PhenoDigm: Analyzing curated annotations to associate animal models with human diseases

Database

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Smedley, Damian ^a   Oellrich, Anika ^a   Köhler, Sebastian ^b   Ruef, Barbara ^c   Westerfield, Monte ^c   Robinson, Peter ^b   Lewis, Suzanna ^d   Mungall, Christopher ^d  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^d LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA MINING; DISEASE MODEL; DISEASES; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; PHENOTYPE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEMANTICS;

ANIMALS; DATA MINING; DATABASES, GENETIC; DISEASE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHENOTYPE; ROC CURVE; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84885393730     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/bat025     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amberger,J., Bocchini,C. and Amosh,A. (2011) A new face and new challenges for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®). Hum. Mutat., 32, 4.
2. Lindblom,A. and Robinson,P.N. (2011) Bioinformatics for human genetics: promises and challenges. Hum. Mutat., 32, 495-500.
3. Rosenthal,N. and Brown,S. (2007) The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 993-999.
4. Skarnes,W.C., Rosen,B., West,A.P. et al. (2011) A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature, 474, 337-342.
5. Bult,C.J., Eppig,J.T., Blake,J.A. et al. (2013) The mouse genome database: genotypes, phenotypes, and models of human disease. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D885-D891.
6. Brown,S.D.M. and Moore,M.W. (2012) The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mamm. Genome, 23, 632-640.
7. Ayadi,A., Birling,M.C., Bottomley,J. et al. (2012) Mouse large-scale phenotyping initiatives: overview of the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project. Mamm. Genome, 23, 600-610.
8. Morgan,H., Beck,T., Blake,A. et al. (2010) EuroPhenome: a repository for high-throughput mouse phenotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D577-D585.
9. Mungall,C.J., Gkoutos,G.V., Smith,C.L. et al. (2010) Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biol., 11, R2.
10. McGary,K.L., Park,T.J., Woods,J.O. et al . (2010) Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6544-6549.
11. Bard,J. (2003) Ontologies: formalising biological knowledge for bioinformatics. BioEssays, 25, 501-506.
12. Robinson,P.N., Köhler,S., Bauer,S. et al. (2008) The human phenotype ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 83, 610-615.
13. Smith,C.L. and Eppig,J.T. (2009) The mammalian phenotype ontology: enabling robust annotation and comparative analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med., 1, 390-399.
14. Smith,C.L. and Eppig,J.T. (2012) The mammalian phenotype ontology as a unifying standard for experimental and high-throughput phenotyping data. Mamm. Genome, 23, 653-668.
15. Schindelman,G., Fernandes,J.S., Bastiani,C.A. et al. (2011) Worm phenotype ontology: integrating phenotype data within and beyond the C. elegans community. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 32.
16. Washington,N.L., Haendel,M.A., Mungall,C.J. et al . (2009) Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation. PLoS Biol., 7, e1000247.
17. Chen,C.-K., Mungall,C.J., Gkoutos,G.V. et al. (2012) MouseFinder: candidate disease genes from mouse phenotype data. Hum. Mutat., 33, 858-866.
18. Börnigen,D., Tranchevent,L.-C., Bonachela-Capdevila,F. et al. (2012) An unbiased evaluation of gene prioritization tools. Bioinformatics, 28, 3081-3088.
19. Tranchevent,L.-C., Barriot,R., Yu,S. et al. (2008) ENDEAVOUR update: a web resource for gene prioritization in multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W377-W384.
20. Köhler,S., Bauer,S., Horn,D. et al. (2008) Walking the interactome for prioritization of candidate disease genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 82, 949-958.
21. Perez-Iratxeta,C., Bork,P. and Andrade-Navarro,M.A. (2007) Update of the G2D tool for prioritization of gene candidates to inherited diseases. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W212-W216.
22. Pesquita,C., Faria,D., Falcão,A.O. et al. (2009) Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000443.
23. Hoehndorf,R., Schofield,P.N. and Gkoutos,G.V. (2011) PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, e119.
24. Hoehndorf,R., Dumontier,M., Oellrich,A. et al. (2011) A common layer of interoperability for biomedical ontologies based on OWL EL. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 27, 1001-1008.
25. Oellrich,A., Hoehndorf,R., Gkoutos,G.V. et al. (2012) Improving disease gene prioritization by comparing the semantic similarity of phenotypes in mice with those of human diseases. Plos One, 7, 10.
26. Sardana,D., Vasa,S., Vepachedu,N. et al. (2010) PhenoHM: human-mouse comparative phenome-genome server. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, 10.
27. Bodenreider,O. (2004) The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D267-D270.
28. Aronson,A.R. and Lang,F.-M. (2010) An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 17, 229-236.
29. Howe,D.G., Bradford,Y.M., Conlin,T. et al. (2013) ZFIN, the Zebrafish Model Organism Database: increased support for mutants and transgenics. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D854-D860.
30. Smith,B., Ashburner,M., Rosse,C. et al. (2007) The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 1251-1255.
31. Pesquita,C., Faria,D., Bastos,H. et al . (2008) Metrics for GO based protein semantic similarity: a systematic evaluation. BMC Bioinformatics, 9 (Suppl 5), S4.
32. Rieder,M.J., Green,G.E., Park,S.S. et al. (2012) A human homeotic transformation resulting from mutations in PLCB4 and GNAI3 causes auriculocondylar syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 90, 907-914.
33. Jin,Y.-R., Turcotte,T.J., Crocker,A.L. et al. (2011) The canonical Wnt signaling activator, R-spondin2, regulates craniofacial patterning and morphogenesis within the branchial arch through ectoder-mal-mesenchymal interaction. Dev. Biol., 352, 1-13.
34. Lind,L., Lundström,A., Hofer,P.A. et al . (1994) The gene for diffuse palmoplantar keratoderma of the type found in northern Sweden is localized to chromosome 12q11-q13. Hum. Mol. Genet., 3, 1789-1793.
35. Reis,A., Hennies,H.C., Langbein,L. et al. (1994) Keratin 9 gene mutations in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK). Nat. Genet., 6, 174-179.
36. Davies,A.F., Stephens,R.J., Olavesen,M.G. et al. (1995) Evidence of a locus for orofacial clefting on human chromosome 6p24 and STS content map of the region. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 121-128.
37. Davies,S.J., Wise,C., Venkatesh,B. et al . (2004) Mapping of three translocation breakpoints associated with orofacial clefting within 6p24 and identification of new transcripts within the region. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 105, 47-53.
38. Milunsky,J.M., Maher,T.M., Zhao,G. et al. (2008) TFAP2A mutations result in branchio-oculo-facial syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 82, 1171-1177.