In vivo three-dimensional mr wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 589-597

  Bieging, Erik T ^a   Frydrychowicz, Alex ^a   Wentland, Andrew ^b   Landgraf, Benjamin R ^a   Johnson, Kevin M ^b   Wieben, Oliver ^a,b   François, Christopher J ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Ascending aortic aneurysm; Flow sensitive MRI; Hemodynamics; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLE; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; VASODILATATION; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA; AORTIC DISEASES; CHILD; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MICROSCOPY, PHASE-CONTRAST; MIDDLE AGED; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79952261074     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22485     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Elefteriades JA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm: reading the enemy's playbook. Curr Probl Cardiol 2008;33:203-277. (Pubitemid 351551418)
2. Kirsch EW, Radu NC, Allaire E, Loisance DY. Pathobiology of idiopathic ascending aortic aneurysms. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2006;14:254-260. (Pubitemid 43871249)
3. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:17-27; discussion 27-28.
4. Hope TA, Markl M, Wigstrom L, Alley MT, Miller DC, Herfkens RJ. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1471-1479. (Pubitemid 350291274)
5. Weigang E, Kari FA, Beyersdorf F, et al. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:11-16.
6. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R, et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006;113:2744-2753. (Pubitemid 43947992)
7. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035-2042.
8. Meng H, Wang Z, Hoi Y, et al. Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke 2007;38:1924-1931. (Pubitemid 46847270)
9. Boussel L, Rayz V, McCulloch C, et al. Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997-3002.
10. Jin S, Oshinski J, Giddens DP. Effects of wall motion and compliance on flow patterns in the ascending aorta. J Biomech Eng 2003;125:347-354. (Pubitemid 36876428)
11. Leuprecht A, Perktold K, Kozerke S, Boesiger P. Combined CFD and MRI study of blood flow in a human ascending aorta model. Biorheology 2002;39:425-429. (Pubitemid 34989039)
12. Les AS, Shadden SC, Figueroa CA, et al. Quantification of hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms during rest and exercise using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:1288-1313.
13. Papaharilaou Y, Ekaterinaris JA, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2007;40:367-377. (Pubitemid 44958574)
14. Wolters BJ, Rutten MC, Schurink GW, Kose U, de Hart J, van de Vosse FN. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Eng Phys 2005;27:871-883. (Pubitemid 41608624)
15. Barker AJ, Lanning C, Shandas R. Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:788-800.
16. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409-417.
17. Frydrychowicz A, Arnold R, Hirtler D, et al. Multidirectional flow analysis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in aneurysm development following repair of aortic coarctation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:30.
18. Frydrychowicz A, Berger A, Russe MF, et al. Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for blood flow and wall shear stress analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:400-407.
19. Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, Russe MF, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:77-84.
20. Oyre S, Pedersen EM, Ringgaard S, Boesiger P, Paaske WP. In vivo wall shear stress measured by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the normal human abdominal aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:263-271.
21. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218-1231.
22. Wentzel JJ, Corti R, Fayad ZA, et al. Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:846-854. (Pubitemid 40342807)
23. Du J, Fain SB, Gu T, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Noise reduction in MR angiography with nonlinear anisotropic filtering. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:632-639. (Pubitemid 38619927)
24. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743-749. (Pubitemid 43079762)
25. Gautier M, Detaint D, Fermanian C, et al. Nomograms for aortic root diameters in children using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:888-894.
26. Davies RR, Gallo A, Coady MA, et al. Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:169-177. (Pubitemid 41815395)
27. Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson LE, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:200-209. (Pubitemid 351453837)
28. Johnson KM, Francois C, Lum D, et al. Rapid comprehensive evaluation of luminography and hemodynamic function with 3D radially undersampled phase contrast imaging MRI. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:4057-4060.
29. Johnson KM, Lum DP, Turski PA, Block WF, Mistretta CA, Wieben O. Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1329-1336.
30. Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, et al. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:330-338.
31. Du J, Carroll TJ, Wagner HJ, et al. Time-resolved, undersampled projection reconstruction imaging for high-resolution CE-MRA of the distal runoff vessels. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:516-522. (Pubitemid 34951330)
32. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 2010;255:53-61.
33. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993;88(Pt 1):2235-2247. (Pubitemid 23326104)
34. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:459-468. (Pubitemid 38988812)
35. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ, Kilner PJ, Firmin DN. Magnetic resonance velocity vector mapping of blood flow in thoracic aortic aneurysms and grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:704-714.
36. Liu X, Weale P, Reiter G, et al. Breathhold time-resolved three-directional MR velocity mapping of aortic flow in patients after aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:569-575.
37. Kvitting JP, Ebbers T, Wigstrom L, Engvall J, Olin CL, Bolger AF. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1602-1607. (Pubitemid 38725437)
38. Markl M, Draney MT, Miller DC, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:456-463. (Pubitemid 41074178)
39. Frydrychowicz A, Berger A, Stalder AF, et al. Diameter-Dependence of Aortic Hemodynamics: Does Size Matter? In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, 2008. (abstract 2828).
40. Santini F, Wetzel SG, Bock J, Markl M, Scheffler K. Time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast (PC) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP). Magn Reson Med 2009;62:966-974.
41. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995;75:519-560.