Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 415-422

  Zheng, Dao Qiong ^a   Wu, Xue Chang ^a   Wang, Pin Mei ^a   Chi, Xiao Qin ^a   Tao, Xiang Lin ^a   Li, Ping ^a   Jiang, Xin Hang ^a   Zhao, Yu Hua ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acetic acid; Ethanol fermentation; Genome shuffling; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ACID TOLERANCE; ACIDITY; ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOME SHUFFLING; IN VIVO STUDY; LIQUID CULTURE; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; ANTIFUNGAL RESISTANCE; CULTURE MEDIUM; DNA SHUFFLING; DRUG EFFECT; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROBIOLOGY; PH;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ACETIC ACID; CULTURE MEDIA; DNA SHUFFLING; DRUG RESISTANCE, FUNGAL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, FUNGAL; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC;

EID: 79955718565     PISSN: 13675435     EISSN: 14765535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0784-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abbott DA, Knijnenburg TA, de Poorter LMI, Reinders MJT, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA (2007) Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 7(6):819-833 (Pubitemid 47256357)
2. Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M (2008) Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 26(1):89-105 (Pubitemid 350141683)
3. Bracey D, Holyoak CD, Nebe-von Caron G, Coote PJ (1998) Determination of the intracellular pH (pH(i)) of growing cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the effect of reduced-expression of the membrane H+-ATPase. J Microbiol Meth 31(3):113-125 (Pubitemid 28083414)
4. Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES, Young RA (2001) Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 12(2):323-337 (Pubitemid 33051578)
5. Chen AK, Gelling C, Rogers PL, Dawes IW, Rosche B (2009) Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to stress-free acidification. J Microbiol 47(1):1-8
6. Coyle JT, Puttfarcken P (1993) Oxidative stress, glutamate, and neurodegenerative disorders. Science 262(5134):689-695 (Pubitemid 23350687)
7. Dai MH, Ziesman S, Ratcliffe T, Gill RT, Copley SD (2005) Visualization of protoplast fusion and quantitation of recombination in fused protoplasts of auxotrophic strains of Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 7(1):45-52 (Pubitemid 40249907)
8. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH (2007) High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2(1):31-34 (Pubitemid 47040065)
9. Graves T, Narendranath NV, Dawson K, Power R (2006) Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33(6):469-474
10. Graves T, Narendranath NV, Dawson K, Power R (2007) Interaction effects of lactic acid and acetic acid at different temperatures on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash. Appl Microbiol Biotecnol 73(5):1190-1196 (Pubitemid 44974330)
11. Guldener U, Heck S, Fiedler T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH (1996) A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24(13):2519-2524 (Pubitemid 26237149)
12. Hida H, Yamada T, Yamada Y (2007) Genome shuffling of Streptomyces sp. U121 for improved production of hydroxycitric acid. Appl Microbiol Biotecnol 73(6):1387-1393
13. Hou L (2009) Novel methods of genome shuffling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 31(5):671-677
14. Kai Z, Ping WX, Lina ZN, Jun L, Yan L, Tao J, Zhou DP (2008) Screening and breeding of high taxol producing fungi by genome shuffling. Sci China C Life Sci 51(3):222-231
15. Kawahata M, Masaki K, Fujii T, Iefuji H (2006) Yeast genes involved in response to lactic acid and acetic acid: acidic conditions caused by the organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures induce expression of intracellular metal metabolism genes regulated by Aft1p. FEMS Yeast Res 6(6):924-936
16. Liu ZL (2006) Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Appl Microbiol Biotecnol 73(1):27-36
17. Ludovico P, Sousa MJ, Silva MT, Leao C, Corte-Real M (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae commits to a programmed cell death process in response to acetic acid. Microbiology 147:2409-2415 (Pubitemid 32899237)
18. Mollapour M, Piper PW (2006) Hog1p mitogen-activated protein kinase determines acetic acid resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 6(8):1274-1280 (Pubitemid 44800324)
19. Mollapour M, Piper PW (2007) Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol Cell Biol 27(18):6446-6456 (Pubitemid 47435750)
20. Montooth KL, Siebenthall KT, Clark AG (2006) Membrane lipid physiology and toxin catabolism underlie ethanol and acetic acid tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 209(Pt 19):3837-3850 (Pubitemid 44682347)
21. Nakazawa N, Iwano K (2004) Efficient selection of hybrids by protoplast fusion using drug resistance markers and reporter genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 98(5):353-358 (Pubitemid 40013201)
22. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (2001) Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26(3):171-177 (Pubitemid 32336867)
23. Otte B, Grunwaldt E, Mahmoud O, Jennewein S (2009) Genome shuffling in Clostridium diolis DSM 15410 for improved 1, 3-propanediol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(24):7610-7616
24. Pampulha ME, Loureirodias MC (1989) Combined effect of acetic-acid, pH and ethanol on intracellular pH of fermenting yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotecnol 31(5-6):547-550
25. Piper P, Mahe Y, Thompson S, Pandjaitan R, Holyoak C, Egner R, Muhlbauer M, Coote P, Kuchler K (1998) The Pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast. EMBO J 17(15):4257-4265 (Pubitemid 28362616)
26. Portillo F, Serrano R (1989) Growth-control strength and activesite of yeast plasma-membrane ATPase studied by site-directed mutagenesis. Eur J Biochem 186(3):501-507 (Pubitemid 20030099)
27. Serrano R (1984) Plasma-membrane ATPase of fungi and plants as a novel type of proton pump. Curr Top Cell Regul 23:87-126
28. Shi DJ, Wang CL, Wang KM (2009) Genome shuffling to improve thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36(1):139-147
29. Viegas CA, Almeida PF, Cavaco M, Sa-Correia I (1998) The H(+)-ATPase in the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated during growth latency in octanoic acid-supplemented medium accompanying the decrease in intracellular pH and cell viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(2):779-783 (Pubitemid 28079858)
30. Wei P, Li Z, He P, Lin Y, Jiang N (2008) Genome shuffling in the ethanologenic yeast Candida krusei to improve acetic acid tolerance. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 49(2):113-120 (Pubitemid 351271074)
31. + and pH homeostasis: implications for salt tolerance, cell wall integrity and cell cycle progression. EMBO J 21(5):920-929
32. Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WP, del Cardayre SB (2002) Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature 415(6872):644-646 (Pubitemid 34136391)