Finding Our Way through Phenotypes

PLoS Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Deans, Andrew R ^a   Lewis, Suzanna E ^b   Huala, Eva ^c,d   Anzaldo, Salvatore S ^e   Ashburner, Michael ^f   Balhoff, James P ^g   Blackburn, David C ^h   Blake, Judith A ⁱ   Burleigh, J Gordon ^j   Chanet, Bruno ^k   Cooper, Laurel D ^l   Courtot, Mélanie ^m   Csösz, Sándor ⁿ   Cui, Hong ^o   Dahdul, Wasila ^p   Das, Sandip ^q   Dececchi, T Alexander ^p   Dettai, Agnes ^k   Diogo, Rui ^r   Druzinsky, Robert E ^s   Dumontier, Michel ^t   Franz, Nico M ^e   Friedrich, Frank ^u   Gkoutos, George V ^v   Haendel, Melissa ^w   Harmon, Luke J ^x   Hayamizu, Terry F ⁱ   He, Yongqun ^y   Hines, Heather M ^a   Ibrahim, Nizar ^z   Jackson, Laura M ^p   Jaiswal, Pankaj ^l   James Zorn, Christina ^aa   Köhler, Sebastian ^ab   Lecointre, Guillaume ^k   Lapp, Hilmar ^g   Lawrence, Carolyn J ^ac   Le Novère, Nicolas ^ad   Lundberg, John G ^ae   Macklin, James ^af   Mast, Austin R ^ag   Midford, Peter E ^ah   Mikó, István ^a   Mungall, Christopher J ^b   Oellrich, Anika ^ai   Osumi Sutherland, David ^ai   Parkinson, Helen ^ai   Ramírez, Martín J ^aj   Richter, Stefan ^ak   Robinson, Peter N ^ab   Ruttenberg, Alan ^al   Schulz, Katja S ^am   Segerdell, Erik ^w   Seltmann, Katja C ^an   Sharkey, Michael J ^ao   Smith, Aaron D ^ap   Smith, Barry ^al   Specht, Chelsea D ^aq   Squires, R Burke ^ar   Thacker, Robert W ^as   Thessen, Anne ^at   Fernandez Triana, Jose ^au   Vihinen, Mauno ^av   Vize, Peter D ^aw   Vogt, Lars ^ax   Wall, Christine E ^ay   Walls, Ramona L ^o   Westerfeld, Monte ^az   Wharton, Robert A ^ba   Wirkner, Christian S ^ak   Woolley, James B ^ba   Yoder, Matthew J ^bb   Zorn, Aaron M ^aa   Mabee, Paula ^p   more..

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d Phoenix Bioinformatics   (United States)

^e ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^g NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

^h CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

ⁱ JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^k MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^l OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁿ INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^o UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^p W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^r HOWARD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^t STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^v ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^w OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^x UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^y UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^z UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^aa CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^ab CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^ac IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ad BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^ae ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^af OTTAWA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

^ag FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ah Department of Biological Science Florida State University ^*  (United States)

^ai EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^aj MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

^ak UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^al UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^am DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^an DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^ao UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^ap NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^aq UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^ar NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^as UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^at The Data Detektiv   (United States)

^au Arachnids and Nematodes   (Canada)

