Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: Phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 14-26

  van Ooij, P ^a   Guedon A ^a   Poelma, C ^b   Schneiders, J ^a   Rutten, M C M ^c   Marquering, H A ^a   Majoie, C B ^a   van Bavel, E ^a   Nederveen, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Blood flow velocity; Computational fluid dynamics; Intracranial aneurysm phantom; Particle image velocimetry; Phase contrast MRI

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PHASE CONTRAST MRI;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DYNAMICS; ERRORS; FLOW PATTERNS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; FLUIDS; HEMODYNAMICS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VECTORS; VELOCIMETERS; VELOCITY; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VELOCITY;

ANIMALS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PULSATILE FLOW; RATS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEOLOGY;

RATTUS; SOLENOIDEA;

EID: 84855877261     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1706     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Moran PR. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1982; 1(4): 197-203.
2. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, Wedding KL, Draney MT, Elkins CJ, Parker DW, Wicker R, Taylor CA, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2003; 17(4): 499-506.
3. Stalder A, Russe M, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008; 60(5): 1218-1231.
4. Canstein C, Cachot P, Faust A, Stalder AF, Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Kuffer J, Hennig J, Markl M. 3D MR flow analysis in realistic rapid-prototyping model systems of the thoracic aorta: comparison with in vivo data and computational fluid dynamics in identical vessel geometries. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008; 59(3): 535-546.
5. Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, Russe MF, Bock J, Bauer S, Harloff A, Berger A, Langer M, Hennig J, Markl M. Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2009; 30(1): 77-84.
6. Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J, Stalder A, Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Schöllhorn J, Hetzel A, Schumacher M, Hennig J, Markl M. 3D blood flow characteristics in the carotid artery bifurcation assessed by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61(1): 65-74.
7. Köhler U, Marshall I, Robertson MB, Long Q, Xu XY, Hoskins PR. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2001; 14(5): 563-573.
8. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Kohler U, Robertson MB, Long Q, Hoskins P, Xu XY, Marshall I. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2003; 17(2): 153-162.
9. Yamashita S, Isoda H, Hirano M, Takeda H, Inagawa S, Takehara Y, Alley MT, Markl M, Pelc NJ, Sakahara H. Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2007; 25(3): 473-478.
10. Wetzel S, Meckel S, Frydrychowicz A, Bonati L, Radue EW, Scheffler K, Hennig J, Markl M. In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(3): 433-438.
11. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, Hirano M, Alley MT, Bammer R, Pelc NJ, Namba H, Sakahara H. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroradiology, 2010; 52(10): 913-920.
12. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, Acevedo-Bolton G, Lawton MT, Higashida R, Smith WS, Young WL, Saloner D. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61(2): 409-417.
13. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, Hirano M, Takeda H, Hiramatsu H, Yamashita S, Takehara Y, Alley M, Bammer R, Pelc N, Namba H, Sakahara H. In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Neuroradiology, 2010; 52(10): 921-928.
14. Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 355(9): 928-939.
15. Proust F, Gerardin E, Chazal J. Unruptured intracranial aneurysm and microsurgical exclusion: the need of a randomized study of surgery versus natural history. J. Neuroradiol. 2008; 35(2): 109-115.
16. Spelle L, Pierot L. Endovascular treatment of non-ruptured intracranial aneurysms: critical analysis of the literature. J. Neuroradiol. 2008; 35(2): 116-120.
17. Kayembe KN, Sasahara M, Hazama F. Cerebral aneurysms and variations in the circle of Willis. Stroke, 1984; 15(5): 846-850.
18. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Burgess JE, Pergolizzi RS, Sheridan MJ, Putman CM. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005; 26(10): 2550-2559.
19. Castro MA, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics modeling of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a study of the sensitivity of intra-aneurysmal flow patterns to flow conditions in the carotid arteries. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(10): 2061-2068.
20. Castro MA, Putman CM, Sheridan MJ, Cebral JR. Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a possible association with rupture. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(2): 297-302.
21. Castro MA, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(8): 1703-1709.
22. Chien A, Castro MA, Tateshima S, Sayre J, Cebral J, Vinuela F. Quantitative hemodynamic analysis of brain aneurysms at different locations. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(8): 1507-1512.
23. Szikora I, Paal G, Ugron A, Nasztanovics F, Marosfoi M, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Lee W, Bojtar I, Nyary I. Impact of aneurysmal geometry on intraaneurysmal flow: a computerized flow simulation study. Neuroradiology, 2008; 50(5): 411-421.
24. Meckel S, Stalder AF, Santini F, Radu EW, Rufenacht DA, Markl M, Wetzel SG. In vivo visualization and analysis of 3-D hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms with flow-sensitized 4-D MR imaging at 3 T. Neuroradiology, 2008; 50(6): 473-484.
25. Hollnagel DI, Summers PE, Kollias SS, Poulikakos D. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and 3D phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC-MRA) velocity measurements: validation in an anatomically accurate cerebral artery aneurysm model with steady flow. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2007; 26(6): 1493-1505.
26. Hollnagel DI, Summers PE, Poulikakos D, Kollias SS. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed. 2009; 22(8): 795-808.
27. Acevedo-Bolton G, Jou LD, Dispensa BP, Lawton MT, Higashida RT, Martin AJ, Young WL, Saloner D. Estimating the hemodynamic impact of interventional treatments of aneurysms: numerical simulation with experimental validation: technical case report. Neurosurgery, 2006; 59(2): E429-E430; author reply E429-E430.
28. Isoda H, Hirano M, Takeda H, Kosugi T, Alley MT, Markl M, Pelc NJ, Sakahara H. Visualization of hemodynamics in a silicon aneurysm model using time-resolved, 3D, phase-contrast MRI. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(5): 1119-1122.
29. Tateshima S, Grinstead J, Sinha S, Nien YL, Murayama Y, Villablanca JP, Tanishita K, Vinuela F. Intraaneurysmal flow visualization by using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility study based on a geometrically realistic in vitro aneurysm model. J. Neurosurg. 2004; 100(6): 1041-1048.
30. Hofman MB, Visser FC, van Rossum AC, Vink QM, Sprenger M, Westerhof N. In vivo validation of magnetic resonance blood volume flow measurements with limited spatial resolution in small vessels. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995; 33(6): 778-784.
31. Adrian RJ, Westerweel J. Particle Imaging Velocimetry. Cambridge University Press: New York; 2010.
32. Poelma C, Vennemann P, Lindken R, Westerweel J. In vivo blood flow and wall shear stress measurements in the vitelline network. Exp. Fluids, 2008; 45(4): 703-713.
33. Lenz GW, Haacke EM, White RD. Retrospective cardiac gating: a review of technical aspects and future directions. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1989; 7(5): 445-455.
34. Pelc NJ, Bernstein MA, Shimakawa A, Glover GH. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1991; 1(4): 405-413.
35. Frank LR, Buxton RB, Kerber CW. Pulsatile flow artifacts in 3D magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993; 30(3): 296-304.
36. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics, 2002; 22(3): 651-671.
37. Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, King KF, Ganin A, Pelc NJ, Glover GH. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39(2): 300-308.
38. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman D. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2008; 46(11): 1097-1112.
39. Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD. Level set evolution without re-initialization: A new variational formulation. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR'05, San Diego, USA, 2005; 1: 430-436.
40. Westerweel J, Scarano F. Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp. Fluids, 2005; 39(6): 1096-1100.
41. Ford MD, Nikolov HN, Milner JS, Lownie SP, DeMont EM, Kalata W, Loth F, Holdsworth DW, Steinman DA. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models. J. Biomech. Eng. 2008; 130(2): 021015.