Normative values in esophageal high-resolution manometry

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 175-187

  Herregods, T V K ^a   Roman, S ^b   Kahrilas, P J ^c   Smout, A J P M ^a   Bredenoord, A J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

High resolution manometry; Normal values; Reproducibility; Solid state manometry; Technical aspects; Water perfused manometry

Indexed keywords

BODY POSITION; CATHETER; ESOPHAGUS HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SWALLOWING; DEVICES; ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS; MANOMETRY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS; HUMANS; MANOMETRY;

EID: 84921511767     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12500     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Committee AT, Wang A, Pleskow DK, Banerjee S, Barth BA, Bhat YM, Desilets DJ, Gottlieb KT et al. Esophageal function testing. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 231-43.
2. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290: G1033-40.
3. Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak P, Brasseur JG, Ghosh S, Thumshirn M, Fried M, Schwizer W. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 533-42.
4. Pandolfino JE, Sifrim D. Evaluation of esophageal contractile propagation using esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl. 1): 20-6.
5. Smout AJ. Manometry of the gastrointestinal tract: toy or tool? Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2001; 234: 22-8.
6. Bredenoord AJ, Hebbard GS. Technical aspects of clinical high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl. 1): 5-10.
7. Capovilla G, Salvador R, Savarino E, Nicoletti L, Zaninotto G, Costantini M. Comparative Assessment of Tolerability, Duration and Costs Of Solid-State vs. Water-perfused System for Esophageal Motility Testing - Data from a Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Crossover Study. Digestive Disease Week; 03/05/2014; Chicago, 2014.
8. Kessing BF, Weijenborg PW, Smout AJ, Hillenius S, Bredenoord AJ. Water-perfused esophageal high-resolution manometry: normal values and validation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014; 306: G491-5.
9. De Schepper HU, Kessing BF, Weijenborg PW, Oors JM, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Impact of spatial resolution on results of esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 922-8.
10. Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Reproducibility of esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: e271-6.
11. Singh ER, Rife C, Clayton S, Naas P, Nietert P, Castell DO. Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: e12-6.
12. Hernandez JC, Ratuapli SK, Burdick GE, Dibaise JK, Crowell MD. Interrater and intrarater agreement of the Chicago classification of achalasia subtypes using high-resolution esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 207-14.
13. Weijenborg PW, Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 654-9.
14. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290: G988-97.
15. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Kahrilas PJ. Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 291: G525-31.
16. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek M, Kahrilas PJ. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G878-85.
17. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 27-37.
18. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl. 1): 57-65.
19. Capovilla G, Savarino E, Costantini M, Nicoletti L, Zaninotto G, Salvador R. Inter-Rater and Inter-Device Agreement For The Diagnosis of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders based on Chicago Classification Between Solid-State and Water-Perfused HRM System A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Crossover Study. Digestive Disease Week; 03/05/2014; Chicago, 2014.
20. Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A, Kawami N, Hoshino S, Takenouchi N, Hosaka H, Shimoyama Y et al. Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; doi: 10.1111/nmo.12446 [Epub ahead of print].
21. Niebisch S, Wilshire CL, Peters JH. Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high-resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26: 651-60.
22. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 509-e198.
23. Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodeme F, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: e509-16.
24. Lee J, Anggiansah A, Anggiansah R, Young A, Wong T, Fox M. Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1392-8.
25. Pandolfino JE, El-Serag HB, Zhang Q, Shah N, Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ. Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 639-49.
26. Vega KJ, Langford-Legg T, Jamal MM. Ethnic variation in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and length. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 655-9.
27. Kumar N, Porter RF, Chanin JM, Gyawali CP. Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 375-81.
28. Roman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 349-56.
29. Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Sensation of stasis is poorly correlated with impaired esophageal bolus transport. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 538-45.
30. Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls and patients with dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: e364-72.
31. Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25: 762-e579.
32. Zavala-Solares MR, Saleme E, Vargas-Vorackova F, Valdovinos MA. Sa1191 high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) in asymptomatic volunteers. a comparative study between solid-state and water-perfused systems. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: S-239.
33. Shaker R, Ren J, Xie P, Lang IM, Bardan E, Sui Z. Characterization of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in humans. Am J Physiol 1997; 273(4 Pt 1): G854-8.
34. Ortiz V, Poppele G, Alonso N, Castellano C, Garrigues V. Evaluation of esophagogastric junction relaxation by 4-second integrated relaxation pressure in achalasia using high resolution manometry with water-perfused catheters. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 16: 1551-6.
35. Shi Y, Xiao Y, Peng S, Lin J, Xiong L, Chen M. Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 1611-5.
36. Gao F, Gao Y, Hobson A, Huang W, Shang Z. Normal esophageal high-resolution manometry and impedance values in the supine and sitting positions in the population of Northern China. Dis Esophagus. 2014; in press. doi: 10.1111/dote.12320.
37. Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell DO, Tutuian R. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1198-205.
38. Xiao Y, Nicodeme F, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE. Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: e489-96.
39. Roman S, Damon H, Pellissier PE, Mion F. Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: 271-5.
40. Sears VW Jr, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 857-64.
41. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut 2008; 57: 405-23.
42. Blonski W, Vela M, Hila A, Castell DO. Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 155-60.
43. Xiang X, Tu L, Zhang X, Xie X, Hou X. Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26: 661-7.
44. Lu C, Luger D, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Kwiatek MA. Comparison of normative values obtained with the standard and small diameter sierra solid-state high-resolution manometric assemblies for assessment of esophageal function in adults. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: S-230-S-1.
45. Singendonk MM, Kritas S, Cock C, Ferris L, McCall L, Rommel N, van Wijk MP, Benninga MA et al. Applying the Chicago Classification criteria of esophageal motility to a pediatric cohort: effects of patient age and size. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 1333-41.
46. Goldani HA, Staiano A, Borrelli O, Thapar N, Lindley KJ. Pediatric esophageal high-resolution manometry: utility of a standardized protocol and size-adjusted pressure topography parameters. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 460-7.