The DEKA Arm: Its features, functionality, and evolution during the veterans affairs study to optimize the DEKA Arm

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 492-504

  Resnik, Linda ^a,b   Klinger, Shana L ^a   Etter, Katherine ^b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputation; Assistive technology; Prosthetics; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CONTROL; ENERGY RESOURCE; FOOT; HAND GRIP; HUMERUS; SHOULDER; VETERAN; WEIGHT; WRIST; ARM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; EVALUATION STUDY; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); POWER SUPPLY; PROSTHESIS; RADIUS; REHABILITATION; SELF HELP DEVICE; SURGERY; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES; HUMANS; HUMERUS; MOVEMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIUS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; SHOULDER; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; UPPER EXTREMITY; WRIST;

EID: 84921687999     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309364613506913     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA). Revolutionizing Prosthetics program, http://www.darpa.mil/our-work/dso/programs/revolutionizing-prosthetics.aspx (accessed 21 December 2012
2. Altobelli D, Coulter S and Perry C. Design considerations in upper extremity prostheses. In: MEC'11: raising the standard: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/ powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 14-19 August 2011. Fredericton, NB, Canada: Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick
3. Resnik L, Etter K, Klinger SL, et al. Using virtual reality environment to facilitate training with advanced upper-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48(6): 707-718
4. Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K, et al. Controlling a multidegree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. Epub ahead of print 31 July 2013. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2013.822024
5. Touch Bionics. http://www.touchbionics.com/products/ active-prostheses/i-limb-ultra/ accessed 22 May 2013
6. Michelangelo Hand. http://www.living-with-michelangelo. com/gb/home/ (accessed 22 May 2013)
7. Kyberd PJ. The Southampton Hand: an intelligent myoelectric prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 1994; 31(4): 326-334
8. Clark S and Weir RF. Development of a clinically viable multifunctional underactuated hand prosthesis using differential transmissions. In: MEC'08: measuring success in upper limb prosthetics: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 13-15 August 2008. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
9. Weir RF. Design of a clinically viable multifunctional prosthetic hand. In: MEC'02: the next generation: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 19-23 August 2002. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
10. Carrozza MC, Massa B, Micera S, et al. The development of a novel prosthetic hand-ongoing research and preliminary results. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2002; 7(2): 108-114
11. Carrozza MC, Zaccone S, Micera G, et al. An adaptive prosthetic hand with compliant joints and EMG-based control. In: MEC'05: integrating prosthetics and medicine: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 17-19 August 2005. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
12. Carrozza MC, Suppo C, Sebastiani F, et al. The SPRING Hand: development of a self-Adaptive prosthesis for restoring natural grasping. Auton Robot 2004; 16: 125-141
13. Dalley SA, Wiste TE, Withrow TJ, et al. Design of a multifunctional anthropomorphic prosthetic hand with extrinsic actuation. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2009; 14: 699-706
14. Dalley SA, Wiste TE, Varol HA, et al. A multigrasp hand prosthesis for transradial amputees. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 5062-5065
15. Dechev N, Cleghorn WL and Naumann S. Multiple finger, passive adaptive grasp prosthetic hand. Mech Mach Theory 2001; 36: 1157-1173
16. Dollar AM and Howe RD. The SDM Hand as a prosthetic terminal device: a feasibility study. In: IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Noordwijk, 12-15 June 2007, pp. 978-983. New York: IEEE
17. Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Oberle R, et al. Preliminary experience with hydraulically driven hand prostheses. In: MEC'05: integrating prosthetics and medicine: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 17-19 August 2005. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
18. Pylatiuk C, Mounier S, Kargov A, et al. Progress in the development of a multifunctional hand prosthesis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004; 6: 4260-4263
19. Pylatiuk C, Schulz S, Kargov A, et al. Two multiarticulated hydraulic hand prostheses. Artif Organs 2004; 28(11): 980-986
20. Ishikawa Y, Yu W, Yokoi H, et al. Development of robotic hands with an adjustable power transmitting mechanism. Intell Eng Syst Neural Netw 2000; 10: 631-636
21. Light CM and Chappell PH. Development of a lightweight and adaptable multiple-Axis hand prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 2000; 22(10): 679-684
22. Pons JL, Rocon E, Ceres R, et al. The MANUS-HAND dextrous robotics upper limb prosthesis: mechanical and manipulation aspects. Auton Robot 2004; 16: 143-163
23. Kamikawa A and Maeno T. Underactuated five-finger prosthetic hand inspired by grasping force distribution of humans. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Nice, 22-26 September 2008, pp. 717-722. New York: IEEE
24. Weir R, Mitchell M, Clark S, et al. The Intrinsic Hand-A 22 degree-of-freedom artificial hand-wrist replacement. In: MEC'08: measuring success in upper limb prosthetics: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/ powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 13-15 August 2008. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
