Evaluation of shoulder complex motion-based input strategies for endpoint prosthetic-limb control using dual-task paradigm

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 669-678

  Losier, Yves ^a   Englehart, Kevin ^a   Hudgins, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amputation; Dual task paradigm; Emg; Endpoint control; Myoelectric signals; Pattern recognition; Powered prostheses; Rehabilitation; Residual limb position; Shoulder motion

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; DUAL-TASKS; EMG; ENDPOINT CONTROL; MYOELECTRIC SIGNALS; POWERED PROSTHESES; RESIDUAL LIMB; SHOULDER MOTION;

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHETICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS;

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; CONTROL SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SHOULDER; SIGNAL PROCESSING; ARM MUSCLE; NOTE;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTRODES; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROFEEDBACK; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SHOULDER; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 79960761565     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0165     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;16(6):541-48. DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.08.006
2. Weed R, Atkins DJ. Return to work issues for the upper extremity amputee. In: Meier RH, Atkins DJ, editors. Functional restoration of adults and children with upper extremity amputation. New York (NY): Demos Medical Publishing; 2004. p. 337-52.
3. Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science. 2002;296(5574): 1829-32. DOI:10.1126/science.1070291
4. Zhou R, Jiang N, Englehart K, Parker P. A computational model and simulation study of the efferent activity in the brachial nerves during voluntary motor intent. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48(1):67-77.
5. Lake C, Miguelez JM. Evolution of microprocessor based control systems in upper extremity prosthetics. Technol Disabil. 2003;15(2):63-71.
6. Lake C, Miguelez JM. Comparative analysis of microprocessors in upper limb prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot. 2003;15(2): 48-65. DOI:10.1097/00008526-200304000-00004
7. Miguelez JM. Critical factors in electrically powered upper-extremity prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot. 2002;14(1): 36-38. DOI:10.1097/00008526-200203000-00010
8. Buerkle VR. Advanced pattern recognition concepts for an artificial shoulder [master's thesis]. [Fredericton (Canada)]: University of New Brunswick; 2006. 115 p.
9. Doubler JA, Childress DS. An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1984;21(1):5-18.
10. Simpson DC, Kenworthy G. The design of a complete arm prosthesis. Biomed Eng. 1973;8(2):56-59.
11. Storey N. Control of an arm prosthesis [dissertation]. [Southampton (UK)]: University of Southampton; 1977.
12. Au AT, Kirsch RF. EMG-based prediction of shoulder and elbow kinematics in able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(4):471-80. DOI:10.1109/86.895950
13. Jones B, Kyberd P. Improved control for an artificial arm. Proceedings of the MEC'05 Myoelectric Controls Symposium; 2005 Aug 17-19; Fredericton, Canada. p. 112-16. Available from: http://openprosthetics.org/literature/91/mec05.
14. uerkle VR, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Pattern recognition of single and combined motions from the shoulder complex. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2006 Aug 30-Sep 3; New York City, NY. p. 3419-22.
15. Englehart K, Hudgins B. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50(7):848-54. DOI:10.1109/TBME.2003.813539
16. Hudgins B, Parker P, Scott RN. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993; 40(1):82-94. DOI:10.1109/10.204774
17. Huang Y, Englehart KB, Hudgins B, Chan AD. A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52(11):1801-11. DOI:10.1109/TBME.2005.856295
18. Losier Y, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Residual shoulder motion vector projection. Proceedings of the 31st Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society Conference; 2008 Jun 11-13; Montreal, Canada.
19. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994;116(2):220-44. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
20. Li G, Kuiken TA. Modeling of prosthetic limb rotation control by sensing rotation of residual arm bone. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(9):2134-42. DOI:10.1109/TBME.2008.923914
21. Kang WJ, Shiu JR, Cheng CK, Lai JS, Tsao HW, Kuo TS. The effect of electrode arrangement on spectral distance measures for discrimination of EMG signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(10):1020-23. DOI:10.1109/10.634653
22. Losier Y, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Residual shoulder motion MES classifier. Proceedings of the 30th Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society Conference; 2007 Jun 16-19; Toronto, Canada.
23. Haggard P, Cockburn J. Concurrent performance of cognitive and motor tasks in neurological rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998;8(2):155-70. DOI:10.1080/713755565
24. Haggard P, Cockburn J, Cock J, Fordham C, Wade D. Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69(4):479-86. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.69.4.479