^av LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^aw UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^ax UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^ay DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^az UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^ba TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^bb UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEREDITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ONTOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PHYLOGENY; SEMANTICS; TAXONOMY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NOMENCLATURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STANDARDS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA CURATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOMICS; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84922211548     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002033     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Burleigh JG, Alphonse K, Alverson AJ, Bik HM, Blank C, et al. (2013) Next-generation phenomics for the Tree of Life. PLoS Currents 5.
2. Pogodin S, Hasan J, Baulin VA, Webb HK, Truong VK, et al. (2013) Biophysical model of bacterial cell interactions with nanopatterned cicada wing surfaces. Biophys J 104: 835–840.
3. Ma KY, Chirarattananon P, Fuller SB, Wood RJ, (2013) Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science 340: 603–607.
4. Aboelkassem Y, Staples AE, (2013) Selective pumping in a network: insect-style microscale flow transport. Bioinspir Biomim 8: 026004.
5. Salmon AB, Leonard S, Masamsetti V, Pierce A, Podlutsky AJ, et al. (2009) The long lifespan of two bat species is correlated with resistance to protein oxidation and enhanced protein homeostasis. FASEB J 23: 2317–2326.
6. National Plant Genome Initiative: 2009–2013. http://www.nsf.gov/bio/pubs/reports/npgi_five_year_plan_2009_2013.pdf. 26 June 2014.
7. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. 26 June 2014.
8. European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) databases. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/services. 26 June 2014.
9. DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ). http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/. 26 June 2014.
10. Ensembl Plants. http://plants.ensembl.org. 26 June 2014.
11. Phytozome. http://www.phytozome.net.26June2014.
12. European Nurserystock Association (ENA). http://www.enaplants.eu/.26June2014.
13. GigaDB. http://gigadb.org. 26 June 2014.
14. NSF (2011) Phenomics: Genotype to Phenotype. A report of the Phenomics workshop sponsored by the USDA and NSF 2011 National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/bio/pubs/reports/phenomics_workshop_report.pdf
15. Houle D, Govindaraju DR, Omholt S, (2010) Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet 11: 855–866.
16. Houle D, (2010) Colloquium papers: Numbering the hairs on our heads: the shared challenge and promise of phenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 Suppl 11793–1799.
17. Trelease RB, (2006) Anatomical reasoning in the informatics age: Principles, ontologies, and agendas. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist 289B: 72–84.
18. Zamir D, (2013) Where have all the crop phenotypes gone? PLoS Biol 11: e1001595.
19. Phenotype Research Coordination Network (Phenotype RCN). http://www.phenotypercn.org. 26 June 2014.
20. Phenoscape Knowledgebase. kb.phenoscape.org. 12 Aug 2014.
21. Mabee P, Balhoff JP, Dahdul WM, Lapp H, Midford PE, et al. (2012) 500,000 fish phenotypes: The new informatics landscape for evolutionary and developmental biology of the vertebrate skeleton. J Appl Ichthyol 28: 300–305.
22. Dahdul WM, Balhoff JP, Engeman J, Grande T, Hilton EJ, et al. (2010) Evolutionary characters, phenotypes and ontologies: curating data from the systematic biology literature. PLoS One 5: e10708.
23. Balhoff JP, Dahdul WM, Kothari CR, Lapp H, Lundberg JG, et al. (2010) Phenex: ontological annotation of phenotypic diversity. PLoS One 5: e10500.
24. Deans AR, Yoder MJ, Balhoff JP, (2012) Time to change how we describe biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 78–84.
25. Franz NM, Thau D, (2010) Biological taxonomy and ontology development: scope and limitations. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 45–66.
26. Ramírez MJ, Michalik P (2014) Calculating structural complexity in phylogenies using ancestral ontologies. Cladistics. doi: 10.1111/cla.12075.
27. Richter S, Wirkner CS, (2014) A research program for Evolutionary Morphology. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 52: 338–350.
28. Wirkner C, Richter S, (2010) Evolutionary morphology of the circulatory system in Peracarida (Malacostraca; Crustacea). Cladistics 26: 143–167.
29. Yoder MJ, Miko I, Seltmann KC, Bertone MA, Deans AR, (2010) A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PLoS One 5: e15991.
