Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2012, Pages e489-e496

  Xiao, Y ^a,b   Nicodeme F ^a,c   Kahrilas, P J ^a   Roman, S ^a,d   Lin, Z ^a   Pandolfino, J E ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Body position; Chicago classification; High resolution manometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DYSPHAGIA; ESOPHAGUS ACHALASIA; ESOPHAGUS FUNCTION DISORDER; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIQUID; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANOMETER; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID; STANDING; SUPINE POSITION; SWALLOWING; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 84866272515     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01989.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJPM. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: 57-65.
2. Sears VW, Jr., Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 857-64.
3. Tutuian R, Katz PO, Gideon RM, Castell DO. Normal values for esophageal manometry in the sitting position. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96 (Suppl.): S41.
4. Babaei A, Mittal RK. Cardiovascular compression of the esophagus and spread of gastro-esophageal reflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 45-51.
5. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 509-e198.
6. Allen ML, Orr WC, Mellow MH, Robinson MG. Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 831-3.
7. Blonski W, Hila A, Jain V, Freeman J, Vela M, Castell DO. Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compared to liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 917-22.
8. Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell DO, Tutuian R. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1198-205.
9. Roman S, Damon H, Pellissier PE, Mion F. Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: 271-5.