Studies on the biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose

Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 97-112

  Andrade, Fábia K ^a   Alexandre, Nuno ^b   Amorim, Irina ^c   Gartner, Fátima ^c   Maurício, Ana Colette ^c   Luís, Ana Lúcia ^c   Gama, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

adhesion peptide Arg Gly Asp; arteries and veins; Bacterial cellulose; bacterial cellulose biocompatibility; cell adhesion; mechanical properties; tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ARG GLY ASPS; ARTERIES AND VEINS; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE MEMBRANES; BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; CELL DISTRIBUTION; CELLULOSE-BINDING; CHIMERIC PROTEINS; EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; FUNCTIONALIZED; HUMAN ARTERY; MECHANICAL TESTS; NEGATIVE CONTROL;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PEPTIDES; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CELLULOSE;

ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE; POLITEF; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; SILICON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERY; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; BACTERIAL MEMBRANE; BINDING KINETICS; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; LYMPHOCYTIC INFILTRATION; MACROPHAGE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; RISK REDUCTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEEP; VEIN;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84872457162     PISSN: 08839115     EISSN: 15308030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0883911512467643     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993 ; 260: 920-926
2. Campbell JH, Efendy JL, Campbell GR. Novel vascular graft grown within recipient's own peritoneal cavity. Circ Res. 1999 ; 85: 1173-1178
3. Chue WL, Campbell GR, Caplice N, et al. Dog peritoneal and pleural cavities as bioreactors to grow autologous vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2004 ; 39: 859-867
4. Konig G, McAllister TN, Dusserre N, et al. Mechanical properties of completely autologous human tissue engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous vein and mammary artery. Biomaterials. 2009 ; 30: 1542-1550
5. L'Heureux N, Dusserre N, Konig G, et al. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat Med. 2006 ; 12: 361-365
6. L'Heureux N, Germain L, Labbe R, et al. In vitro construction of a human blood vessel from cultured vascular cells: a morphologic study. J Vasc Surg. 1993 ; 17: 499-509
7. L'Heureux N, Paquet S, Labbe R, et al. A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J. 1998 ; 12: 47-56
8. Andrade FK, Pertile RAN, Douradoa F, et al Cellulose: structure and properties, derivatives and industrial uses. Lejeune A and Deprez T, ed. Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. ; 2010: 427-458.
9. Oliveira RCB, Souza FC, Castro M. Avaliação da resposta tecidual quando da substituição da cartilagem do septo nasal de coelhos por manta de celulose bacteriana. Estudo experimental. ACTA ORL/Técnicas em Otorrinolaringologia. 2007 ; 25: 267-277
10. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials. 2005 ; 26: 419-431
11. Fontana JD, De Souza AM, Fontana CK, et al. Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1990 ; 24-25: 253-264
12. Pippi NL, Sampaio AJSA. Estudos preliminares sobre o comportamento do Biofill na ceratoplastia lamelar em coelhos. Cienc Rural. 1990 ; 20: 297-302
13. Lin Y, Chen K, Ou K, et al. Effects of different extracellular matrices and growth factor immobilization on biodegradability and biocompatibility of macroporous bacterial cellulose. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2011 ; 6: 508-518
14. dos Anjos B, Novaes AB, Meffert R, et al. Clinical comparison of cellulose and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of class II furcations in mandibular molars with 6-month re-entry. J Periodontol. 1998 ; 69: 454-459
15. Novaes AB, Novaes AB. Bone formation over a TiAl6V4 (IMZ) implant placed into an extraction socket in association with membrane therapy (Gengiflex). Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993 ; 4: 106-110
16. Novaes AB, Novaes AB. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 ; 10: 609-613
17. Novaes AB, Novaes AB. Soft tissue management for primary closure in guided bone regeneration: surgical technique and case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 ; 12: 84-87
18. Novaes AB, Novaes AB, Grissi MFM, et al. Gengiflex, an alkali-cellulose membrane for GTR: histologic observations. Braz Dent J. 1993 ; 4: 65-71
19. Salata LA, Craig GT, Brook IM. In-vivo evaluation of a new membrane (Gengiflex) for guided bone regeneration. Divisional abstracts: The British society of Dental Research. J Dent Res 1995. 74: 825
20. Sonohara MK, Greghi SLA. Avaliação da resposta biológica a diferentes barreiras mecânicas, utilizadas na técnica de regeneração tecidual guiada (RTG). J Appl Oral Sci. 1994 ; 2: 96-102
21. Brancher JA, Torres MF. Reparação microcirúrgica de nervo facial de ratos Wistar por meio de sutura - Parte II. Rev Sul-Bras Odontol. 2005 ; 2: 34-38
22. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, et al. Bacterial synthesized cellulose - artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci. 2001 ; 26: 1561-1603