30. Balhoff JP, Mikó I, Yoder MJ, Mullins PL, Deans AR, (2013) A semantic model for species description, applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia. Syst Biol 62: 639–659.
31. Mikó I, Copeland R, Balhoff J, Yoder M, Deans A, (2014) Folding wings like a cockroach: a review of transverse wing folding ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae: Afrevania and Trissevania). PLoS ONE 9: e94056.
32. Washington NL, Haendel Ma, Mungall CJ, Ashburner M, Westerfield M, et al. (2009) Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation. PLoS Biol 7: e1000247.
33. Monarch Initiative. [http://monarch.monarchinitiative.org] 11 Aug 2014.
34. Youens-Clark K, Buckler E, Casstevens T, Chen C, Declerck G, et al. (2011) Gramene database in 2010: updates and extensions. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D1085–1094.
35. Ni J, Pujar A, Youens-Clark K, Yap I, Jaiswal P, et al. (2009) Gramene QTL database: development, content and applications. Database (Oxford) 2009: bap005.
36. Arighi CN, Carterette B, Cohen KB, Krallinger M, Wilbur WJ, et al. (2013) An overview of the BioCreative 2012 Workshop Track III: interactive text mining task. Database (Oxford) 2013: bas056.
37. Cui H, (2012) CharaParser for fine-grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology 63: 738–754.
38. Thessen AE, Parr CS, (2014) Knowledge extraction and semantic annotation of text from the encyclopedia of life. PLoS One 9: e89550.
39. Markov G, Lecointre G, Demeneix B, Laudet V, (2008) The “street light syndrome”. or how protein taxonomy can bias experimental manipulations. Bioessays 30: 349–357.
40. NRC (National Research Council) U (2010) Research at the Intersection of the Physical and Life Sciences: Grand Challenges. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US)
41. Genomes - Phenomes Grand Challenge. 26 June 2014. https://extwiki.nsf.gov/display/gpgc/Genomes+-+Phenomes+Grand+Challenge+Home
42. Sansone SA, Rocca-Serra P, Field D, Maguire E, Taylor C, et al. (2012) Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet 44: 121–126.
43. Cost per Genome. http://www.genome.gov/images/content/cost_per_genome.jpg. 26 June 2014.
44. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, et al. (2014) ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D980–985.
45. MedGen. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/medgen. 26 June 2014.
46. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/26 June 2014.
47. Robinson PN, Mundlos S, (2010) The Human Phenotype Ontology. Clin Genet 77: 525–534.
48. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Undiagnosed Disease Program. http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/research/pages/27/undiagnosed-diseases-program 26 June 2014.
49. The database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap 26 June 2014.
50. PhenomeCentral. https://phenomecentral.org. 26 June 2014.
51. Dugan VG, Emrich SJ, Giraldo-Calderon GI, Harb OS, Newman RM, et al. (2014) Standardized metadata for human pathogen/vector genomic sequences. PLoS One 9: e99979.
52. Knockout Mouse Phenotyping Project (KOMP2) http://jaxmice.jax.org/news/2013/KOMP_article_3.html 26 June 2014.
53. International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) http://www.mousephenotype.org. 26 June 2014.
54. Smith CL, Eppig JT, (2009) The mammalian phenotype ontology: enabling robust annotation and comparative analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 1: 390–399.
55. Mungall CJ, Torniai C, Gkoutos GV, Lewis SE, Haendel MA, (2012) Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biology 13: R5.
56. Haendel MA, Ballhoff JP, Bastian FB, Blackburn DC, Blake JA, et al. (2014) Uberon: Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology. J Biomed Semantics 5: 21.
57. Hoehndorf R, Schofield PN, Gkoutos GV, (2011) PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e119.
58. Köhler S, Doelken SC, Ruef BJ, Bauer S, Washington N, et al. (2013) Construction and accessibility of a cross-species phenotype ontology along with gene annotations for biomedical research. F1000Res 2: 30.
59. Monarch Initiative. http://monarchinitiative.org/26 June 2014.
60. Buttigieg PL, Morrison N, Smith B, Mungall CJ, Lewis SE, et al. (2013) The environment ontology: contextualising biological and biomedical entities. J Biomed Semantics 4: 43.
61. Mattingly CJ, McKone TE, Callahan MA, Blake JA, Hubal EA, (2012) Providing the missing link: the exposure science ontology ExO. Environ Sci Technol 46: 3046–3053.
62. Encyclopedia of Life. http://eol.org/26 June 2014.
63. International Census of Marine Microbes http://icomm.mbl.edu/26 June 2014.
64. Parkinson H, Kapushesky M, Kolesnikov N, Rustici G, Shojatalab M, et al. (2009) ArrayExpress update—from an archive of functional genomics experiments to the atlas of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D868–872.
65. National Human Genome Research Institute's catalog of published Genome-Wide Association Studies http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies/26 June 2014.
66. Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, et al. (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342: 850–853.
67. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). http://www.neoninc.org/31 October 2014.
68. Phenotype RCN: Environment and Phenotype meeting. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/homePage/slideshow/september_15_2014_workshop_of_the_development_of_a_framework_for_environmental_health_science_language_508.pdf http://www.phenotypercn.org/?page_id=2287. 15 October 2014.
69. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: Workshop for the Development of a Framework for Environmental Health Science Language. https://http://www.niehs.nih.gov/homePage/slideshow september_15_2014_workshop_of_the_development_of_a_framework_for_environmental_health_science_language_508.pdf. 19 October 2014.
70. Vogt L, Nickel M, Jenner RA, Deans AR, (2013) The need for data standards in zoomorphology. J Morphol 274: 793–808.
71. Piwowar HA, Vision TJ, Whitlock MC, (2011) Data archiving is a good investment. Nature 473: 285.
72. Hiller M, Schaar BT, Indjeian VB, Kingsley DM, Hagey LR, et al. (2012) A “forward genomics” approach links genotype to phenotype using independent phenotypic losses among related species. Cell Reports 2: 817–823.
73. Rowan Ba, Weigel D, Koenig D, (2011) Developmental genetics and new sequencing technologies: the rise of nonmodel organisms. Dev Cell 21: 65–76.
74. Aristotle, Balme DM, Gotthelf A (2002) Aristotle: ‘Historia Animalium’: Volume 1, Books I-X: Text: Cambridge University Press.
75. von Baer KE (1828) Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. Königsberg: Bornträger
76. Owen R (1849) On the Nature of Limbs: A Discourse. In: Amundson R, editor. On the Nature of Limbs: A Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
78. Ramírez M, Coddington J, Maddison W, Midford P, Prendini L, et al. (2007) Linking of digital images to phylogenetic data matrices using a morphological ontology. Syst Biol 56: 283–294.
79. Lloyd J, Meinke D, (2012) A comprehensive dataset of genes with a loss-of-function mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 158: 1115–1129.
80. Schnable JC, Freeling M, (2011) Genes identified by visible mutant phenotypes show increased bias toward one of two subgenomes of maize. PLoS One 6: e17855.
81. Dryad Digital Repository. http://datadryad.org/. 26 June 2014.
82. Ephesis: Environment and Phenotype Information System. https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Projects/URGI-softwares/Ephesis. 26 June 2014.
83. Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL). http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org. 26 June 2014.
84. Plant Trait Database. http://www.try-db.org/. 26 June 2014.
85. Morphbank:: Biological Imaging Florida State University, Department of Scientific Computing, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4026 USA. http://www.morphbank.net/. 26 June 2014.
86. O'Leary MA, Kaufman S, (2011) MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics 27: 529–537.
87. Morph.D.Base 2.0: A public data base for morphological data, metadata, and phylogenetic matrices. http://www.morphdbase.de. 26 June 2014.
88. Berquist RM, Gledhill KM, Peterson MW, Doan AH, Baxter GT, et al. (2012) The Digital Fish Library: using MRI to digitize, database, and document the morphological diversity of fish. PLoS One 7: e34499.
89. DigiMorph: Digital Morphology at the University of Texas at Austin. http://www.digimorph.org. 26 June 2014.
90. Australian Phenomics Facility. http://apf.anu.edu.au. 26 June 2014.
91. Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio). http://www.idigbio.org/. 27 June 2014.
92. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) http://www.neoninc.org. 20 October 2014.
93. Greene CH, Block BA, Welch D, Jackson G, Lawson GL (2009) Advances in conservation oceanography: new tagging and tracking technologies and their potential for transforming the science underlying fisheries management. Oceanography 22 210–223.
94. Oellrich A, Hoehndorf R, Gkoutos GV, Rebholz-Schuhmann D, (2012) Improving disease gene prioritization by comparing the semantic similarity of phenotypes in mice with those of human diseases. PloS One 7: e38937.
95. Köhler S, Doelken SC, Mungall CJ, Bauer S, Firth HV, et al. (2014) The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D966–974.
96. Haendel MA, Neuhaus F, Osumi-Sutherland DS, Mabee PM, Mejino JLV, et al. (2008) CARO – The Common Anatomy Reference Ontology. In: Burger A, Davidson D, Baldock R, editors. Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics: Principles and Practice. Springer. pp. 327–349.
97. The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI). http://obi-ontology.org/. 26 June 2014.
98. Brinkman RR, Courtot M, Derom D, Fostel JM, He Y, et al. (2010) Modeling biomedical experimental processes with OBI. J Biomed Semantics 1 Suppl 1S7.
99. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, et al. (2007) The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1251–1255.
100. Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative. http://oaei.ontologymatching.org. 26 June 2014.
101. Hamilton CM, Strader LC, Pratt JG, Maiese D, Hendershot T, et al. (2011) The PhenX Toolkit: get the most from your measures. Am J Epidemiol 174: 253–260.
102. Web Ontology Language (OWL) http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/26 June 2014.
103. Ruttenberg A, Clark T, Bug W, Samwald M, Bodenreider O, et al. (2007) Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web. BMC Bioinformatics 8 Suppl 3S2.
104. Ruttenberg A, Rees JA, Samwald M, Marshall MS, (2009) Life sciences on the Semantic Web: the Neurocommons and beyond. Brief Bioinform 10: 193–204.
105. OBO Foundry Identifier Policy. http://www.obofoundry.org/id-policy.shtml. 26 June 2014.
106. Gkoutos GV, Green EC, Mallon AM, Hancock JM, Davidson D, (2005) Using ontologies to describe mouse phenotypes. Genome Biol 6: R8.
107. Chen CK, Mungall CJ, Gkoutos GV, Doelken SC, Kohler S, et al. (2012) MouseFinder: Candidate disease genes from mouse phenotype data. Hum Mutat 33: 858–866.
108. Smedley D, Oellrich A, Kohler S, Ruef B, Sanger Mouse Genetics P, et al. (2013) PhenoDigm: analyzing curated annotations to associate animal models with human diseases. Database (Oxford) 2013: bat025.
109. Gkoutos GV, Mungall C, Dolken S, Ashburner M, Lewis S, et al. (2009) Entity/quality-based logical definitions for the human skeletal phenome using PATO. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009: 7069–7072.
110. McGary KL, Park TJ, Woods JO, Cha HJ, Wallingford JB, et al. (2010) Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 6544–6549.
111. Robinson PN, Webber C, (2014) Phenotype Ontologies and Cross-Species Analysis for Translational Research. PLoS Genet 10: e1004268.
112. Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet 42: 961–967.
113. Cook JP, McMullen MD, Holland JB, Tian F, Bradbury P, et al. (2012) Genetic architecture of maize kernel composition in the nested association mapping and inbred association panels. Plant Physiol 158: 824–834.
114. Wall CE, Vinyard CJ, Williams SH, Gapeyev V, Liu X, et al. (2011) Overview of FEED, the feeding experiments end-user database. Integr Comp Biol 51: 215–223.
115. Robinson PN, Köhler S, Oellrich A, (2014) Project SMG, Wang K, et al (2014) Improved exome prioritization of disease genes through cross-species phenotype comparison. Genome Res 24: 340–348.
116. Robinson PN, Köhler S, Bauer S, Seelow D, Horn D, et al. (2008) The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. Am J Hum Genet 83: 610–615.
117. Zemojtel T, Kohler S, Mackenroth L, Jager M, Hecht J, et al. (2014) Effective diagnosis of genetic disease by computational phenotype analysis of the disease-associated genome. Sci Transl Med 6: 252ra123.
118. Cooper L, Walls RL, Elser J, Gandolfo MA, Stevenson DW, et al. (2013) The plant ontology as a tool for comparative plant anatomy and genomic analyses. Plant Cell Physiol 54: e1.
119. Hung RJ, Yazdani U, Yoon J, Wu H, Yang T, et al. (2010) Mical links semaphorins to F-actin disassembly. Nature 463: 823–827.
120. Alvarez Y, Astudillo O, Jensen L, Reynolds AL, Waghorne N, et al. (2009) Selective inhibition of retinal angiogenesis by targeting PI3 kinase. PLoS One 4: e7867.
121. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA, (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646–674.
122. Yazdani U, Terman JR, (2006) The semaphorins. Genome Biol 7: 211.
123. Gu C, Giraudo E, (2013) The role of semaphorins and their receptors in vascular development and cancer. Exp Cell Res 319: 1306–1316.
124. Zygmunt T, Gay CM, Blondelle J, Singh MK, Flaherty KM, et al. (2011) Semaphorin-PlexinD1 signaling limits angiogenic potential via the VEGF decoy receptor sFlt1. Dev Cell 21: 301–314.
125. Torres-Vazquez J, Gitler AD, Fraser SD, Berk JD, Van NP, et al. (2004) Semaphorin-plexin signaling guides patterning of the developing vasculature. Dev Cell 7: 117–123.
126. Chung L, Yang TL, Huang HR, Hsu SM, Cheng HJ, et al. (2007) Semaphorin signaling facilitates cleft formation in the developing salivary gland. Development 134: 2935–2945.
127. Korostylev A, Worzfeld T, Deng S, Friedel RH, Swiercz JM, et al. (2008) A functional role for semaphorin 4D/plexin B1 interactions in epithelial branching morphogenesis during organogenesis. Development 135: 3333–3343.
128. Niinemets U, (2010) A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res 25: 693–714.
129. Serna L, Martin C, (2006) Trichomes: different regulatory networks lead to convergent structures. Trends Plant Sci 11: 274–280.
130. Rosinski JA, Atchley WR, (1998) Molecular evolution of the Myb family of transcription factors: evidence for polyphyletic origin. J Mol Evol 46: 74–83.