Mean of the typical decoding rates: A New translation efficiency index based on the analysis of ribosome profiling data

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 73-80

  Dana, Alexandra ^a   Tuller, Tamir ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Codon decoding rate; Codon usage bias; Gene translation; Ribosome profiling; Transcript evolution

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN; CODON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CODON; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MEAN OF TYPICAL DECODING RATE; MUS MUSCULUS; OPEN READING FRAME; RIBOSOME; RNA ANALYSIS; RNA GENE; RNA TRANSLATION; TRANSLATION ELONGATION EFFICIENCY; ANIMAL; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CODON; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMANS; MICE; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RIBOSOMES; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84921535542     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.015099     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brar, G. A., M. Yassour, N. Friedman, A. Regev, N. T. Ingolia et al., 2012 High-resolution view of the yeast meiotic program revealed by ribosome profiling, Science 335, 552-557.
2. Chamary, J. V., J. L. Parmley, and L. D. Hurst, 2006 Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 98-108.
3. Charlesworth, B., 2009 Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 195-205.
4. Chi, B. K., K. Gronau, U. Mader, B. Hessling, D. Becher et al., 2011 S-bacillithiolation protects against hypochlorite stress in Bacillus subtilis as revealed by transcriptomics and redox proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10: M111 009506.
5. Chu, D., E. Kazana, N. Bellanger, T. Singh, M. F. Tuite et al., 2014 Translation elongation can control translation initiation on eu-karyotic mRNAs. EMBO J. 33: 21-34.
6. Dana, A., and T. Tuller, 2012 Determinants of translation elongation speed and ribosomal profiling biases in mouse embryonic stem cells. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8: e1002755.
7. Dana, A., and T. Tuller, 2014 The effect of tRNA levels on decoding times of mRNA codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: 9171-9181.
8. dos Reis, M., R. Savva, and L. Wernisch, 2004 Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 5036-5044.
9. dos Reis, M., and L. Wernisch, 2009 Estimating translational selection in eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 451-461.
10. Engstrom, P. G., T. Steijger, B. Sipos, G. R. Grant, A. Kahles et al., 2013 Systematic evaluation of spliced alignment programs for RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 10: 1185-1191.
11. Fluitt, A., E. Pienaar, and H. Viljoen, 2007 Ribosome kinetics and aa-tRNA competition determine rate and fidelity of peptide synthesis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 31: 335-346.
12. Fox, J. M., and I. Erill, 2010 Relative codon adaptation: a generic codon bias index for prediction of gene expression. DNA Res. 17: 185-196.
13. Gerashchenko, M. V., and V. N. Gladyshev, 2015 Translation inhibitors cause abnormalities in ribosome profiling experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: e134.
14. Ghaemmaghami, S., W. K. Huh, K. Bower, R. W. Howson, A. Belle et al., 2003 Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425: 737-741.
15. Guo, H., N. T. Ingolia, J. S. Weissman, and D. P. Bartel, 2010 Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels, Nature 466, 835-840.
16. Hershberg, R., and D. A. Petrov, 2008 Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 287-299.
17. Ingolia, N. T., 2010 Genome-wide translational profiling by ribosome footprinting. Methods Enzymol. 470: 119-142.
18. Ingolia, N. T., S. Ghaemmaghami, J. R. Newman, and J. S. Weissman, 2009 Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324: 218-223.
19. Ingolia, N. T., L. F. Lareau, and J. S. Weissman, 2011 Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 147: 789-802.
20. Kemp, A. J., R. Betney, L. Ciandrini, A. C. Schwenger, M. C. Romano et al., 2013 A yeast tRNA mutant that causes pseudohyphal growth exhibits reduced rates of CAG codon translation. Mol. Microbiol. 87: 284-300.
21. Kendall, M., and A. Stuart, 1979 The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Vol. 2, Ed. 1. Inference and Relationship. Griffin, London.
22. Kirienko, N. V., and D. S. Fay, 2007 Transcriptome profiling of the C. elegans Rb ortholog reveals diverse developmental roles. Dev. Biol. 305: 674-684.
23. Kudla, G., A. W. Murray, D. Tollervey, and J. B. Plotkin, 2009 Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324: 255-258.
24. Lee, M. V., S. E. Topper, S. L. Hubler, J. Hose, C. D. Wenger et al., 2011 A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7: 514.
25. Lee, S., B. Liu, S. X. Huang, B. Shen, S. B. Qian et al., 2012 Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, E2424-E2432.
26. Letzring, D. P., K. M. Dean, and E. J. Grayhack, 2010 Control of translation efficiency in yeast by codon-anticodon interactions. RNA 16: 2516-2528.
27. Li, G. W., E. Oh, and J. S. Weissman, 2012 The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature 484: 538-541.
28. Newman, J. R., S. Ghaemmaghami, J. Ihmels, D. K. Breslow, M. Noble et al., 2006 Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441: 840-846.
29. Nicolas, P., U. Mader, E. Dervyn, T. Rochat, A. Leduc et al., 2012 Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science 335: 1103-1106.
30. Plotkin, J. B., and G. Kudla, 2011 Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12: 32-42.
31. Qian, W., J. R. Yang, N. M. Pearson, C. Maclean, and J. Zhang, 2012 Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002603.
32. Rocha, E. P., 2004 Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization. Genome Res. 14: 2279-2286.
33. Sabi, R., and T. Tuller, 2014 Modelling the efficiency of codon-tRNA interactions based on codon usage bias. DNA Res. 21: 511-526.
34. Sauna, Z. E., and C. Kimchi-Sarfaty, 2011 Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12: 683-691.
35. Seber, G. A., and A. J. Lee, 2012 Linear Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
36. Sharp, P. M., and W. H. Li, 1987 The codon Adaptation Index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 1281-1295.
37. Stadler, M., K. Artiles, J. Pak, and A. Fire, 2012 Contributions of mRNA abundance, ribosome loading, and post- or peri-translational effects to temporal repression of C. elegans heterochronic miRNA targets, Genome Res. 22, 2418-2426. doi: 2410.1101/gr.136515.136111. Epub 132012 Aug 136511.
38. Taniguchi, Y., P. J. Choi, G. W. Li, H. Chen, M. Babu et al., 2010 Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329: 533-538.
39. Tuller, T., A. Carmi, K. Vestsigian, S. Navon, Y. Dorfan et al., 2010a An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141: 344-354.
40. Tuller, T., Y. Y. Waldman, M. Kupiec, and E. Ruppin, 2010b Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 3645-3650.
41. Tuller, T., and H. Zur, 2014 Multiple Roles of the Coding Sequence 5' End in Gene Expression Regulation. To appear in Nucleic Acids Res.
42. Vizcaino, J. A., R. G. Cote, A. Csordas, J. A. Dianes, A. Fabregat et al., 2013 The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: D1063-D1069.
43. Wang, Y., C. L. Liu, J. D. Storey, R. J. Tibshirani, D. Herschlag et al., 2002 Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 5860-5865.
44. Wright, F., 1990 The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 87: 23-29.