Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 128-138

  Petersson, Sven ^a   Dyverfeldt, Petter ^a,b   Ebbers, Tino ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

atherosclerosis; Fourier velocity encoding; hemodynamics; numerical simulations; phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; FOURIER VELOCITY ENCODING METHOD; INTRAVOXEL VELOCITY STANDARD DEVIATION MAPPING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARTERIES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 84862740233     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23610     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brooks AR, Lelkes PI, Rubanyi GM,. Gene expression profiling of human aortic endothelial cells exposed to disturbed flow and steady laminar flow. Physiol Genom 2002; 9: 27.
2. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R, et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006; 113: 2744.
3. Malek A, Alper S, Izumo S,. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999; 282: 2035.
4. Reneman RS, Arts T, Hoeks APG,. Wall shear stress-an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure-in the arterial system in vivo. J Vasc Res 2006; 43: 251-269. (Pubitemid 44257044)
5. Shaaban A, Duerinckx A,. Wall shear stress and early atherosclerosis: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1657-1665. (Pubitemid 30346735)
6. Boussel L, Rayz V, McCulloch C, et al. Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress. Stroke 2008; 39: 2997-3002.
7. Cheng CP, Parker D, Taylor CA,. Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using Lagrangian interpolation functions with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30: 1020-1032. (Pubitemid 35457698)
8. Lou Z, Yang W, Stein P,. Errors in the estimation of arterial wall shear rates that result from curve fitting of velocity profiles. J Biomech 1993; 26: 383-390. (Pubitemid 23226646)
9. Oshinski J, Ku D, Mukundan S Jr, Loth F, Pettigrew R,. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 640-647.
10. Oyre S, Pedersen E, Ringgaard S, Boesiger P, Paaske W,. In vivo wall shear stress measured by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the normal human abdominal aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13: 263-271. (Pubitemid 27170882)
11. Stalder A, Russe M, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M,. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1218-1231.
12. Barker A, Lanning C, Shandas R,. Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 788-800.
13. Harloff A, Nußbaumer A, Bauer S, et al. In vivo assessment of wall shear stress in the atherosclerotic aorta using flow sensitive 4D MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1529-1536.
14. Frayne R, Rutt B,. Measurement of fluid-shear rate by Fourier-encoded velocity imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 378-388.
15. Carvalho J, Nielsen J, Nayak K,. Feasibility of in vivo measurement of carotid wall shear rate using spiral fourier velocity encoded MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1537-1547.
16. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Knutsson H, Ebbers T,. A novel MRI framework for the quantification of any moment of arbitrary velocity distributions. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 725-731.
17. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Kvitting J, Ebbers T,. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 850-858. (Pubitemid 44477668)
18. Gao J, Gore J,. Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity. Med Phys 1991; 18: 1045.
19. Pipe J,. A simple measure of flow disorder and wall shear stress in phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 543-550. (Pubitemid 36262823)
20. Bieging ET, Frydrychowicz A, Wentland A, et al. In vivo three dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 589-597.
21. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, et al. Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 409-417.
22. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A,. Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 988-994.
23. Masaryk A, Frayne R, Unal O, Krupinski E, Strother C,. In vitro and in vivo comparison of three MR measurement methods for calculating vascular shear stress in the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 237.
24. Leuprecht A, Kozerke S, Boesiger P, Perktold K,. Blood flow in the human ascending aorta: a combined MRI and CFD study. J Eng Math 2003; 47: 387-404. (Pubitemid 38136075)
25. Renner J, Gardhagen R, Ebbers T, Heiberg E, Lanne T, Karlsson M,. A method for subject specific estimation of aortic wall shear stress. WSEAS Trans Biol Biomed 2009; 6: 49-57.
26. Steinman DA, Thomas JB, Ladak HM, Milner JS, Rutt BK, Spence JD,. Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 149-159. (Pubitemid 34019704)
27. Lee KL, Doorly DJ, Firmin DN,. Numerical simulations of phase contrast velocity mapping of complex flows in an anatomically realistic bypass graft geometry. Med Phys 2006; 33: 2621-2631. (Pubitemid 43967251)
28. Marshall I,. Computational simulations and experimental studies of 3D phase contrast imaging of fluid flow in carotid bifurcation geometries. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 928-934.
29. Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P, Gardhagen R, Karlsson M, Ebbers T,. Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1039-1046.
30. Oyre S, Ringgaard S, Kozerke S, et al. Quantitation of circumferential subpixel vessel wall position and wall shear stress by multiple sectored three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of velocity encoded cine MR. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 645-655. (Pubitemid 28493640)
31. Steinman DA, Taylor CA,. Flow imaging and computing: large artery hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33: 1704-1709. (Pubitemid 43040015)
32. Stroud J, Berger S, Saloner D,. Numerical analysis of flow through a severely stenotic carotid artery bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124: 9.
33. Jou LD, Quick CM, Young WL, et al. Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1804.
34. Steinman DA, Milner JS, Norley CJ, Lownie SP, Holdsworth DW,. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 559.