Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2540-2547

  Zaborowska, Magdalena ^a   Bodin, Aase ^a   Bäckdahl, Henrik ^a   Popp, Jenni ^c   Goldstein, Aaron ^c   Gatenholm, Paul ^a,b,c  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Bone tissue engineering; MC3T3 E1; Mineralization; Porogen

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CELLS; CELLULOSE; COLLAGEN; CYTOLOGY; ELASTIC MODULI; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MICROPOROSITY; MICROSPHERES; MINERALOGY; PARAFFINS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE REGENERATION;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BIOMATERIAL SCAFFOLDS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CELLULOSE SCAFFOLDS; MC3T3-E1; MICROPOROUS; MINERALISATION; NANO-POROUS; POROGENS;

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

BACTERIAL POLYSACCHARIDE; BIOMATERIAL; CELLULOSE; PARAFFIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOSYNTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; CELL GROWTH; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEASUREMENT; MINERALIZATION; MOUSE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEM CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMISTRY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BONE REGENERATION; CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED;

EID: 77955914594     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Palsson BO, Bhatia SN. Tissue engineering. London: Pearson Education; 2004.
2. Deng H-W, Liu Y-Z. Current topics in bone biology. Hackensack: World Scientific; 2005.
3. Katti KS. Biomaterials in total joint replacement. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004;39:133-42.
4. Dee KC, Puleo DA, Bizios R. An introduction to tissue-biomaterial interactions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
5. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 2004;743:765.
6. Freshney RI. Biology of cultured cells. Culture of animal cells - a manual of basic techniques. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2000.
7. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000;21:2529-43.
8. Burg KJL, Porter S, Kellam JF. Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2000;21:2347-59.
9. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005;26:5474-91.
10. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials science - an introduction to materials in medicine. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
11. Helenius G, Bäckdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:431-8.
12. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan D, Brittberg M, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005;26:419-31.
13. Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Gustafsson L, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Manufacturing and characterization of bacterial cellulose tubes using two different fermentation techniques. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Modern multidisciplinary applied microbiology: exploiting microbes and their interactions. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2006.
14. Rambo CR, Recouvreux DOS, Carminatti CA, Pitlovanciv AK, Antonio RV, Porto LM. Template assisted synthesis of porous nanofibrous cellulose membranes for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 2008;28:549-54.
15. Bäckdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B, et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2006;27:2141-9.
16. Bäckdahl H, Esguerra M, Delbro D, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regenerative Med 2008;1:22.
17. Ma PX, Choi J-W. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds with well-defined interconnected spherical pore network. Tissue Eng 2001;7:23-33.
18. Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Fink H, Gustafsson L, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Influence of cultivation conditions on mechanical and morphological properties of bacterial cellulose tubes. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;97:425-34.
19. Matsuoka M, Tsuchida T, Matsushita K, Adachi O, Yoshinaga F. A synthetic medium for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum subsp. sucrofermentation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1996;60:575-9.
20. Motherway JA, Verschueren P, Perre GVd, Sloten JV, Gilchrist MD. The mechanical properties of cranial bone: the effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position. J Biomech 2009;42:2129-35.
21. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89.
22. Goldstein AS. Effect of seeding osteoprogenitor cells as dense clusters on cell growth and differentiation. Tissue Eng 2001;7:817-27.
23. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro-and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-88.
24. Smith LA, Liu X, Hu J, Ma PX. The influence of three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds on the osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 2009;30:2516-22.
25. Chen VJ, Smith LA, Ma PX. Bone regeneration on computer-designed nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006;27:3973-9.
26. Hayashi T. Biodegradable polymers for biomedical uses. Prog Polym Sci 1994;19:663-702.
27. Märtson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T, Laippala P, Saukko P. Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials 1999;20:1989-95.
28. Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Fink H, Brumer H, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Modification of nanocellulose with a xylogucan-RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: implications for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2007;8:3697-704.
29. Kohane D, Langer R. Polymeric biomaterials in tissue engineering. Pediatr Res 2008;63:487-91.
30. Langer R. Biomaterials: status, challenges, and perspectives. Am Inst Chem Eng 2000;46:1286-9.
31. Wan YZ, Huang Y, Yuan CD, Raman S, Zhu Y, Jiang HJ, et al. Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2007;27:855-64.
32. Hutchens SA, Benson RS, Evans BR, O'Neill HM, Rawn CJ. Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel. Biomaterials 2006;27:4661-5670.
33. Hong L, Wang YL, Jia SR, Huang Y, Gao C, Wan YZ. Hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose composites synthesized via a biomimetic route. Mater Lett 2006;60:1710-3.
34. Fang B, Wan YZ, Tang TT, Gao Y, Dai KR. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng A 2009;15:1091-8.
35. Liu X, Smith LA, Hu J, Ma PX. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009;30:2252-8.