Enhanced deacidification activity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe by genome shuffling

Yeast

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 317-325

  Ding, Su ^a   Zhang, Ying ^b   Zhang, Jing ^b   Zeng, Wei ^a   Yang, Ying ^b   Guan, Jingxi ^b   Pan, Lixia ^c   Li, Wei ^b  

^a GUANGXI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER FOR NON FOOD BIOREFINERY   (China)

^c Guangxi Mangrove Research Center   (China)

Author keywords

Deacidification activity; Genome shuffling; Malo alcoholic fermentation; Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Vitis quinquangularis Rehd

Indexed keywords

BROMOCRESOL GREEN; MALIC ACID; MALIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ACIDIFICATION; ARTICLE; BREEDING METHOD; CELL REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION PROCESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEACIDIFICATION ACTIVITY; ENZYME INACTIVATION; FERMENTATION; GENE ACTIVITY; GENETIC STABILITY; GENETIC STRAIN; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOME SHUFFLING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOPLAST; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION; VITIS; VITIS QUINQUANGULARIS; WINE; CHEMISTRY; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; VITIS QUINQUANGULARIS;

FERMENTATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; MALATES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; VITIS; WINE;

EID: 84921668362     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3053     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agouridis N, Bekatorou A, Nigam P, Kanellaki M. 2005. Malolactic fermentation in wine with Lactobacillus casei cells immobilized on delignified cellulosic material. J Agric Food Chem 53: 2546-2551.
2. Bajwa PK, Pinel D, Martin VJ, et al. 2010. Strain improvement of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis by genome shuffling. J Microbiol Methods 81: 179-186.
3. Ciani M. 1995. Continuous deacidification of wine by immobilized Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells: evaluation of malic acid degradation rate and analytical profiles. J Appl Microbiol 79: 631-634.
4. Ciani M, Comitini F. 2011. Non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts have a promising role in biotechnological approaches to winemaking. Ann Microbiol 61: 25-32.
5. Dai MH, Ziesman S, Ratcliffe T, et al. 2005. Visualization of protoplast fusion and quantitation of recombination in fused protoplasts of auxotrophic strains of Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 7: 45-52.
6. du Toit M, Engelbrecht L, Lerm E, Krieger-Weber S. 2011. Lactobacillus: the next generation of malolactic fermentation starter cultures - an overview. Food Bioprocess Tech 4: 876-906.
7. Gao C, Fleet G. 1995. Degradation of malic and tartaric acids by high density cell suspensions of wine yeasts. Food Microbiol 12: 65-71.
8. Ge JP, Sun HB, Song G, et al. 2012. A genome shuffling-generated Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate that ferments xylose and glucose to produce high levels of ethanol. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39: 777-787.
9. Giudici P, Zambonelli C, Passarelli P, Castellari L. 1995. Improvement of wine composition with cryotolerant Saccharomyces strains. Am J Enol Viticult 46: 143-147.
10. Gong J, Zheng H, Wu Z, et al. 2009. Genome shuffling: progress and applications for phenotype improvement. Biotechnol Adv 27: 996-1005.
11. Hida H, Yamada T, Yamada Y. 2007. Genome shuffling of Streptomyces sp. U121 for improved production of hydroxycitric acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73: 1387-1393.
12. Hong S, Lee H, Park H, et al. 2010. Degradation of malic acid in wine by immobilized Issatchenkia orientalis cells with oriental oak charcoal and alginate. Lett Appl Microbiol 50: 522-529.
13. Hou L. 2009. Novel methods of genome shuffling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 31: 671-677.
14. John RP, Gangadharan D, Madhavan Nampoothiri K. 2008. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus delbrueckii mutant and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens through protoplasmic fusion for l-lactic acid production from starchy wastes. Bioresource Technol 99: 8008-8015.
15. Liu SQ. 2002. Malolactic fermentation in wine - beyond deacidification. J Appl Microbiol 92: 589-601.
16. Luo JM, Li JS, Liu D, et al. 2012. Genome shuffling of Streptomyces gilvosporeus for improving natamycin production. J Agr Food Chem 60: 6026-6036.
17. Mok C, Song KT, Park YS, et al. 2006. High hydrostatic pressure pasteurization of red wine. J Food Sci 71: M265-269.
18. Pinel D, D'Aoust F, del Cardayre SB, et al. 2011. Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome shuffling through recursive population mating leads to improved tolerance to spent sulfite liquor. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 4736-4743.
19. Pozo-Bayón M, G-Alegría E, Polo M, et al. 2005. Wine volatile and amino acid composition after malolactic fermentation: effect of Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum starter cultures. J Agr Food Chem 53: 8729-8735.
20. Rodríguez-Nogales JM, Vila-Crespo J, Fernández-Fernández E. 2013. Immobilization of Oenococcus oeni in Lentikats® to develop malolactic fermentation in wines. Biotechnol Progr 29: 60-65.
21. Schwartz H, Radler F. 1988. Formation of l-malate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 27: 553-560.
22. Silva S, Ramón-Portugal F, Andrade P, et al. 2003. Malic acid consumption by dry immobilized cells of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Am J Enol Viticult 54: 50-55.
23. Sumby KM, Jiranek V, Grbin PR. 2013. Ester synthesis and hydrolysis in an aqueous environment, and strain specific changes during malolactic fermentation in wine with Oenococcus oeni. Food Chem 141: 1673-1680.
24. Ugliano M, Genovese A, Moio L. 2003. Hydrolysis of wine aroma precursors during malolactic fermentation with four commercial starter cultures of Oenococcus oeni. J Agr Food Chem 51: 5073-5078.
25. Volschenk H, Viljoen M, Grobler J, et al. 1997. Engineering pathways for malate degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 15: 253-257.
26. Wang YH, Li Y, Pei XL, et al. 2007. Genome-shuffling improved acid tolerance and l-lactic acid volumetric productivity in Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J Biotechnol 129: 510-515.
27. Xu B, Jin ZH, Jin QC, et al. 2009. Improvement of pristinamycin production by genome shuffling and medium optimization for Streptomyces pristinaespiralis. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng 14: 175-179.
28. Zhao K, Ping WX, Zhang LN, et al. 2008. Screening and breeding of high taxol producing fungi by genome shuffling. Sci China Life Sci 51: 222-231.
29. Zhao M, Dai CC, Guan XY, Tao J. 2009. Genome shuffling amplifies the carbon source spectrum and improves arachidonic acid production in Diasporangium sp. Enzym Microb Tech 45: 419-425.
30. Zheng DQ, Wu XC, Wang PM, et al. 2011. Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38: 415-422.