Interrater and intrarater agreement of the chicago classification of achalasia subtypes using high-resolution esophageal manometry

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 207-214

  Hernandez, Jose C ^a   Ratuapli, Shiva K ^a   Burdick, George E ^a   Dibaise, John K ^a   Crowell, Michael D ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ESOPHAGUS ACHALASIA; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; HIGH RESOLUTION ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ESOPHAGEAL ACHALASIA; HUMANS; MANOMETRY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84856697322     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.353     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Reynolds JC, Parkman HP. Achalasia. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 1989; 18: 223-55. (Pubitemid 19205892)
2. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1526-33.
3. Hirano I, Tatum RP, Shi G et al. Manometric heterogeneity in patients with idiopathic achalasia. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 789-98. (Pubitemid 32193174)
4. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 209-24. (Pubitemid 40039972)
5. Camacho-Lobato L, Katz PO, Eveland J et al. Vigorous achalasia: original description requires minor change. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 33 : 375-7. (Pubitemid 33026721)
6. Todorczuk JR, Aliperti G, Staiano A et al. Reevaluation of the manometric criteria for vigorous achalasia. Is this a distinct clinical disorder? Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36: 274-8.
7. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 27-37.
8. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography. The Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 627-35. (Pubitemid 351572265)
9. Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ et al. High-Resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophgeal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motility 2009; 21: 796-806.
10. Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high resolution pressure topography: what has changed?. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105 : 981-7.
11. Pratab N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S et al. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motility 2011; 17: 48-53.
12. Clouse RE, Parks TR, Staiano A et al. Creation of an electronic sleeve emulation (eSleeve) for use with solid-state high-resolution manometry (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2004; 126: A111.
13. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293 : G878-85. (Pubitemid 47605932)
14. Hayes AF, KrippendorffK. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Measures 2007; 1: 77-89.
15. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall & Sons: London, 1991.
16. Cantor AB. Sample-size calculation for Cohen's kappa. Psychol Method 1996; 1: 150-3.