Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: Open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 639-648

  Harty, Niall J ^a   Kozinn, Spencer I ^a   Canes, David ^a   Sorcini, Andrea ^a   Moinzadeh, Alireza ^a   Tobias Machado, Marcos ^b   Carlos, Alexandre Stievano ^b   Pompeo, Antonio Carlos Lima ^b  

^a LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DO ABC   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Prostate cancer, familial Supplementary Concept ; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Urgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLOOD; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; BIOPSY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84891645474     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: 16776119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.05.05     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Okajima E, Yoshikawa M, Masuda Y, Shimizu K, Tanaka N, Hirayama A, et al.: Improvement of the surgical curability of locally confined prostate cancer including non-organ-confined high-risk disease through retropubic radical prostatectomy with intentional wide resection. World J Surg Oncol. 2012; 10: 249.
2. Mitchell CR, Boorjian SA, Umbreit EC, Rangel LJ, Carlson RE, Karnes RJ: 20-Year survival after radical prostatectomy as initial treatment for cT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012; 110: 1709-13.
3. Lepor H: Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Rev Urol. 2005 Summer; 7: 115-27.
4. Raman JD, Dong S, Levinson A, Samadi D, Scherr DS: Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve. JSLS. 2007; 11: 1-7.
5. Wilson T, Torrey R: Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol. 2011; 21: 200-5.
6. Tobias-Machado M, Starling ES, Carlos AS, Pompeo AC, Romanelli P, Nishimoto R: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high risk localized and locally advanced disease. Int Braz J Urol. 2012; 38: 430; discussion 431.
7. Casey JT, Meeks JJ, Greco KA, Wu SD, Nadler RB: Outcomes of locally advanced (T3 or greater) prostate cancer in men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2009; 23: 1519-22.
8. Jayram G, Decastro GJ, Large MC, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL, et al.: Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center. J Endourol. 2011; 25: 455-7.
9. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carroll PR, et al.: Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 368-81.
10. Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F, Carlucci JR, Brajtbord JS, Samadi DB: Nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy in preoperatively high-risk patients is safe and efficacious. Urol Oncol. 2012; 30: 26-32.