Normal esophageal high-resolution manometry and impedance values in the supine and sitting positions in the population of Northern China

Diseases of the Esophagus

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 267-272

  Gao, F ^a   Gao, Y ^a   Hobson, A R ^b   Huang, W N ^a   Shang, Z M ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Functional Gut Clinic   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body position; Bolus consistency; High resolution manometry and impedance; Normal value

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CHINA; COMPLETE BOLUS TRANSIT RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTAL CONTRACTILE INTEGRAL; DISTAL ESOPHAGEAL AMPLITUDE; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT FUNCTION; GEL; HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY AND IMPEDANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPEDANCE; INTEGRATED RELAXATION PRESSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SITTING; SUPINE POSITION; SWALLOWING; TOTAL BOLUS TRANSIT TIME; VISCOSITY; VOLUNTEER; ESOPHAGUS; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CHINA; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTURE; SUPINE POSITION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84920195240     PISSN: 11208694     EISSN: 14422050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dote.12320     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bredenoord A J, Kahrilas P J, Pandolfino J E, Schwizer W, Smout A J P M. The international high resolution manometry working group: Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24 (Suppl. 1): 57-65.
2. Pandolfino J E, Kahrilas P J. New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 131-138.
3. Kessing B F, Smout A J, Bredenoord A J. Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2012; 14: 197-205.
4. Kahrilas P J, Ghosh S K, Pandolfino J E. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 627-635.
5. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 509-e198.
6. Bogte A, Bredenoord A J, Oors J, Siersema P D, Smount A J. Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25: 762-e579.
7. Weijenborg P W, Kessing B F, Smount A J P M, Bredenoord A J. Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population: a review of all current metrics. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 654-659.
8. Nguyen N Q, Rigda R, Tippett M, Conchillo J, Smout A J, Holloway R H. Assessment of oesophageal motor function using combined perfusion manometry and multi- channel intra-luminal impedance measurement in normal subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2005; 17: 458-465.
9. Daniel P, Jody C, Jason R etal. Functional aspects of distal oesophageal spasm: the role of onset velocity and contraction amplitude on bolus transit. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 569-575.
10. Roman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek M A, Pandolfino J E, Kahrilas P J. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia. Am J Gastroentero 2011; 106: 349-356.
11. Shi Y, Xiao Y, Peng S, Lin J, Xiong L, Chen M. Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 1611-1615.
12. Tutuian R, Vela M F, Balaji N S etal. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multi center study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 1: 174-182.
13. William J B, Peter J K, Monika A K, Sudip K G, Albert M, John E P. Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2721-2728.
14. Ghosh S K, Pandolfino J E, Rice J, Clarke J O, Kwiatek M, Kahrilas P J. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G878-885.
15. Blonski W, Vaela M, Hila A, Castell D O. Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 155-160.
16. Roman S, Damon H, Pellissier P, Mion F. Does body position modify the results of high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: 271-275.
17. Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell D O, Tutuian R. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1198-1205.
18. Xiao Y L, Read A, Nicodeme F, Roman S, Kahrilsa P J, Pandolfino J E. The effects of a sitting versus supine on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: e509-516.