Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes: A systematic review

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 373-383

  De Carlo, Francesco ^a   Celestino, Francesco ^b   Verri, Cristian ^a   Masedu, Francesco ^c   Liberati, Emanuele ^b   Di Stasi, Savino Mauro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b Policlinico Casilino   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Prostate cancer; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Radical prostatectomy; Radical retropubic prostatectomy; Sexual function; Surgery; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PENIS ERECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTOR;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84921266976     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: 14230399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000366008     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid H, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F: EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 61-71.
2. Schuessler W, Sculam P, Clayman R, Kavoussi L: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854-857.
3. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643-1649.
4. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM: Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy-critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 612-624.
5. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody J, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168: 945-949.
6. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W: Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45-56.
7. Artibani W, Cavalleri S, Iafrate M, et al: Learning curve of an experienced open surgeon with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2008; 80: 237-244.
8. Bolenz C, Freedland S, Hollenbeck B, Lotan Y, Lowrance W, Nelson J, Hu JC: Costs of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 316-324.
9. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822-830.
10. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, et al: Intraand perioperative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 98-104.
11. Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, et al: Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 606-614.
12. Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, et al: A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 170: 1798-1803.
13. Prasad SM, Keating NL, Wang Q, et al: Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 647-652.
14. Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, et al: Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 83-89.
15. Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P: Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1461-1466.
16. Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP, et al: Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008; 179: 1811-1817.
17. Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, Shirley M, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R: Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: A health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 361-369.
18. Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC: Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 2003; 62: 292-297.
19. Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su LM: Prospective comparison of shortterm convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 612-616.
20. Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, et al: Radical prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 2003; 20: 360-366.
21. Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G, et al: Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of perioperative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 401-406.
22. Egawa S, Kuruma H, Suyama K, Iwamura M, Baba S: Delayed recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 207-212.
23. Atallah F, Khedis M, Seguin P, Fourcade O, Samii K: Postoperative analgesia and recovery after open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1878-1879.
24. Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Diamond SM, Strup SE: Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2004; 22: 102-106.
25. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Dillenburg W, Becht E: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 1341-1349.
26. Silva E, Ferreira U, Silva GD, et al: Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: A comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39: 865-869.
27. Terakawa T, Miyake H, Tanaka K, Takenaka A, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M: Surgical margin status of open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy specimens. Int J Urol 2008; 15: 704-707.
28. Fromont G, Guillonneau B, Validire P, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary pathologic evaluation. Urology 2002; 60: 661-665.
29. Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A, et al: Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 104-111.
30. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T: Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689-1693.
31. Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Levrel O, et al: Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 2003; 61: 386-390.
32. Martorana G, Manferrari F, Bertaccini A, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation in the early phase of the learning curve comparing to retropubic approach. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2004; 76: 1-5.
33. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60: 864-868.
34. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M: A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205-210.
35. Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 360-363.
36. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al: Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 177: 929-931
37. Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, et al: Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1145-1149.
38. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2389.
39. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al: Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: A matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103: 448-453.
40. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW: Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819-822.
41. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, et al: Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 175: 541-546.
42. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, et al: A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single institution experience. J Urol 2007; 178: 478-482.
43. Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR: Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Are there any differences? BJU Int 2005; 96: 39-42.
44. Williams SB, Chen MH, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, Kacker R, Hirsch MS, Richie JP, Hu JC: Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010; 76: 1097-1101.
45. Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A: A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 1-6.
46. Laurilla TAJ, Huang W, Jarrard DF: Roboticassisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Urol Oncol 2009; 27: 529-533.
47. Weizer AZ, Strope S, Wood DP: Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: What are the REAL outcomes? Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 210-214.
48. Froehner M, Novotny V, Koch R, Leike S, Twelker L, Wirth MP: Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int 2013; 90: 312-315.
49. Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misraï V, Haertig A, Bitker M-C, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Rouprêt M: Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2009; 27: 599-605.
50. Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Joniau S, Van Kampen M: Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2013; 112: 936-943.
51. Harty NJ, Kozinn SI, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A: Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2013; 39: 639-646.
52. Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, De Cobelli O: Robotic vs. open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: A matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2009; 104: 991-995.
53. Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO, Clark PE, Chang SS, Davis R, Duke Herrell S, Baumgartner R, Mishra V, Chan RC, Smith JA, Cookson MS: Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1036-1040.
54. Son SJ, Lee SC, Jeong CW, Jeong SJ, Byun SS, Lee SE: Comparison of continence recovery between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: A single surgeon experience. Korean J Urol 2013; 54: 598-602.
55. Ryu J, Kwon T, Kyung YS, Hong S, You D, Jeong IG, Kim C-S: Retropubic versus robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A comparative study of postoperative complications. Korean J Urol 2013; 54: 756-761.
56. Vora AA, Marchalik D, Kowalczyk KJ, Nissim H, Bandi G, McGeagh KG, Lynch GH, Ghasemian SR, Verghese M, Venkatesan K, Borges P, Uchio EM, Hwang JJ: Robotic-assisted prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy for locally-advanced prostate cancer: multi-institution comparison of oncologic outcomes. Prostate Int 2013; 1: 31-36