Controlling an Artificial Arm with Foot Movements

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 207-212

  Luzzio, Christopher C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Control methods; Prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROL SYSTEM; FOOT; HUMAN; LEG MOVEMENT; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE TRAINING; ROBOTICS; SENSOR;

AMPUTATION; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTRODES; FOOT; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; ROBOTICS;

EID: 0033732950     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154596830001400306     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Carlson LE Yeung QS. The Mechanics of dual-control above-elbow prostheses. Ann Biomed Eng 1975; 3: 1–12.
2. van Lunteren A van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH Stassen HG, et al. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 141–51.
3. Seamone W. Development and evaluation of externally powered upper-limb prosthesis. Bull Prosth Res 1970; 10: 57–63.
4. Peizer E Wright DW Pirrello T Jr, et al. Current indications for upper-extremity powered components. Bull Prosth Res 1970; 10: 22–42.
5. Trefler E. A comparison of control systems for upper extremity prosthetics. Can Occup Ther 1972; 39: 73–85.
6. Parker PA Scott RN. Myoelectric control of prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1986; 13: 283–310.
7. Jacobsen SC Knutti DF Johnson RT, et al. Development of the Utah artificial arm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1982; 29: 249–69.
8. Childress DS Bullock JN. An experiment with the control of a hybrid prosthetic system: Electric elbow, body-powered hook. Bull Prosth Res 1970; 10: 62–77.
9. Graupe D. Control of upper-limb prostheses in several degrees of freedom. Bull Prosth Res 1974;Fall:226–36.
10. Richard PD Gander RE Parker PA, et al. Multistate myoelectric control: The feasibility of 5-state-control J Rehabil R&D 1982; 20: 84–6.
11. Doubler JA Childress DS. Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. J Rehabil R&D 1984; 21: 19–31.
12. Gibbons DT O'Riain MD Philippe-Auguste S. An above-elbow prosthesis employing programmed linkages. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987; 34: 493–8.
13. Seamone W Schmeisser G, Status of the Johns Hopkins Research Program on upper limb prosthesis-orthosis power and control system. Bull Prosth Res 1974;Fall:237–44.
14. Swain ID Nightingale JM. An adaptive control system for a complete hand/arm prosthesis. J Biomed Eng 1980; 2: 163–6.
15. Kyberd PJ Chappell P. The Southamptom Hand: An intelligent myoelectric prosthesis. J Rehabil R&D 1994; 31: 326–4.
16. Prior RE Lyman J. Electrocutaneous feedback for artificial limbs. Bull Prosth Res 1975;Fall:3–37.
17. Scott RN. Feedback in myoelectric prostheses. Clin Orthop 1990; 256: 58–63.
18. Stein RB Charles D Hoffer JA, et al. New approaches for the control of powered prostheses particularly by high-level amputees. Bull Prosth Res 1980; 17: 51–62.
19. Stein RB Charles D Walley M. Bioelectric control of powered limbs for amputees. Adv Neurol 1983; 39: 1093–193.
20. Nirenberg LM Hanley J Stear EB. A new approach to prosthetic control: EEG motor signal tracking with an adaptively designed phase-locked loop. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1971; 18: 389–98.
21. Schmidt EM. Single neuron recording from motor cortex as a possible source of signals for control of external devices. Ann Biomed Eng 1980: 8: 339–49.
22. Hoffer JA Loeb GE. Implantable electrical and mechanical interfaces with nerve and muscle. Ann Biomed Eng 1980; 8: 351–60.
23. Kovacs GT Storment CW Halks-Miller M, et al. Silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays for parallel recording of neural activity in peripheral and cranial nerves. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994; 41: 567–76.
24. Law HT. Engineering of upper limb prostheses. Orthop Clin North Am 1981; 12: 929–51.
25. Millstein SG Heiger H Hunter GA. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: A comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthet Orthop Int 1986; 10: 27–34.
26. Jebsen RH Talor N Trieshmann RB, et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 311–9.
27. Wise S Gardner W Sabelman E, et al. Evaluation of a fiber optic glove for semi-automated goniometric measurements. J Rehabil R&D 1990; 27: 411–24.
28. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Notice; Part II. 1998; 63: 10427–37.
29. Malone JM Fleming LL Roberson J, et al. Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil R&D 1984; 21: 33–41.
30. Leonard JA Jr Esquenazi A Fisher SV, et al. Prosthetics, orthotics, and assistive devices: 1. General concepts. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 195–201.