Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 375-381

  Kumar, Nitin ^a   Porter, Ryan F ^a   Chanin, Jake M ^a   Gyawali, C Prakash ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

esophageal hypomotility; high resolution manometry; intersegmental trough; latency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ESOPHAGUS FUNCTION DISORDER; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS PARAMETERS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HIGH RESOLUTION ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERSEGMENTAL TROUGH; INTERSEGMENTAL TROUGH LENGTH; LATENT PERIOD; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTION; SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTION PROXIMAL LATENCY; SWALLOWING;

ADULT; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; PERISTALSIS;

EID: 84859911478     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: 15392031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823d3403     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic wave. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:G677-G684.
2. Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, et al. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2720-2730.
3. Clouse RE, Prakash C. Topographic esophageal manometry: an emerging clinical and investigative approach. Digestive Diseases. 2000;18:64-74.
4. Clouse RE, Parks TR, Haroian LR. Novel solid-state technology simplifies high-resolution manometry (HRM) for clinical use. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(suppl 2):A638.
5. Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal motor disorders in terms of highresolution esophageal pressure topography: what has changed? Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:981-987.
6. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut. 2008;57:405-423. (Pubitemid 351288108)
7. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, et al. Oesophageal peristaltic transition zone defects: real but few and far between. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:1283-1290.
8. Ghosh SK, Janiak P, FoxM, et al. Physiology of the oesophageal transition zone in the presence of chronic bolus retention: studies using concurrent high resolution manometry and digital fluoroscopy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:750-759. (Pubitemid 351814392)
9. Pohl D, Ribolsi M, Savarino E, et al. Characteristics of the esophageal low-pressure zone in healthy volunteers and patients with esophageal symptoms: assessment by high resolution manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2544-2549.
10. Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, et al. Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106:443-451.
11. Lord RV, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, et al. Hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence, and effectiveness of Nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:602-610.
12. Frazzoni M, Savarino E, Manno M, et al. Reflux patterns in short segment Barrett's esophagus: a study using impedance pH monitoring on and off PPI therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:508-515.
13. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of normal and highamplitude esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol. 1993;265: G1098-G1107. (Pubitemid 24023540)
14. Imam H, Shay S, Ali A, et al. Bolus transit patterns in healthy subjects: a study using simultaneous impedance monitoring, videoesophagram, and esophageal manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;288:G1000-G1006. (Pubitemid 40563143)
15. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, et al. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:174-182. (Pubitemid 37248067)
16. Bulsiewicz WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Kwiatek MA, et al. Esophageal pressure topography indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high resolution impedance manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2721-2728.
17. Clouse RE, Alrakawi A, Staiano A. Intersubject and interswallow variability in topography of esophageal motility. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:1978-1985.
18. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Anggiansah R, et al. Inclusion of solid swallows and a test meal increase the diagnostic yield of high resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(suppl 1):S77[abs].
19. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:73-80. (Pubitemid 18029762)
20. Skandalakis JE, Ellis H. Embryologic and anatomic basis of esophageal surgery. Surg Clin N Am. 2000;80:85-155. (Pubitemid 30070789)
21. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:209-224. (Pubitemid 40039972)
22. Leite LP, Johnston BT, Barrett J, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42: 1859-1865. (Pubitemid 27433533)