23. Chen YM, Xi T, Zheng Y, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of bacterial cellulose scaffolds used for tissue-engineered bone. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2009 ; 24: 137-145
24. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, et al. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2010 ; 6: 2540-2547
25. Andrade FK, Costa R, Domingues L, et al. Improving bacterial cellulose for blood vessel replacement: functionalization with a chimeric protein containing a cellulose-binding module and an adhesion peptide. Acta Biomater. 2010 ; 6: 4034-4041
26. Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials. 2006 ; 27: 2141-2149
27. Esguerra M, Fink H, Laschke MW, et al. Intravital fluorescent microscopic evaluation of bacterial cellulose as scaffold for vascular grafts. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 ; 93: 140-149
28. Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 ; 76: 431-438
29. Mendes PN, Rahal SC, Pereira-Junior OC, et al. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of an Acetobacter xylinum synthesized microbial cellulose membrane intended for guided tissue repair. Acta Vet Scand. 2009 ; 51: 12
30. Pertile RA, Moreira S, Costa RM, et al. Bacterial cellulose: long-term biocompatibility studies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2012 ; 23: 1339-1354
31. Wippermann J, Schumann D, Klemm D, et al. Preliminary results of small arterial substitute performed with a new cylindrical biomaterial composed of bacterial cellulose. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 ; 37: 592-596
32. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, et al. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules. 2007 ; 8: 1-12
33. Andrade FK, Moreira SM, Domingues L, et al. Improving the affinity of fibroblasts for bacterial cellulose using carbohydrate-binding modules fused to RGD. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 ; 92: 9-17
34. Putra A, Kakugo A, Furukawa H, et al. Tubular bacterial cellulose gel with oriented fibrils on the curved surface. Polymer. 2008 ; 49: 1885-1891
35. Backdahl H, Esguerra M, Delbro D, et al. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2008 ; 2: 320-330
36. Bodin A, Backdahl H, Fink H, et al. Influence of cultivation conditions on mechanical and morphological properties of bacterial cellulose tubes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 ; 97: 425-434
37. Sanchavanakit N, Sangrungraungroj W, Kaomongkolgit R, et al. Growth of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts on bacterial cellulose film. Biotechnol Prog. 2006 ; 22: 1194-1199
38. McKenna BA, Mikkelsen D, Wehr JB, et al. Mechanical and structural properties of native and alkali-treated bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. Cellulose. 2009 ; 16: 1047-1055
39. Pukacki F, Jankowski T, Gabriel M, et al. The mechanical properties of fresh and cryopreserved arterial homografts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 ; 20: 21-24
40. Purinya BA, Knets IV, Kas'yanov VA. Autogenous vein transplants in reconstructive vascular surgery. Mech Compos Mater 1975. 11: 133-138
41. Martins CL Biomaterial science: an introduction to materials in medicine. 2 nd ed. London: Academic press, 2004, pp. 819-820. Ratner BD Hoffman AS Schoen FJ, ed. London: Academic press ; 2004: 819-820.
42. Heilshorn SC, Liu JC, Tirrell DA. Cell-binding domain context affects cell behavior on engineered proteins. Biomacromolecules. 2005 ; 6: 318-323
43. Kurihara H, Nagamune T. Cell adhesion ability of artificial extracellular matrix proteins containing a long repetitive Arg-Gly-Asp sequence. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005 ; 100: 82-87
44. Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Volberg T, Micoulet A, et al. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys J. 2007 ; 92: 2964-2974
45. Singer I, Kazazis DM, Scott S. Scanning electron microscopy of focal contacts on the substratum attachment surface of fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin. J Cell Sci. 1989 ; 93 (Pt 1). 147-154
46. Hood JD, Cheresh DA. Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 ; 2: 91-100
47. Gallin JI, Synderman R Inflammation: basic principles and clinical correlates. 3 rd ed.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, p. 1335. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ; 1999: 1335.
48. Johnston RB. Current concepts: immunology. Monocytes and macrophages. N Engl J Med. 1988 ; 318: 747-752
49. Rae T. The macrophage response to implant materials - with special reference to those used in orthopedics. Crit Rev Biocompat. 1986 ; 2: 97-126
50. Greisler H. Macrophage-biomaterial interactions with bioresorbable vascular prostheses. ASAIO Trans. 1988 ; 34: 1051-1059
51. Babensee JE, Anderson JM, McIntire LV, et al. Host response to tissue engineered devices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998 ; 33: 111-139
52. Anderson JM, Gristina AG, Hanson SR, et al Biomaterial science: an introduction to materials in medicine. Ratner BD Hoffman AS Schoen FJ, ed. London: Academic press ; 1996: 171.
53. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008 ; 20: 86-100
54. Martson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T, et al. Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials. 1999 ; 20: 1989-1995