioinformatics, 14, 286.
26. Moretti,R. et al. (2013) Community-wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein interactions. Proteins, 81, 1980-1987.
27. Pallara,C. et al. (2013) Expanding the frontiers of protein-protein modeling: from docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges. Proteins, 81, 2192-2200.
28. Pierce,B. and Weng,Z. (2007) ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins, 67, 1078-1086.
29. Pierce,B. and Weng,Z. (2008) A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance. Proteins, 72, 270-279.
30. Pokarowski,P. et al. (2005) Inferring ideal amino acid interaction forms from statistical protein contact potentials. Proteins, 59, 49-57.
31. Pons,C. et al. (2011) Scoring by intermolecular pairwise propensities of exposed residues (SIPPER): a new efficient potential for protein-protein docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 51, 370-377.
32. Rajgaria,R. et al. (2006) A novel high resolution Calpha-Calpha distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set. Proteins, 65, 726-741.
33. Rajgaria,R. et al. (2008) Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys. Proteins, 70, 950-970.
34. Ravikant,D.V. and Elber,R. (2010) PIE-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking. Proteins, 78, 400-419.
35. Shen,M.Y. and Sali,A. (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci., 15, 2507-2524.
36. Tobi,D. (2010) Designing coarse grained-and atom based-potentials for proteinprotein docking. BMC Struct. Biol., 10, 40.
37. Tobi,D. and Bahar,I. (2006) Optimal design of protein docking potentials: efficiency and limitations. Proteins, 62, 970-981.
38. Tuncbag,N. et al. (2009) A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Brief. Bioinformatics, 10, 217-232.
39. Viswanath,S. et al. (2013) Improving ranking of models for protein complexes with side chain modeling and atomic potentials. Proteins, 81, 592-606.
40. Yang,Y. and Zhou,Y. (2008a) Ab initio folding of terminal segments with secondary structures reveals the fine difference between two closely related all-atom statistical energy functions. Protein Sci., 17, 1212-1219.
41. Yang,Y. and Zhou,Y. (2008b) Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins, 72, 793-803.
42. Yu,C.M. et al. (2012) Rationalization and design of the complementarity determining region sequences in an antibody-antigen recognition interface. PLoS One, 7, e33340.
43. Zhang,J. and Zhang,Y. (2010) A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction. PLoS One, 5, e15386.
44. Zhou,H. and Skolnick,J. (2011) GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, allatom statistical potential for protein structure prediction. Biophys. J., 101, 2043-2052.
45. Zhu,X. and Mitchell,J.C. (2011) KFC2: a knowledge-based hot spot prediction method based on interface solvation, atomic density, and plasticity features. Proteins, 79, 2671-2683.