Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 112, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 936-943

  Geraerts, Inge ^a   Van Poppel, Hendrik ^a   Devoogdt, Nele ^a   Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben ^a   Joniau, Steven ^a   Van Kampen, Marijke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

open and robot assisted radical prostatectomy; quality of life; urinary incontinence; voiding symptoms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL PROSTATE SYMPTOM SCORE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KING HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; LOW RISK POPULATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE TRAINING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SUDDEN DEATH; SURVIVAL; TRAFFIC NOISE; TREATMENT DURATION; URINARY DYSFUNCTION; URINE INCONTINENCE; URINE LEAK;

OPEN AND ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; URINARY INCONTINENCE; VOIDING SYMPTOMS;

HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINATION DISORDERS;

EID: 84886090676     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12258     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ribeiro LH, Prota C, Gomes CM, et al. Long-term effect of early postoperative pelvic floor biofeedback on continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2010; 184: 1034-1039
2. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 405-417
3. Van Kampen M, de Weerdt W, Van Poppel H, De Ridder D, Feys H, Baert L,. Effect of pelvic-floor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2000; 355: 98-102
4. Manassero F, Traversi C, Ales V, et al. Contribution of early intensive prolonged pelvic floor exercises on urinary continence recovery after bladder neck-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective controlled randomized trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 985-989
5. Burgio KL, Goode PS, Urban DA, et al. Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioral training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2006; 175: 196-201
6. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 431-452
7. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, members of the VIPT. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205-210
8. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104: 534-539
9. Rocco B, Matei D-V, Melegari S, et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2009; 104: 991-995
10. Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A,. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 1-6
11. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103: 448-453
12. Smith JJA, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2390
13. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 648-658
14. Namiki S, Saito S, Ishidoya S, et al. Adverse effect of radical prostatectomy on nocturia and voiding frequency symptoms. Urology 2005; 66: 147-151
15. Sammon JD, Muhletaler F, Peabody JO, Diaz-Insua M, Satyanaryana R, Menon M,. Long-term functional urinary outcomes comparing single- vs double-layer urethrovesical anastomosis: two-year follow-up of a two-group parallel randomized controlled trial. Urology 2010; 76: 1102-1107
16. Miller J, Smith A, Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS,. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 854-859
17. Malcolm JB, Fabrizio MD, Barone BB, et al. Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2010; 183: 1822-1829
18. Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H, et al. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 2045-2048
19. Hsu C-Y, Joniau S, Van Poppel H,. Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer: technical aspects of radical prostatectomy. EAU Update 2005; 3: 90-97
20. Van Poppel H, Joniau S,. Open radical prostatectomy. In, Bolla M, Van Poppel H, eds, Management of Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Chapt 8. Leuven: Springer, 2012: 93-104
21. Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HRH,. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 2006; 175: 945-951
22. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW,. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819-822
23. Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X,. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol 2004; 171: 1212-1215
24. Lo KL, Ng CF, Lam CN, Hou SS, To KF, Yip SK,. Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med J 2010; 16: 31-35
25. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1234-1241
26. Gacci M, Carini M, Simonato A, et al. Factors predicting continence recovery 1 month after radical prostatectomy: results of a multicenter survey. Int J Urol 2011; 18: 700-708
27. Suardi N, Moschini M, Gallina A, et al. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery. BJU Int 2012; 111: 717-722
28. Yang B, Ye D, Peng J, et al. [Analysis of risk factors for urinary continence after radical prostatectomy]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2011; 91: 2239-2242
29. Ferronha F, Barros F, Santos VV, Ravery V, Delmas V,. Is there any evidence of superiority between retropubic, laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Int Braz J Urol 2011; 37: 146-158