Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry

Diseases of the Esophagus

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 661-667

  Xiang, X ^a   Tu, L ^a   Zhang, X ^a   Xie, X ^a   Hou, X ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Catheter diameter; Esophageal motility; High resolution manometry

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; CATHETER DIAMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETER; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MALE; MUSCLE RELAXATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID STATE; SOLID STATE HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; SWALLOWING; UPPER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; VOLUNTEER; WEIGHT, MASS AND SIZE;

CATHETER DIAMETER; ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY; HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CATHETERS; DEGLUTITION; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PERISTALSIS; PRESSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884712704     PISSN: 11208694     EISSN: 14422050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dote.12029     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Biancani P, Zabinski M P, Behar J. Pressure tension, and force of closure of the human lower esophageal sphincter and esophagus. J Clin Invest 1975; 56: 476-483.
2. Jakubowicz M, Wienbeck M, Barnert J. Device dependent problems in esophageal manometry. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36 (9): 25S-28.
3. Lydon S B, Dodds W J, Hogan W J, Arndorfer R C. The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording. Am J Dig Dis 1975; 20: 968-970.
4. Vakil N, van Zanten S V, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900-1920. quiz 43.
5. Kahrilas P J, Ghosh S K, Pandolfino J E. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 627-635.
6. Pandolfino J E, Fox M R, Bredenoord A J, Kahrilas P J. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21: 796-806.
7. Pandolfino J E, Ghosh S K, Rice J, Clarke J O, Kwiatek M A, Kahrilas P J. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103 (1): 27-37.
8. Pandolfino J E, Ghosh S K, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas P J. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290 (5): G1033-1040.
9. Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S etal. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17 (1): 48-53.
10. Aanen M C, Bredenoord A J, Numans M E, Samson M, Smout A J. Reproducibility of symptom association analysis in ambulatory reflux monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2200-2208.
11. Bredenoord A J, Weusten B L, Timmer R, Smout A J. Reproducibility of multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 265-269.