Reproducibility of esophageal high-resolution manometry

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2011, Pages

  Bogte, A ^a   Bredenoord, A J ^a,b   Oors, J ^b   Siersema, P D ^a   Smout, A J P M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Esophagus; High resolution manometry; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIGESTIVE TRACT PARAMETERS; ESOPHAGEAL HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE RELAXATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STOMACH PRESSURE;

ADULT; ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER, LOWER; ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER, UPPER; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79959324414     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01713.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak P et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 533-42.
2. Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut 2001; 49: 145-51.
3. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: G677-84.
4. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of normal and high-amplitude esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol 1993; 265: G1098-107.
5. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290: G988-97.
6. Karamanolis G, Stevens W, Vos R, Tack J, Clave P, Sifrim D. Oesophageal tone and sensation in the transition zone between proximal striated and distal smooth muscle oesophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008; 20: 291-7.
7. Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ, Lodhia N, Pandolfino JE. Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G1023-8.
8. Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21: 796-806.
9. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 627-35.
10. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: Impedance and high-resolution manometry. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 131-8.
11. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek M, Kahrilas PJ. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical oesophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G878-85.
12. Shi G, Ergun GA, Manka M, Kahrilas PJ. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation characteristics using a sleeve sensor in clinical manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 2373-9.