Mouse tetrad analysis provides insights into recombination mechanisms and hotspot evolutionary dynamics

Nature Genetics

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1072-1080

  Cole, Francesca ^a,b   Baudat, Frédéric ^c   Grey, Corinne ^c   Keeney, Scott ^a   De Massy, Bernard ^c   Jasin, Maria ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; LYSINE; HISTONE LYSINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; PRDM9 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE CONVERSION; GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INDEL MUTATION; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPERMATOCYTE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; C57BL MOUSE; CROSSING OVER; CYTOLOGY; DBA MOUSE; FEMALE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; INBRED MOUSE STRAIN; MALE; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SOUTHWESTERN BLOTTING;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, SOUTHWESTERN; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENE CONVERSION; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; OOCYTES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SPERMATOCYTES;

EID: 84922009351     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3068     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Hunter, N. in Topics in Current Genetics, Molecular Genetics of Recombination Vol. 17/2007 (eds. Aguilera, A. & Rothstein, R.) 381-442 (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2007).
2. Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 603-754 (1999).
3. de Massy, B. Initiation of meiotic recombination: how and where? Conservation and specifcities among eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 563-599 (2013).
4. Winge, O. & Laustsen, O. On two types of spore germination, and on genetic segregations in Saccharomycetes demonstrated through single-spore culture. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg., Ser. Physiol. 22, 99-117 (1937).
5. Hurst, D.D., Fogel, S. & Mortimer, R.K. Conversion-associated recombination in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 101-105 (1972).
6. Szostak, J.W., Orr-Weaver, T.L., Rothstein, R.J. & Stahl, F.W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 33, 25-35 (1983).
7. Allers, T. & Lichten, M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106, 47-57 (2001).
8. Börner, G.V., Kleckner, N. & Hunter, N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117, 29-45 (2004).
9. Hunter, N. & Kleckner, N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106, 59-70 (2001).
10. Martini, E. et al. Genome-wide analysis of heteroduplex DNA in mismatch repair-defcient yeast cells reveals novel properties of meiotic recombination pathways. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002305 (2011).
11. McMahill, M.S., Sham, C.W. & Bishop, D.K. Synthesis-dependent strand annealing in meiosis. PLoS Biol. 5, e299 (2007).
12. Arnheim, N., Calabrese, P. & Tiemann-Boege, I. Mammalian meiotic recombination hot spots. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 369-399 (2007).
13. Baudat, F., Imai, Y. & de Massy, B. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 794-806 (2013).
14. Paigen, K. & Petkov, P. Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 221-233 (2010).
15. Hou, Y. et al. Genome analyses of single human oocytes. Cell 155, 1492-1506 (2013).
16. Lu, S. et al. Probing meiotic recombination and aneuploidy of single sperm cells by whole-genome sequencing. Science 338, 1627-1630 (2012).
17. Wang, J., Fan, H.C., Behr, B. & Quake, S.R. Genome-wide single-cell analysis of recombination activity and de novo mutation rates in human sperm. Cell 150, 402-412 (2012).
18. Cole, F., Keeney, S. & Jasin, M. Comprehensive, fne-scale dissection of homologous recombination outcomes at a hot spot in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 39, 700-710 (2010).
19. Guillon, H., Baudat, F., Grey, C., Liskay, R.M. & de Massy, B. Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 20, 563-573 (2005).
20. Guillon, H. & de Massy, B. An initiation site for meiotic crossing-over and gene conversion in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 32, 296-299 (2002).
21. Jeffreys, A.J. & May, C.A. Intense and highly localized gene conversion activity in human meiotic crossover hot spots. Nat. Genet. 36, 151-156 (2004).
22. Ng, S.H., Parvanov, E., Petkov, P.M. & Paigen, K. A quantitative assay for crossover and noncrossover molecular events at individual recombination hotspots in both male and female gametes. Genomics 92, 204-209 (2008).
23. Baudat, F. & de Massy, B. Cis-and trans-acting elements regulate the mouse Psmb9 meiotic recombination hotspot. PLoS Genet. 3, e100 (2007).
24. Keeney, S. in Recombination and Meiosis (eds. Egel, R. & Lankenau, D.-H.) 81-123 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany, 2007).
25. Cole, F., Keeney, S. & Jasin, M. Evolutionary conservation of meiotic DSB proteins: more than just Spo11. Genes Dev. 24, 1201-1207 (2010).
26. Kauppi, L., Jeffreys, A.J. & Keeney, S. Where the crossovers are: recombination distributions in mammals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 413-424 (2004).
27. Baudat, F. et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327, 836-840 (2010).
28. Brick, K., Smagulova, F., Khil, P., Camerini-Otero, R.D. & Petukhova, G.V. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485, 642-645 (2012).
