Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 505-516

  Potters, Wouter V ^a   Van Ooij, Pim ^b   Marquering, Henk ^a   VanBavel, Ed ^a   Nederveen, Aart J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aorta; Blood flow; Carotid artery; Image processing; Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ALGORITHM; AORTA; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESCENDING AORTA; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING PHANTOM; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL CINE PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL CINE PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VOLUMETRIC ARTERIAL WALL SHEAR STRESS CALCULATION; CINE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SHEAR STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 84921882877     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24560     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Chiu JJ, Chien S. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol Rev 2011;91:327-387.
2. Boussel L, Rayz V, McCulloch C, et al. Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997-3002.
3. Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, Russe MF, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:77-84.
4. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035-2042.
5. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2379-2393.
6. Duivenvoorden R, vanBavel E, de Groot E, et al. Endothelial shear stress: a critical determinant of arterial remodeling and arterial stiffness in humans - a carotid 3.0-T MRI study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:578-585.
7. Markl M, Brendecke SM, Simon J, Barker AJ, Weiller C, Harloff A. Co-registration of the distribution of wall shear stress and 140 complex plaques of the aorta. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:1156-1162.
8. Bürk J, Blanke P, Stankovic Z, et al. Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:988-994.
9. Barker AJ, Lanning C, Shandas R. Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:788-800.
10. Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:457-466.
11. Castro MA, Putman CM, Sheridan MJ, Cebral JR. Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a possible association with rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:297-302.
12. Meng H, Tutino VM, J X, Siddiqui A. High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014:1-9.
13. Oyre S, Ringgaard S, Kozerke S, et al. Accurate noninvasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional lumen vessel area and wall shear stress by three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:128-134.
14. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218-1231.
15. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409-417.
16. Bieging ET, Frydrychowicz A, Wentland A, et al. In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:589-597.
17. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Mukundan S, Loth F, Pettigrew RI. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:640-647.
18. Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P. Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:128-138.
19. Sibson R. A brief description of natural neighbour interpolation. Interpreting Multivariate Data 1981:21-36.
20. Reinsch CH. Smoothing by spline functions. Numerische Mathematik 1967;10:177-183.
21. Gnasso A, Carallo C, Irace C, et al. Association between intima-media thickness and wall shear stress in common carotid arteries in healthy male subjects. Circulation 1996;94:3257-3262.
22. Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A, Enzmann DR. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991;7:229-254.
23. Gudbjartsson H, PATZ S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:910-914.
24. Liang Z-P, Lauterbur PC. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2000.
25. Li C, Huang R, Ding Z, Gatenby JC, Metaxas DN, Gore JC. A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI. IEEE Trans Image Process 2011;20:2007-2016.
26. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116-1128.
27. Vollmer J, Mencl R, Muller H. Improved Laplacian smoothing of noisy surface meshes. Comput Graph Forum 1999;18:C131-C138.
28. Cheng CP, Parker D, Taylor CA. Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using Lagrangian interpolation functions with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30:1020-1032.
29. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Kohler U, et al. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:153-162.
30. Köhler U, Marshall I, Robertson MB, Long Q, Xu XY, Hoskins PR. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:563-573.
31. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, et al. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroradiology 2010;52:913-920.
32. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. 4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:861-869.
33. Hofman MBM, Visser FC, van Rossum AC, Vink GQM, Sprenger M, Westerhof N. In vivo validation of magnetic resonance blood volume flow measurements with limited spatial resolution in small vessels. Magn Reson Med 2012;33:778-784.
34. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:377-385.
35. Strecker C, Harloff A, Wallis W, Markl M. Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;5:1097-1103.
36. Efstathopoulos EP, Patatoukas G, Pantos I, Benekos O, Katritsis D, Kelekis NL. Wall shear stress calculation in ascending aorta using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Investigating effective ways to calculate it in clinical practice. Phys Med 2008;24:175-181.
37. Renner J, Nadali Najafabadi H, Modin D, Länne T, Karlsson M. Subject-specific aortic wall shear stress estimations using semi-automatic segmentation. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2012;32:481-491.
38. Reneman RS, Arts T, Hoeks APG. Wall shear stress - an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure - in the arterial system in vivo. J Vasc Res 2006;43:251-269.
39. Wang C, Chen M, Liu S-L, Liu Y, Jin J-M, Zhang Y-H. Spatial distribution of wall shear stress in common carotid artery by color Doppler flow imaging. J Digit Imaging 2012;26:466-471.
40. Sui B, Gao P, Lin Y, Gao B, Liu L, An J. Blood flow pattern and wall shear stress in the internal carotid arteries of healthy subjects. Acta Radiol 2008;49:806-814.
41. Box FMA, van der Geest RJ, van der Grond J, et al. Reproducibility of wall shear stress assessment with the paraboloid method in the internal carotid artery with velocity encoded MRI in healthy young individuals. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:598-605.
42. Pruessmann K, Weiger M, Scheidegger M, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
43. Thunberg P, Karlsson M, Wigström L. Accuracy and reproducibility in phase contrast imaging using SENSE. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1061-1068.
44. Van Ooij P, Potters WV, Guedon A, et al. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
45. Van Ooij P, Guedon A, Poelma C, et al. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging compared with particle imaging velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed 2012;25:14-26.