The mammalian phenotype ontology: Enabling robust annotation and comparative analysis

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 390-399

  Smith, Cynthia L ^a   Eppig, Janan T ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MUS; RATTUS;

ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA MINING; DISEASE MODEL; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MAMMAL; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; DATA MINING; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MAMMALS; MICE; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 78249235739     PISSN: 19395094     EISSN: 1939005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.44     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cordes SP. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis: boarding the mouse mutant express. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2005, 69(3):426-439.
2. Goldowitz D, Frankel WN, Takahashi JS, Holtz-Vitaterna M, Bult C, et al. Large-scale mutagenesis of the mouse to understand the genetic bases of nervous system structure and function. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2004, 132(2):105-115.
3. Hrabé deAngelisM, BallingR. Large scale ENU screens in themouse: genetics meets genomics. Mutat Res 1998, 400(1-2):25-32.
4. Nadeau JH, Balling R, Barsh G, Beier D, Brown SD, et al. International Mouse Mutagenesis Consortium: Sequence interpretation. Functional annotation of mouse genome sequences. Science 2001, 291(5507):1251-1255.
5. Austin CP, Battey JF, Bradley A, Bucan M, Capecchi M, et al. The knockout mouse project. Nat Genet 2004, 36(9):921-924.
6. Auwerx J, Avner P, Baldock R, Ballabio A, Balling R, et al. The European dimension for the mouse genome mutagenesis program. Nat Genet 2004, 36(9):925-927.
7. Collins FS, Finnell RH, Rossant J, Wurst W. A new partner for the international knockout mouse consortium. Cell 2007, 129(2):235.
8. Collins FS, Rossant J, Wurst W, International Mouse Knockout Consortium. A mouse for all reasons. Cell 2007, 128(1):9-13.
9. Blake JA, Harris MA. The Gene Ontology (GO) project: structured vocabularies for molecular biology and their application to genome and expression analysis. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2008, 23:7.2:1:7.2.9.
10. Hayamizu TF, Mangan M, Corradi JP, Kadin JA, Ringwald M.The AdultMouse Anatomical Dictionary: a tool for annotating and integrating data. Genome Biol 2005, 6(3):R29.
11. Bard J, Rhee SY, Ashburner M. An ontology for cell types. Genome Biol 2005, 6(2):R21.
12. Bard JB, Rhee SY. Ontologies in biology: design, applications and future challenges. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(3):213-222.
13. Smith CL, Goldsmith CA, Eppig JT. The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a tool for annotating, analyzing and comparing phenotypic information. Genome Biol 2005, 6(1):R7.
14. Day-Richter J, Harris MA, Haendel M, Gene Ontology OBO-Edit Working Group, Lewis S. OBO-Edit-an ontology editor for biologists. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(16):2198-2200.
15. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, et al., OBI Consortium. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25(11):1251-1255.
16. Gkoutos GV, Green EC, Mallon AM, Hancock JM, Davidson D. Using ontologies to describe mouse phenotypes. Genome Biol 2005, 6(1):R8.
17. Gkoutos GV, Green EC, Mallon AM, Blake A, Greenaway S, et al. Ontologies for the description of mouse phenotypes. Comp Funct Genomics 2004, 5(6-7):545-551.
18. Howe D, Costanzo M, Fey P, Gojobori T, Hannick L, et al. Big data: the future of biocuration. Nature 2008, 455(7209):47-50.
19. Robinson PN, Köhler S, Bauer S, Seelow D, Horn D, et al. The human phenotype ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2008, 83(5):610-615.
20. Martinez-Morales JR, Henrich T, Ramialison M, Wittbrodt J. New genes in the evolution of the neural crest differentiation program. Genome Biol 2007, 8(3):R36.
21. Ramanathan P, Martin IC, Gardiner-Garden M, Thomson PC, Taylor RM, et al. Transcriptome analysis identifies pathways associated with enhanced maternal performance in QSi5 mice. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:197.
22. Reed DR, Lawler MP, Tordoff MG. Reduced body weight is a common effect of gene knockout in mice. BMC Genet 2008, 9:4.
23. Bao L, Peirce JL, Zhou M, Li H, Goldowitz D, et al. An integrative genomics strategy for systematic characterization of genetic loci modulating phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16(11):1381-1390.
24. Chen J, Xu H, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. Improved human disease candidate gene prioritization using mouse phenotype. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:392.
25. Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Blake JA, Mouse Genome Database Group. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): mouse biology and model systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36(Database issue):D724-D728.
26. Twigger SN, Shimoyama M, Bromberg S, Kwitek AE, Jacob HJ, RGD Team. The Rat Genome Database, update 2007-easing the path from disease to data and back again. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35(Database issue):D658-D662.
27. Lenffer J, Nicholas FW, Castle K, Rao A, Gregory S, et al. OMIA (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals): an enhanced platform and integration into the Entrez search interface at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Database issue):D599-D601.
28. Mallon AM, Blake A, Hancock JM. EuroPhenome and EMPReSS: onlinemouse phenotyping resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(Database issue):D715-D718.