25. Carrozza MC, Cappiello G, Micera S, et al. Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action. Biol Cybern 2006; 95(6): 629-644
26. Light CM, Chappell PH, Hudgins B, et al. Intelligent multifunction myoelectric control of hand prostheses. J Med Eng Technol 2002; 26(4): 139-146
27. Kuiken TA, Li G, Lock BA, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 2009; 301(6): 619-628
28. Englehart K and Hudgins B. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50(7): 848-854
29. Hargrove L, Losier Y, Lock B, et al. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 2007: 4842-4845
30. Lock BA, Schultz AE and Kuiken TA. Clinically practical applications of pattern recognition for myoelectric prostheses. In: MEC'08: measuring success in upper limb prosthetics: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/ powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 13-15 August 2008. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
31. Simon AM, Hargrove LJ, Lock BA, et al. Target achievement control test: evaluating real-time myoelectric patternrecognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48(6): 619-628
32. Wirta R, Taylor D and Finley F. Pattern recognition arm prosthesis: a historical perspective-A final report. Bull Prosthet Res 1978; Fall: 28
33. Alderson SW. Electrically operated artificial arm for abovethe- elbow amputee. US Patent 2580987, 1952
34. Graupe D. Control of upper limb prostheses in several degrees of freedom. Bull Prosthet Res 1972; Fall: 226-236
35. Graupe D, Beex AA, Monlux WJ, et al. A multifunctional prosthesis control system based on time series identification of EMG signals using microprocessors. Bull Prosthet Res 1977; 10(27): 4-16
36. Luzzio CC. Controlling an artificial arm with foot movements. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14(3): 207-212
37. Carrozza MC, Persichetti A, Laschi C, et al. A novel wearable interface for robotic hand prostheses. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Chicago, IL, 28 June-1 July 2005. New York: IEEE
38. Carrozza M, Persichetti A, Laschi C, et al. A wearable biomechatronic interface for controlling robots with voluntary foot movements. IEEE/ASME T Mech 2007; 12(1): 1-11
39. Cranny A, Cotton DPJ, Chappell PH, et al. Thick-film force and slip sensors for a prosthetic hand. Sensor Actuat A: Physical 2005; 123-124: 162-171
40. Dario P, Lazzarini R, Magni R, et al. An integrated miniature fingertip sensor. In: IEEE international symposium on micro machine and human science, Nagoya, Japan, 2-4 October 1996, pp. 91-97. New York: IEEE
41. Kyberd PJ and Chappell PH. The Southampton Hand: an intelligent myoelectric prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 1994; 31(4): 326-334
42. Ciprani F, Zaccone F, Micera S, et al. On the shared control of an EMG controlled prosthetic hand: analysis of user-prosthesis interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 2008; 24(1): 170-184
43. Huang H, Jiang L, Liu Y, et al. The mechanical design and experiments of HIT. In: Robotics and biomimetics, ROBIO'06: IEEE international conference, Kunming, China, 17-20 December 2006, pp. 896-901. New York:IEEE
44. Kargov A, Pylatiuk C, Oberle R, et al. Development of a multifunctional cosmetic prosthetic hand. In: 2007 IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Noordwijk, 13-15 June 2007, pp. 550-553. New York: IEEE
45. Zecca M, Cappiello G, Sebastiani S, et al. Experimental analysis of the proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensors of an underactuated prosthetic hand. Adv Rehabil Robot 2004; 306: 233-242
46. Dosen S, Cipriani C, Kostic M, et al. Cognitive vision system for control of dexterous prosthetic hands: experimental evaluation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010; 7: 42
47. Cipriani C, Controzzi M and Carrozza MC. The SmartHand transradial prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 29
48. Shanghai Kesheng Prostheses Co., Ltd. http://www.keshen. com/order-e.asp?key=Myoelectric%20Hands (accessed 21 May 2013)
49. Kyberd PJ, Lemaire ED, Scheme E, et al. Two-degree-offreedom powered prosthetic wrist. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48(6): 609-618
50. Troncossi M, Borghi C, Chiossi M, et al. Development of a prosthesis shoulder mechanism for upper limb amputees: application of an original design methodology to optimize functionality and wearability. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47(5): 523-531
51. Troncossi M, Gruppioni E, Chiossi M, et al. A novel electromechanical shoulder articulation for upper-limb prostheses: from the design to the first clinical application. J Prosthet Orthot 2009; 21(2): 79-90
52. Gruppioni E, Chiossi M, Troncossi M, et al. A new active shoulder prosthesis: from the design to the first clinical application. In: MEC'08: measuring success in upper limb prosthetics: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/ powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 13-15 August 2008. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
53. Cattaneo B, Casolo F and Camporsaragna M. An innovative shoulder complex with two active axes for artificial upper limbs. In: The proceedings of the 28th Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics Zurich, Switzerland. July 2001, p. 221
54. Troncossi M, Caminati R and Parenti-Castelli V. Determination of the design specifications of a powered humeral rotator for a myoelectric prosthesis. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2011; 225(5): 487-498
55. Weir RF and Grahn EG. Powered humeral rotator for persons with shoulder disarticulation amputations. In: MEC'05: integrating prosthetics and medicine: University of New Brunswick's myoelectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 17-19 August 2005. Fredericton, NB, Canada: University of New Brunswick
56. Losier Y, Englehart K and Hudgins B. Evaluation of shoulder complex motion-based input strategies for endpoint prosthetic- limb control using dual-task paradigm. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48(6): 669-678.