29. Myers, S. et al. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327, 876-879 (2010).
30. Parvanov, E.D., Petkov, P.M. & Paigen, K. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327, 835 (2010).
31. Billings, T. et al. DNA binding specifcities of the long zinc-fnger recombination protein PRDM9. Genome Biol. 14, R35 (2013).
32. Grey, C. et al. Mouse PRDM9 DNA-binding specifcity determines sites of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation for initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001176 (2011).
33. Jeffreys, A.J. & Neumann, R. Reciprocal crossover asymmetry and meiotic drive in a human recombination hot spot. Nat. Genet. 31, 267-271 (2002).
34. Buard, J., Barthes, P., Grey, C. & de Massy, B. Distinct histone modifcations defne initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J. 28, 2616-2624 (2009).
35. Bastos, H. et al. Flow cytometric characterization of viable meiotic and postmeiotic cells by Hoechst 33342 in mouse spermatogenesis. Cytometry A 65, 40-49 (2005).
36. Cole, F. & Jasin, M. Isolation of meiotic recombinants from mouse sperm. Methods Mol. Biol. 745, 251-282 (2011).
37. Baker, S.M. et al. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat. Genet. 13, 336-342 (1996).
38. Woods, L.M. et al. Chromosomal infuence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice. J. Cell Biol. 145, 1395-1406 (1999).
39. Mancera, E., Bourgon, R., Brozzi, A., Huber, W. & Steinmetz, L.M. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454, 479-485 (2008).
40. Bois, P.R. A highly polymorphic meiotic recombination mouse hot spot exhibits incomplete repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 7053-7062 (2007).
41. Jeffreys, A.J. & Neumann, R. Factors infuencing recombination frequency and distribution in a human meiotic crossover hotspot. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 2277-2287 (2005).
42. Odenthal-Hesse, L., Berg, I.L., Veselis, A., Jeffreys, A.J. & May, C.A. Transmission distortion affecting human noncrossover but not crossover recombination: a hidden source of meiotic drive. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004106 (2014).
43. Sarbajna, S. et al. A major recombination hotspot in the XqYq pseudoautosomal region gives new insight into processing of human gene conversion events. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 2029-2038 (2012).
44. Yauk, C.L., Bois, P.R. & Jeffreys, A.J. High-resolution sperm typing of meiotic recombination in the mouse MHC Eβ gene. EMBO J. 22, 1389-1397 (2003).
45. Wu, L. & Hickson, I.D. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426, 870-874 (2003).
46. Chen, S.Y. et al. Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev. Cell 15, 401-415 (2008).
47. Kauppi, L. et al. Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev. 27, 873-886 (2013).
48. Baker, C.L., Walker, M., Kajita, S., Petkov, P.M. & Paigen, K. PRDM9 binding organizes hotspot nucleosomes and limits Holliday junction migration. Genome Res. 24, 724-732 (2014).
49. Pan, J. et al. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144, 719-731 (2011).
50. Radford, S.J., Sabourin, M.M., McMahan, S. & Sekelsky, J. Meiotic recombination in Drosophila Msh6 mutants yields discontinuous gene conversion tracts. Genetics 176, 53-62 (2007).
51. Oh, S.D. et al. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130, 259-272 (2007).
52. Oh, S.D., Lao, J.P., Taylor, A.F., Smith, G.R. & Hunter, N. RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol. Cell 31, 324-336 (2008).
53. Goldfarb, T. & Lichten, M. Frequent and effcient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000520 (2010).
54. Boulton, A., Myers, R.S. & Redfeld, R.J. The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8058-8063 (1997).
55. Coop, G. & Myers, S.R. Live hot, die young: transmission distortion in recombination hotspots. PLoS Genet. 3, e35 (2007).
56. Calabrese, P. A population genetics model with recombination hotspots that are heterogeneous across the population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4748-4752 (2007).
57. Pineda-Krch, M. & Redfeld, R.J. Persistence and loss of meiotic recombination hotspots. Genetics 169, 2319-2333 (2005).
58. Anderson, L.K., Reeves, A., Webb, L.M. & Ashley, T. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofuorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151, 1569-1579 (1999).
59. Cole, F. et al. Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 424-430 (2012).
60. Shiroishi, T., Sagai, T., Hanzawa, N., Gotoh, H. & Moriwaki, K. Genetic control of sex-dependent meiotic recombination in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. EMBO J. 10, 681-686 (1991).
61. Hanneman, W.H., Schimenti, K.J. & Schimenti, J.C. Molecular analysis of gene conversion in spermatids from transgenic mice. Gene 200, 185-192 (1997).
62. Jeffreys, A.J., Neumann, R. & Wilson, V. Repeat unit sequence variation in minisatellites: a novel source of DNA polymorphism for studying variation and mutation by single molecule analysis. Cell 60, 473-485 (1990).
63. Belloc, F. et al. A fow cytometric method using Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide for simultaneous cell cycle analysis and apoptosis determination in unfxed cells. Cytometry 17, 59-65 (1994).
64. Barchi, M. et al. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000076 (2008).