Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 876-884

  Van Ooij, Pim ^a   Potters, Wouter V ^a   Guédon, Annetje ^a   Schneiders, Joppe J ^a   Marquering, Henk A ^a   Majoie, Charles B ^a   Vanbavel, Ed ^a   Nederveen, Aart J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

in vivo; intracranial aneurysm; phantom; phase contrast MRI; wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION;

IN VIVO; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; PHANTOM; PHASE CONTRAST MRI; WALL SHEAR STRESS;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PULSATILE FLOW; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84886932668     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24051     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003; 362: 103-110.
2. Ford MD, Nikolov HN, Milner JS, et al. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng 2008; 130: 021015.
3. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Burgess JE, Pergolizzi RS, Sheridan MJ, Putman CM,. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2550-2559.
4. Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T, et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 647-655.
5. Wentzel JJ, Corti R, Fayad ZA, et al. Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 846-854.
6. Cebral JR, Mut F, Weir J, Putman C,. Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 145-151.
7. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 409-417.
8. Reneman RS, Arts T, Hoeks AP,. Wall shear stress-an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure-in the arterial system in vivo. Discrepancies with theory. J Vasc Res 2006; 43: 251-269.
9. Steinman DA, Milner JS, Norley CJ, Lownie SP, Holdsworth DW,. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 559-566.
10. Wigstrom L, Sjoqvist L, Wranne B,. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 800-803.
11. Markl M, Kilner PJ, Ebbers T,. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13: 7.
12. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Mukundan S Jr, Loth F, Pettigrew RI,. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 640-647.
13. Stokholm R, Oyre S, Ringgaard S, Flaagoy H, Paaske WP, Pedersen EM,. Determination of wall shear rate in the human carotid artery by magnetic resonance techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20: 427-433.
14. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Kohler U, et al. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 153-162.
15. Stalder A, Russe M, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M,. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1218-1231.
16. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A,. Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 988-994.
17. Bieging ET, Frydrychowicz A, Wentland A, et al. In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 589-597.
18. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, et al. In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 921-928.
19. Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T,. Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 128-138.
20. van Ooij P, Guédon A, Poelma C, et al. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed 2012; 25: 14-26.
21. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman D,. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008; 46: 1097-1112.
22. Slavin GS, Bluemke DA,. Spatial and temporal resolution in cardiovascular MR imaging: review and recommendations. Radiology 2005; 234: 330-338.
23. Jenkinson M, Smith S,. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001; 5: 143-156.
24. Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD,. Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Vol. 1. San Diego, CA; 2005. p 430-436.
25. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys 1990; 17: 287-295.
26. Unser M,. Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Process Mag 1999; 16: 22-38.
27. Vollmer J, Mencl R, Müller H,. Improved Laplacian smoothing of noisy surface meshes. EUROGRAPHICS 1999; 18 (3).
28. Cheng CP, Parker D, Taylor CA,. Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using Lagrangian interpolation functions with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30: 1020-1032.
29. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, et al. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 913-920.
30. Chiu JJ, Chien S,. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol Rev 2011; 91: 327-387.
31. van Ooij P, Zwanenburg JJM, Visser F, et al. Quantification and visualization of flow in the circle of Willis: time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI at 7 T compared with 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
32. Busch J, Giese D, Wissmann L, Kozerke S,. Reconstruction of divergence-free velocity fields from cine 3D phase-contrast flow measurements. Magn Reson Med 2012; 69: 200-210.